Newsletter Subject

The Civil War, Rewritten: What If the Battle of Gettysburg Had Machine Guns?

From

popularmechanics.com

Email Address

popularmechanics@newsletter.popularmechanics.com

Sent On

Sun, Feb 4, 2024 04:03 PM

Email Preheader Text

What if the Union Army had machine guns at the Battle of Gettysburg? What if Robert E. Lee had obser

What if the Union Army had machine guns at the Battle of Gettysburg? What if Robert E. Lee had observation balloons to spy on his opponents? These are the sorts of questions that tempt alternative history buffs. The popularity of speculative novels and movies demonstrates that humans can’t resist the chance to explore what might have been. But some are putting alt history to a more practical purpose: teaching U.S. military officers to deal with the impact of new technologies. New weapons, such as drones and hypersonic missiles, have revolutionized war and sent armies scrambling to devise new tactics. So why not use the past to spur thinking about the future? That’s why the RAND Corporation think tank devised a Gettysburg wargame for the U.S. Army’s Futures program, which deals with questions such as what equipment and doctrine the Army will need in coming years. “The whole idea is to create an historical laboratory,” Gian Gentile, a retired Army colonel and historian who is now director of RAND’s Arroyo Center, told Popular Mechanics. “Using counterfactuals that will allow the players to learn from them, and apply them to their present and future thinking.” The RAND game took an historical event, but made a few counterfactual changes. This Battle of Gettysburg would feature the historical armies, but they would be armed with advanced equipment—not with lasers or guided missiles, but technology that was actually available in 1863, yet which the Union and Confederacy failed to take advantage of. [View in Browser]( [Popular Mechanics]( [SHOP]( [EXCLUSIVE]( [SUBSCRIBE]( [The Civil War, Rewritten: What If the Battle of Gettysburg Had Machine Guns?]( [The Civil War, Rewritten: What If the Battle of Gettysburg Had Machine Guns?]( [The Civil War, Rewritten: What If the Battle of Gettysburg Had Machine Guns?]( What if the Union Army had machine guns at the Battle of Gettysburg? What if Robert E. Lee had observation balloons to spy on his opponents? These are the sorts of questions that tempt alternative history buffs. The popularity of speculative novels and movies demonstrates that humans can’t resist the chance to explore what might have been. But some are putting alt history to a more practical purpose: teaching U.S. military officers to deal with the impact of new technologies. New weapons, such as drones and hypersonic missiles, have revolutionized war and sent armies scrambling to devise new tactics. So why not use the past to spur thinking about the future? That’s why the RAND Corporation think tank devised a Gettysburg wargame for the U.S. Army’s Futures program, which deals with questions such as what equipment and doctrine the Army will need in coming years. “The whole idea is to create an historical laboratory,” Gian Gentile, a retired Army colonel and historian who is now director of RAND’s Arroyo Center, told Popular Mechanics. “Using counterfactuals that will allow the players to learn from them, and apply them to their present and future thinking.” The RAND game took an historical event, but made a few counterfactual changes. This Battle of Gettysburg would feature the historical armies, but they would be armed with advanced equipment—not with lasers or guided missiles, but technology that was actually available in 1863, yet which the Union and Confederacy failed to take advantage of. What if the Union Army had machine guns at the Battle of Gettysburg? What if Robert E. Lee had observation balloons to spy on his opponents? These are the sorts of questions that tempt alternative history buffs. The popularity of speculative novels and movies demonstrates that humans can’t resist the chance to explore what might have been. But some are putting alt history to a more practical purpose: teaching U.S. military officers to deal with the impact of new technologies. New weapons, such as drones and hypersonic missiles, have revolutionized war and sent armies scrambling to devise new tactics. So why not use the past to spur thinking about the future? That’s why the RAND Corporation think tank devised a Gettysburg wargame for the U.S. Army’s Futures program, which deals with questions such as what equipment and doctrine the Army will need in coming years. “The whole idea is to create an historical laboratory,” Gian Gentile, a retired Army colonel and historian who is now director of RAND’s Arroyo Center, told Popular Mechanics. “Using counterfactuals that will allow the players to learn from them, and apply them to their present and future thinking.” The RAND game took an historical event, but made a few counterfactual changes. This Battle of Gettysburg would feature the historical armies, but they would be armed with advanced equipment—not with lasers or guided missiles, but technology that was actually available in 1863, yet which the Union and Confederacy failed to take advantage of. [Read More]( [Read More]( [An Ancient Tomb Held Anonymous Bodies for 2,300 Years. Turns Out They're Famous Royals.]( [An Ancient Tomb Held Anonymous Bodies for 2,300 Years. Turns Out They're Famous Royals.]( In a startling development, archaeologists say these mysterious skeletons are the father and son of this legendary ruler. [Read More]( [Alternate text] [Alternate text] [Conspiracy Theorists Think Taylor Swift Is a Government Spy. These Celebs Actually Were.]( [Conspiracy Theorists Think Taylor Swift Is a Government Spy. These Celebs Actually Were.]( While some conservatives believe the pop star is a secret psyop, these icons really did carry out covert missions in the name of national security. [Read More]( [The Fearsome Tanks That Fought Saddam Hussein May Soon Come for Vladimir Putin]( The Fearsome Tanks That Fought Saddam Hussein May Soon Come for Vladimir Putin]( From the sands of Kuwait to the fields of Ukraine, the forgotten M-84s are rolling toward a new frontline. [Read More]( [Alternate text] [Alternate text] [A Study Tells the Truth About How the First Continents Formed. It's Not What You Thought.]( [A Study Tells the Truth About How the First Continents Formed. It's Not What You Thought.]( Turns out there was a lot of burying and melting going on at the beginning of the world. [Read More]( [These Fleece Mid-Layers Are Stylish and Warm]( [These Fleece Mid-Layers Are Stylish and Warm]( Our go-to favorites from Patagonia, Merrell, The North Face and more. [Read More]( [Alternate text] [POP Membership]( [LiveIntent Logo]( [AdChoices Logo]( [Need Assistance? Contact Us.](mailto:pmpmembership@popularmechanics.com) Follow Us [Unsubscribe]( | [Privacy Notice]( | [CA Notice at Collection]( Popular Mechanics is a publication of Hearst Magazines. ©2024 Hearst Magazine Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved. This email was sent by Hearst Magazines, 300 West 57th Street, New York, NY 10019-3779

Marketing emails from popularmechanics.com

View More
Sent On

08/12/2024

Sent On

07/12/2024

Sent On

06/12/2024

Sent On

04/12/2024

Sent On

03/12/2024

Sent On

02/12/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.