Newsletter Subject

The Truth About the World’s Most Fascinating Military Machines

From

popularmechanics.com

Email Address

popularmechanics@newsletter.popularmechanics.com

Sent On

Sun, May 14, 2023 04:04 PM

Email Preheader Text

Here’s why they continue to intrigue us. ? The Truth About the World’s Most Fascinating

Here’s why they continue to intrigue us. [View in Browser]( [Popular Mechanics]( [SHOP]( [EXCLUSIVE]( [SUBSCRIBE](   The Truth About the World’s Most Fascinating Military Machines   “Hardware enthusiasts look to the military to see the cutting-edge of technology.” – Letter to The Editor, 1984 “With magazines like yours, Russians don’t need spies—they can read it all in PM.” – Popular Mechanics article entitled Irresistible Force, February, 1992 Military machines have always fascinated us. Maybe it’s because they represent the apex of technological advancement. Or because of their speed, power, and potential for destruction. Maybe it’s because they’re intricate, complex, and eye-wateringly expensive. Or maybe it’s because there’s inevitably more to know. Whatever the reason, at Pop Mech, we’ve been intrigued since our very first issues. Take the airplane. In 1909, we reported that flying machines might have military purposes when Wilbur Wright suggested the future of airplanes lay not in commercial flights, but in the military. “[Airplanes’] greatest held of usefulness,” we quoted Wright as saying, “will be in replacing, largely or entirely, the present horse troops. This winged cavalry of the air will be able to do most things possible to present mounted forces, and many they cannot perform.” Wright may have underestimated the potential for commercial air travel, but his expectations for military aviation were spot on. Though he probably never imagined the incredible plethora of fighters, bombers, and even unmanned combat aerial vehicles to come. Since those early days, we’ve watched (and reported) carefully over the decades while planes—along with naval vessels, weapons, and other military machines—have gotten bigger, better, and more badass than ever. The technology may change, but our curiosity does not. We’re still asking: ❯ How fast could a plane possibly fly? ❯ If the world’s most dangerous planes were used in battle, just how destructive could they be? ❯ How does our technology stack up, and what could give us the edge? ❯ What ultimate machines could be possible (with the right money)? ❯ What is the military still keeping secret? Here’s what we know today:   ❯❯❯ How fast could a plane possibly fly? Lockheed Martin In 1922, the Air Service went all-in on speed. “Realizing that the fast pursuit plane controls the air in time of war,” we wrote at the time, “the U.S. Army Air Service called for construction of planes that would be speedier than others in the world.” The result? [Alternate text] [Alternate text] “Four distinctly different models were delivered, all of which have a speed of over 200 miles per hour,” we reported. “One is of all-metal construction; one has its radiators built into the wings; one has a folding chassis, thus reducing wind resistance, and one has its wings under the fuselage, and open landing gear with no axels.” Today, speed might be more important than ever. While stealth usurped speed as a leading priority in recent decades, that’s changing. With hypersonic missiles entering service in Russia and China, speed is seeing a resurgence. Excitingly, an absurdly fast Mach 10 bomber could be on its way. (For the record, that’s about 38 times faster than those initial 1922 models.) The near-mythical, hypersonic Lockheed Martin SR-72 would be a replacement for the fastest air-breathing piloted aircraft ever built, the SR-71. Just how fast (and how destructive) could this bomber be? Learn all the details: [Everything We Know About the Air Force's Secret Plan to Develop a Hypersonic Bomber](   ❯❯❯ If the world’s most dangerous planes were used in battle, just how destructive could they be? NurPhoto | Getty Images When it comes to the world’s scariest military machines, we hope we won’t have to use them. But we can’t help but to wonder: what would happen if we did? (In a grim example, in a 1945 issue we considered the atomic bomb’s potential for war, noting that it presented an equivalent bomb load of 2000 Superfort bombers.) Today, we speculate: what would happen if the F-35 fighter jet were used against the Russian forces? Pilot Billie Flynn, one of the most accomplished test pilots around, has done it all in an F-35. He contends that while nobody wants NATO dragged into the war, if it was, F-35s could “completely destroy the Russian forces.” Flynn’s thinking is this: the F-35 is completely different, and much more technologically sophisticated, than the Soviet-era fighters Russian pilots are used to. Further, Flynn believes the F-35 would dominate in the air war over Ukraine, because it is exactly the environment the jet was built to excel in. Learn exactly why this plane could bring down Russia: [F-35 Pilot: NATO Could ‘Completely Destroy The Russian Forces’.](   ❯❯❯ How does our technology stack up (and what could give us the edge?) Anadolu Agency | Getty Images As long as Pop Mech has been reporting on military technology, we’ve been sneaking peeks at the “other guys” to see how we stack up. (Case in point: In 1910 we made note of a high speed Japanese military aeroplane that attained a speed of 68 miles per hour—the fastest time on record for aerial navigation back then.) These days, our eyes are on the hypersonic arms race. And compared to Russia and China, the Air Force is undeniably lagging. But that doesn’t mean they’re giving up. Last year, we reported that the United States has more than 70 hypersonic weapons programs in development, with $3.8 billion earmarked for the effort in 2022 alone. Can the Air Force catch up? Get the whole story: [How Russia Beat America to the Hypersonic Missile.]( [Alternate text] [Alternate text] Meanwhile, the Navy has found itself outmatched against China’s latest weapons. In an attempt to keep up (and keep its ships afloat), the Navy has invested heavily in laser technology. The term “investment” is an understatement. America’s newest carrier—The USS Gerald R. Ford—underwent two decades of development and delays, and cost billions more than initial estimates. Discover why this U.S. AirCraft Carrier has been a debacle: [America’s Newest Carrier Is a Fiasco. The Navy Just Admitted Why.]() Still, we can understand why the Navy has been so committed to laser tech. The potential benefits are tantalizing: lasers fire at the speed of light, negating the speed of hypersonic weapons; they can reload quickly to fend off swarms of drones; and they don’t require stores of ammunition, giving ships nearly unlimited firing opportunities. A reliable laser with enough power to stymie hypersonic missiles could be a game-changer. Is this technology realistic, or just a pipe dream? Find out: [The U.S. is Losing the Hypersonic Arms Race to China—But Its New High Powered Lasers are Changing The Game.]( Meantime, ever wonder how the rest of the world’s aircraft carriers compare with our own? Here’s [Every Single Aircraft Carrier In the World](.   ❯❯❯ What ultimate machines could be possible (with enough money)? U.S. Air Force Back in 1909, the Army purchased the world's first military airplane for $30,000. Even in today’s dollars (which would be about $1,000,000), that still sounds like a bargain. As the years went on, we noted the growing costs of military machinery with headlines like this one from 1989: “The $530 million B-2 Stealth Bomber joins the B-52 and the B-1 in forming a Strategic Air Command capable of defeating diverse threats. But the American public must decide if the price is just too high.” But today, the potential—and the financial investment—is on a whole other level. The highly anticipated Next-Generation Air Dominance (NGAD) fighter could be the most expensive fighter jet of all time. With a possible per-unit crewed cost of $200 or $300 million, it would be staggeringly capable… and easily the most expensive fighter ever built. Exactly what could this sixth-generation fighter do (and why might it be worth the cost?) Learn everything we know: [The Air Force’s Secret New Fighter Jet Will Be Wildly Expensive](. However, not all developments are as shudderingly expensive. On the other end of the financial spectrum is the F-36 Kingsnake. The U.S. Air Force has expressed interest in a new, non-stealthy fighter jet to replace the F-16 Viper. In stark contrast to the NGAD fighter, the guiding principles behind the F-36 are speed of development, the ability to incorporate new tech at a later date—and affordability. Get all the details about this multi-role fighter jet: [This Is the F-36 Kingsnake. It Could Be the Air Force's Next Fighter Jet.](   ❯❯❯ What is the military still keeping secret? Northrop Grumman via Breaking Defense With all that we know, there’s so much that we don’t. After all, military technology and secrecy go hand-in-hand. These days, we’re wondering exactly what’s going on with the mysterious objects spotted over Area 51. Satellite imagery revealed an aircraft flying above Area 51. The aircraft, about the size of a fighter jet, broadly lines up with what we know about sixth-generation fighter jets. But why would a secret aircraft fly in full view of imaging satellites? Read the full report: [Umm ... Did the Air Force’s Secret New Fighter Jet Just Fly Over Area 51?]() Of course, there’s many more secrets yet to be revealed. What’s yet to be developed among the world’s greatest military machines? We’ll be watching, and reporting—just as we have for well over a century. Don’t miss a single new development, [become a Pop Mech Pro member](. You’ll immediately unlock all the stories mentioned in this article.   PLUS: When you [become a Pop Mech Pro member](, you’ll also: - Unlock every single story, project plan, guide, video, and gadget review on PopularMechanics.com - Get each print issue delivered straight to your mailbox - Receive a weekly members-only newsletter with exclusive columns from editors and experts - Have a chance to test new products before anyone else - Enjoy the opportunity to appear in Pop Mech - Save on gear from the Pop Mech shop, including free shipping on every order [Alternate text] [POP Membership]( Follow Us [Unsubscribe]( | [Privacy Notice/Notice at Collection]( PopularMechanics.com ©2023 Hearst Magazine Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Hearst Magazines, 300 West 57th Street, New York, NY 10019

Marketing emails from popularmechanics.com

View More
Sent On

31/05/2024

Sent On

30/05/2024

Sent On

29/05/2024

Sent On

28/05/2024

Sent On

27/05/2024

Sent On

26/05/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2024 SimilarMail.