Newsletter Subject

Google's Racist AI Assistant Exposes Tech's Dirty Secret

From

politicsandmyportfolio.com

Email Address

editor@politicsandmyportfolio.com

Sent On

Thu, Mar 7, 2024 04:02 PM

Email Preheader Text

--------------------------------------------------------------- Sponsor Message --------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------- Sponsor Message [Is Gold Really Boring?]( [See why this could be a huge untapped gold investing opportunity.]( --------------------------------------------------------------- The Hidden Threat of AI Bias Google's Racist AI Assistant Exposes Tech's Dirty Secret You may have heard about the controversy over Google's new AI chatbot called Gemini. This artificial intelligence was supposed to be a breakthrough in human-computer interaction, able to understand normal speech rather than coding language. However, something went very wrong. When users asked Gemini to generate images depicting everyday scenes, the AI consistently removed or downplayed the presence of white people from those images. It was almost like Gemini was digitally editing out Caucasian individuals. This shocking display of racial bias forced Google to apologize and suspend Gemini's image generator. But according to experts, the Gemini incident merely exposed the "tip of the iceberg" when it comes to the issue of bias in artificial intelligence systems. How AI Bias Threatens Our Society While AI offers great potential across industries like healthcare, energy, and business analytics, this technology also carries an insidious threat - the prejudiced biases that get baked into AI systems during their training on flawed data. You see, AI doesn't just manifest its skills out of nowhere. It must learn by analyzing vast troves of data encompassing language, images, processes, and more. If that training data contains human biases around race, gender, age, or other factors, the AI will adopt those same flawed prejudices. "These models are prejudiced - and it is up to us to fix them," warns Adnan Masood, a top AI expert at Microsoft. "If we don't tread carefully, these models will cause irreparable damage." The consequences could be devastating: - Companies that fail to detect AI bias open themselves to lawsuits, public backlash, and bad business decisions from discriminatory algorithms. - Widespread use of biased AI risks unlawfully denying loans, healthcare, housing, and jobs to certain demographics, perpetuating systemic discrimination. - AI bias threatens core values like democracy and truth, by potentially being weaponized to silence voices, rewrite history, and skew public discourse. In summary, unchecked AI bias jeopardizes our savings, violates constitutional liberties, and could ultimately destabilize our democracy itself. --------------------------------------------------------------- Sponsor Message [Detecting Cancer in 1.5 Seconds: Early Investment Opportunity]( Stanford engineer's lofty goal of revolutionizing cancer diagnostics is expected to come to fruition with FDA review in its final stages. With a history of taking companies public, including a $2 billion market cap NASDAQ company, this may be his biggest venture yet! With the ability to detect cancer's "molecular fingerprint" in just 1.5 seconds, it also offers far superior accuracy to current detection methods! [Learn more about how this could transform the multi-billion dollar diagnostic market.]( --------------------------------------------------------------- Why Big Tech Avoids Fixing Its Bigoted Software If AI bias poses such grave threats, why don't companies like Google simply fix these flaws? The unfortunate reality is big tech has little incentive to truly de-bias their AI systems. Their approach, as seen with Gemini, is to use "secret prompt engineering" - tweaking the wording of requests to work around AI prejudices, rather than removing underlying biases. So Google didn't retrain Gemini on better data to remove its racial skews. They just added prompts like "generate multi-cultural images" as a Band-Aid solution to avoid PR fallout. As one expert notes, "they've not actually fixed the underlying bias at all." This allows big tech to profit from flawed AI while misleading the public on the extent of the issue. A Balanced Solution: Ethical AI Through Transparency To uphold equality and truth while still allowing AI innovation, we need a balanced approach centered on algorithmic transparency and accountability. Currently, there is an alarming lack of global regulations around AI governance. The EU's GDPR gave users more rights over how data gets used to train algorithms, but overall there are few mechanisms to audit AI bias. In the US, the "Accountability Act" was a first step requiring corporate algorithms to undergo bias testing, but much more is needed to empower external audits of AI systems. "We need global leadership on this," states Masood, to "stop the bigot in the machine from perpetuating its prejudice." The dangers cut across partisan lines. Whether your priority is financial prudence, equal opportunity, freedom of expression, or human autonomy over machines - unchecked AI bias is a looming crisis that demands swift action and sensible governing policies. So be smart, be vigilant, and honestly Google can go to hell. James Reagan Editor, Contributor PoliticsAndMyPortoflio.com --------------------------------------------------------------- Sponsor Message [Rare Chance to Be an Early Investor in AI Energy Breakthrough]( expert Ian King has found a way to invest in the technology powering AI energy. A breakthrough that presents a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity for fast-acting investors. [Just go here for full details.]( --------------------------------------------------------------- PoliticsAndMyPortfolio.com Disclaimer This newsletter contains advertisements which are neither an offer nor recommendation to buy or sell any security. Content marked as "Ad," "Special" or "Sponsor" may be a third party advertisements where the advertiser is paying per click, per lead or per sale and are not endorsed or warranted by our staff or company. Sandpiper Marketing Group, LLC is also being compensated by Summit Publishing Group and Investing Trends up to three dollars per click and may exceed twelve thousand, five hundred dollars per week for placement of specific advertisements contained in this newsletter. Sandpiper Marketing Group, LLC and its principles do not own any of the stocks mentioned in this email or in the article that this email links to. Please see the disclaimer on the advertiser's website for additional information, including their relationship with any mentioned security. Compensation for advertising constitutes a conflict of interest as to our ability to remain objective in our communication regarding any companies profiled. Because of this conflict, individuals are strongly encouraged to not use this newsletter as the basis for any investment decision. This newsletter may contain information regarding investment ideas and third-party ratings regarding specific securities. We hold no investment licenses and are thus neither licensed nor qualified to provide investment advice. Sandpiper Marketing Group, LLC nor its principals are FINRA-registered broker-dealers or investment advisers. The content of this email should not be taken as advice, an endorsement, or a recommendation from Sandpiper Marketing Group, LLC to buy or sell any security. Always consult a real licensed investment professional before making any investment decision. Be extremely careful, investing in securities carries a high degree of risk; you may likely lose some or all of the investment. The content in this newsletter or email is not provided to any individual with a view toward their individual circumstances. Also, because events and circumstances frequently do not occur as expected, there will likely be differences between the any predictions and actual results. While all information is believed to be reliable, it is not guaranteed by us to be accurate. Individuals should assume that all information contained in our newsletter is not trustworthy unless verified by their own independent research. By opening this email or clicking any links contained, you are reconfirming your opt-in status. You can unsubscribe at any time by clicking the link below in the footer. This is part of your free subscription to PoliticsAndMyPortfolio.com 1519 Mecklenburg Hwy Unit 4 | Mt. Mourne | NC | 28123 | United States | 877 411 9808 [Please Click Here To Unsubscribe](

Marketing emails from politicsandmyportfolio.com

View More
Sent On

04/05/2024

Sent On

04/05/2024

Sent On

03/05/2024

Sent On

03/05/2024

Sent On

03/05/2024

Sent On

03/05/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.