Newsletter Subject

New incomplete items attributed to you

From

philpapers.org

Email Address

noreply@philpapers.org

Sent On

Tue, Jun 25, 2019 06:55 AM

Email Preheader Text

Dear {NAME}, New incomplete items attributed to you Some of your works on PhilPapers appear to have

Dear {NAME}, New incomplete items attributed to you [Click here to unsubscribe]( Some of your works on PhilPapers appear to have incomplete records. You might want to complete their records, as this will make it easier for others to find them. A list of records with potential issues is provided below for your convenience. You can also view a dynamically updated version of this list [here]( To help others access your work, please make sure that each of your publications 1) is in the index; 2) has an associated online copy; 3) has full publication details; 4) has an associated abstract in our database; 5) has associated categories at the leaf level in our database. The leaf categories are the narrowest in the category structure. To add a new item to PhilPapers, click 'Submit material' -> 'Submit a book or article' in the top menu. You can also add items from your PhilPeople profile by clicking 'Publications' in the left side menu, and then 'Submit material' at the top. To view all the items attributed to you, visit your PhilPeople profile [here](. You can edit any entry by clicking the gear button in the bottom right and then selecting 'Edit this publication'. In addition to submiting the metadata for your work to PhilPapers, we strongly encourage you to upload a PDF copy if the publisher grants permission. We use archived PDFs in a variety of ways to improve the discoverability of your work on PhilPapers and PhilPeople. If you are submitting a journal article, we provide a tool for checking the publisher's policy on archiving a PDF. Click the "Check publisher's policy" button on the "Archive copy and links" section of the editor. Records missing important information: Paradoxes - a study in form and predication - Cargile,j ([Fix it]( [Not mine]( - This paper has incomplete publication details (publication status unknown). - This paper has no abstract or summary. An author-provided summary is acceptable and recommended even if the paper has no official abstract. - This paper has no associated link or locally archived copy. A paper without online access is at risk of being ignored. "Philosophy of Logic." Edited by S. Körner ([Fix it]( [Not mine]( - This paper is not in any category. This will make it hard to find. - This paper has no associated link or locally archived copy. A paper without online access is at risk of being ignored. Sets whose members might not exist + essentialism possible worlds ([Fix it]( [Not mine]( - This paper has incomplete publication details (publication status unknown). - This paper has no abstract or summary. An author-provided summary is acceptable and recommended even if the paper has no official abstract. - This paper has no associated link or locally archived copy. A paper without online access is at risk of being ignored. Sartre - Caws,p ([Fix it]( [Not mine]( - This paper has incomplete publication details (publication status unknown). - This paper has no abstract or summary. An author-provided summary is acceptable and recommended even if the paper has no official abstract. - This paper has no associated link or locally archived copy. A paper without online access is at risk of being ignored. RESCHER, N. "A Theory of Possibility" ([Fix it]( [Not mine]( - This paper is not in any category. This will make it hard to find. - This paper has no associated link or locally archived copy. A paper without online access is at risk of being ignored. Recherches Sur la Philosophie Et le Langage X Sémantique Formelle Et Philosophie du Langage ([Fix it]( [Not mine]( - This book is not in any category. This will make it hard to find. - This book has no abstract or summary. An author-provided summary is acceptable and recommended even if the book has no official abstract. - This book has no associated link or locally archived copy. Is there a preview on Google Books? There might be nothing ([Fix it]( [Not mine]( - This paper is not in any category. This will make it hard to find. - This paper has no abstract or summary. An author-provided summary is acceptable and recommended even if the paper has no official abstract. Morality and language - Warnock,gj ([Fix it]( [Not mine]( - This paper has incomplete publication details (publication status unknown). - This paper has no abstract or summary. An author-provided summary is acceptable and recommended even if the paper has no official abstract. - This paper has no associated link or locally archived copy. A paper without online access is at risk of being ignored. Other records missing information: Stalnaker, R. C., "Inquiry" ([Fix it]( [Not mine]( - This paper has no associated link or locally archived copy. A paper without online access is at risk of being ignored. Tully, Locke, and Land ([Fix it]( [Not mine]( - This paper has no abstract or summary. An author-provided summary is acceptable and recommended even if the paper has no official abstract. - This paper has no associated link or locally archived copy. A paper without online access is at risk of being ignored. Reproductive liberty and elitist contempt: reply to John Harris ([Fix it]( [Not mine]( - This paper is not in any leaf (i.e. bottom-level) category. Avrum Stroll, Moore and Wittgenstein on Certainty ([Fix it]( [Not mine]( - This paper has no abstract or summary. An author-provided summary is acceptable and recommended even if the paper has no official abstract. - This paper has no associated link or locally archived copy. A paper without online access is at risk of being ignored. Modal fictionalism and the imagination ([Fix it]( [Not mine]( - This paper has no abstract or summary. An author-provided summary is acceptable and recommended even if the paper has no official abstract. CAWS, P. "Sartre" ([Fix it]( [Not mine]( - This paper has no associated link or locally archived copy. A paper without online access is at risk of being ignored. PLATTS, M. "Ways of Meaning" ([Fix it]( [Not mine]( - This paper has no associated link or locally archived copy. A paper without online access is at risk of being ignored. BLACKBURN, S.-Ruling Passions ([Fix it]( [Not mine]( - This paper has no abstract or summary. An author-provided summary is acceptable and recommended even if the paper has no official abstract. - This paper has no associated link or locally archived copy. A paper without online access is at risk of being ignored. Regan, T., "Bloomsbury's Prophet" ([Fix it]( [Not mine]( - This paper has no associated link or locally archived copy. A paper without online access is at risk of being ignored. The PhilPapers Team

Marketing emails from philpapers.org

View More
Sent On

28/05/2024

Sent On

24/12/2018

Sent On

21/06/2018

Sent On

30/05/2018

Sent On

10/01/2018

Sent On

20/12/2017

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2024 SimilarMail.