Newsletter Subject

Can Philanthropy Embrace Opponents as Allies?

From

philanthropy.com

Email Address

newsletter@newsletter.philanth

Sent On

Thu, May 9, 2024 06:00 PM

Email Preheader Text

Building common ground at a unusual foundation gathering; plus, the scholar nonprofits should heed T

Building common ground at a unusual foundation gathering; plus, the scholar nonprofits should heed [Philanthropy Today Logo]( This is a special weekly edition of Philanthropy Today featuring stories and content from [The Commons](. You can also [read this newsletter on the web](. If you no longer want to receive the Philanthropy Today newsletter, [unsubscribe](. [This Week in the Commons]( - Unlikely allies within philanthropy - The social scientist nonprofits should listen to - Who’s your toughest conversation? Love Thine Enemies — and Make Them Allies? From senior editor Drew Lindsay: This week’s annual meeting of the Council on Foundations in Chicago didn’t come with an instruction manual, but it could have. It was the council’s first annual meeting devoted to a single topic: building common ground. That’s a sign of the seriousness with which the organization views division in philanthropy and the need to work across differences — and disagreements, particularly with those you might consider opponents. “When we are so divided, we can’t work together on basic things that make communities better,” CEO Kathleen Enright told me before the conference. The council used the event to deliver hefty doses of training (nearly four-hour sessions!) designed to give grant makers tools to engage and communicate with a wide array of organizations and people. The goal: help them build bigger, more influential coalitions. - Read our full story: [“Opponents as Allies: The Thorny Proposition of an Unusual Foundation Gathering”]( Several experts at the conference pointed to Robert Putnam’s research as a guiding force. The Harvard scholar is famous for his book Bowling Alone, which documented Americans’ withdrawal from civic life. Less well known is The Upswing, which published during the pandemic and received far less attention amid the crisis. Yet the book proposes cures for today’s civic malaise that Putnam believes nonprofits would do well to heed. - Putnam delivers his message for philanthropy in his Commons conversation with Citizen University’s Eric Liu. [Watch video snippets]( read an excerpt, or listen to the full discussion. - Also: Eboo Patel, a Chronicle columnist and founder of Interfaith America, writes about how Putnam’s research is the foundation of his organization’s work in his essay [“Why My Nonprofit Relies on the Ideas of an 83-Year-Old Scholar.”]( Tough Talk Politics and the country’s divides can lead to difficult conversations for nonprofit leaders, whose jobs require them to talk a host of people daily. Our Rasheeda Childress talked to experts for [advice to guide those conversations]( but we also wondered: Who makes for the toughest conversations — board members, donors, staff, or the public? We’d love to get your answer. If you have a minute, [take the one-question poll posted in our Commons LinkedIn group](. SUBSCRIBE TO THE CHRONICLE [Chronicle of Philanthropy Subscription] Enjoying the newsletter? [Subscribe today]( for unlimited access to nonprofit news and analysis. Of the Moment Noteworthy news and items: - Listen: Angela Glover Blackwell, founder of PolicyLink and renowned racial-justice advocate, has launched a new podcast, [Reimagining Democracy for a Good Life]( which uses Los Angeles as a case study for how to build a multiracial democracy. - Read: The Carnegie Corporation [announced a new class of 28 Andrew Carnegie Fellows]( who will study political polarization to help build a body of research that will inform grant making and policy to strengthen democracy in the United States. Editor's Picks OPINION [Righteous Attitudes, Ideological Purity Tests, Zero-Sum Thinking: How Philanthropy Stokes Division]( By Kristen Cambell [STORY IMAGE]( Privately, anti-polarization nonprofits and practitioners say philanthropy is part of the problem. OPINION [How Nonprofits Lose Out When Volunteer Advocates Are Asked to Do Little Real Advocacy]( By Sam Daley-Harris [STORY IMAGE]( Nonprofits are feeding supporters a steady stream of petitions to sign and checks to write. They should be helping them become effective citizen-advocates. OPINION [Charitable Donors Operating in the Shadows Push Our Politics to the Extremes]( By Daniel Stid [STORY IMAGE]( Grant makers on the left and right finance a network of activists and advocates whose all-or-nothing, combative stances keep the political parties tethered to the poles. [Chronicle of Philanthropy Logo]( This newsletter was sent to {EMAIL}. [Read this newsletter on the web](. [Manage]( your newsletter preferences, [stop receiving]( this email, or [view]( our privacy policy. © 2024 [The Chronicle of Philanthropy]( 1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037

Marketing emails from philanthropy.com

View More
Sent On

04/12/2024

Sent On

07/11/2024

Sent On

07/11/2024

Sent On

31/10/2024

Sent On

29/10/2024

Sent On

29/10/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.