Newsletter Subject

Monday Musings (School is a Conveyor Belt)

From

perell.com

Email Address

david@perell.com

Sent On

Tue, Dec 20, 2022 02:03 AM

Email Preheader Text

Hi friends, Greetings from Upstate New York! I've rented a little wooden cabin for a multi-day retre

[Read in your browser here.](=) Hi friends, Greetings from Upstate New York! I've rented a little wooden cabin for a multi-day retreat to write about René Girard. On Friday, my interlocutor Johnathan Bi and I published two lectures. One about [mimetic desire and original sin](=), and another about [mimetic rivalry]( (and why it's responsible for the evil in the world). On the theme of Girard, yesterday I published one of my all-time [most popular Twitter threads](). I've included it below so I can focus on writing new stuff today. Childhood is a Conveyor Belt Modern childhood is structured like a conveyor belt. Every kid progresses at the same speed, no matter how much they learn. Follow the conveyor belt and you’ll be successful. High school leads into college, into graduate school, and then a prestigious career. Whenever I meet a college student, I ask: “Would you rather get a C in a class but actually learn the material, or an A without learning anything?” Most kids conform to conveyor belt logic and reluctantly choose the A. Sure, some students like the conveyor belt. They like knowing what they need to do and when they need to do it. Generally, these conformists are more interested in the rewards of good grades than the fruits of knowledge. They're good students and good employees. Other people, like me, loathe the conveyor belt system. They feel the rewards aren’t worth the effort. They don’t want to follow the syllabus in class and certainly don’t want their life's instructional manual to come from bureaucrats and school teachers. René Girard says there are two kinds of desire: physical and metaphysical. ​ Physical desire is wanting an object for its inherent qualities, like a glass of water because you’re thirsty — or learning for the sake of learning. This is healthy. Metaphysical desire is different. Acquiring the object only brings you joy because of the person it means you've become. You only care because of what it says about you — like learning for good grades or a diploma. This is unhealthy. People driven by metaphysical desire think achievement will bring them complete satisfaction. They think Straight A’s and an impressive job will fulfill them. But no matter what they achieve, or how much they progress down the conveyor belt, they still feel empty. The conveyor belt runs on the fuel of metaphysical desire. We copy other people's desires and mistake them for our own. Eventually, we no longer hear the whisper of our inner voice. Our desires undermine us and go against our best interests. Too many students are numb to the inherent joys of working. "Learning” is only a worthy endeavor when it helps them advance to the next stage. Their satisfactions are fleeting and followed by emptiness. Like a mirage in the desert, they never quench their thirst for achievement. In schools, there's a scarcity of physical desire and a surplus of metaphysical desire. Even after 16 years in the classroom, too many students are unaware of who they really are and what they really care for. They have no sense of curiosity and no clue what interests them. But intuitively, they know something is off. As a student recently told me: “I feel like nobody enjoys school. They all just put up with it. I feel like nobody likes this shit, and I’m at a point in my life where I can’t put up with it anymore.” Kids who follow the conveyor belt path have mirroring desires, which leads to stress and anxiety. Each year, more and more high schoolers dream of getting into Ivy League schools that promise salvation, but cap their acceptance numbers like a Berlin nightclub. With the conveyor belt mindset comes a fear of failure. Fall off and you fall behind… so don’t make any mistakes. One poor test, and their report card will be forever tainted. One poor semester, and their chances at an Ivy League education are gone. And since your advancement has capped upside, why be creative? Real life doesn’t work like this though. There is no speed limit. And an interesting life has no default path. Learning is crucial, but perfection isn't what it's cracked up to be. If we’d explicitly designed an environment for Mimetic competition, we’d build a school system like the one we have today: insane competition for limited spots, pursuit of meaningless rewards, and undifferentiated students who compete for the same scarce status symbols. ​ Meaningless prizes lead to brutal rivalries. Reflecting on his time at universities, Henry Kissinger once said: “Academic politics are so vicious because the stakes are so small.” The alternative is differentiation. Why is differentiation important? Peace and stability. People don’t envy those who are very different from them, which is why people have historically envied their neighbors and friends more than billionaires. “Love thy neighbor” can be harder than loving someone distant and the worst fighting happens amongst equals. The first line of Romeo and Juliet says: “Two houses, both alike in dignity.” The hatred between the Montagues and the Capulets is so fierce because they are so similar. For Girard, a lack of differentiation sows the seeds of violence. Facebook’s mission of connecting the world is something to fear, not celebrate. Global visibility increases the scale of imitation and the potential for Mimetic rivalry. By reducing distance between the poor and the rich, social media makes us hate billionaires. Gatsby’s parties were invite-only and reserved for the West Egg elite, while these days, Elon Musk’s private jet is tracked in real-time on Twitter. ​ Elon Musk, getting off his private jet The arc of history is leading to less differentiation. The common core has every public school student in America follow the same curriculum: SATs have them study for the same tests... the prestige of an Ivy League diploma has them apply to the same schools... and Multinational corporations have them compete for the same jobs. Nearly every college kid wants to work in the same five industries: law, tech, medicine, investing, and consulting — which is what Girard feared. They’re stuck in claustrophobic bubbles and blind to opportunities. These industries pay well, but people mostly go into them for status. Lawyers who graduate from a school outside the top-15 don't actually earn very much. But students are blind to all their options. Fueled by Mimetic contagion, they avoid high-paying industries like plumbing, traffic management, HVAC, power plant operations, and electrical engineering even though they also pay well. Law salaries follow a [bi-modal distribution](. More than half of lawyers make between $45,000 and $80,000. Only ~22 percent of lawyers make at least $190,000 annually. Almost nobody earns the mean salary of $109,469. Only [fifteen law schools]( graduated students with median earnings above $100,000. The Wall street Journal described this data of law school salaries as "the latest sign a law degree isn't a sure path to immediate success." Kids are told that riding the conveyor belt is the key to success. But schools are procrustean, individuality-smashing machines. The trophies are hollow. The grades are basically meaningless. Their rewards bring only fleeting satisfaction. Does teenage angst really surprise you? The alternative is a school system that encourages differentiation. A system where kids explore their curiosity and escape the narrow, conformity-inducing conveyor belt. That's why I'm in the cabin with Girard's philosophy. It holds the keys to rewiring our mind and escaping the traps of Mimesis. ​ Have a creative week, [David Perell Logo 2x] Thanks for reading! If you’re serious about learning to write, [sign up for my 50 days of writing series.]() I’ll send you a series of emails about every aspect of the craft, from finding new ideas, to editing your writing, to building an email list. If you'd like to update your email settings, choose one of the options below. 1. [Click here](=) to unsubscribe from Monday Musings only. 2. [Unsubscribe]( to be removed from all future mailings. That'll make me sad. But hey... I get it. You're busy. Just know that once you click this link you won't receive any more emails from me. If you want to opt-out of Monday Musings and don't see a link above to do so, just hit reply and let me know. I'll take care of it for you personally. 3. If you're interested in subscribing to my other emails, [click here](). In particular, I recommend my weekly [Friday Finds]() email. In it, I share my favorite books, articles, videos, and podcasts every week. 10900 Research Blvd Ste 160C PMB 3016, Austin, Texas 78759

EDM Keywords (203)

Marketing emails from perell.com

View More
Sent On

28/03/2024

Sent On

11/03/2024

Sent On

13/02/2024

Sent On

02/12/2023

Sent On

25/11/2023

Sent On

17/11/2023

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2024 SimilarMail.