Newsletter Subject

CNN Busted Admits Using Digitally Altered Photos Of Trump

From

patriotnewsfeed.com

Email Address

mail@patriotnewsfeed.com

Sent On

Fri, Sep 27, 2024 08:35 PM

Email Preheader Text

Caught red-handed. Well, it looks like CNN stepped in it again. This time, the network has been forc

[Logo]( [CNN Busted! Admits Using Digitally Altered Photos Of Trump] [CNN Busted! Admits Using Digitally Altered Photos Of Trump]( Caught red-handed. Well, it looks like CNN stepped in it again. This time, the network has been forced to issue an on-air retraction after airing "digitally altered" photos of former President Donald Trump and right-wing activist Laura Loomer. Yes, you read that right-CNN, the bastion of "trustworthy" journalism, showed fake photos of Trump and Loomer across multiple segments on Friday and Saturday, and it took them until afterward to realize a third party had duped them. During the retraction, a CNN host admitted, "On review, this image had been digitally altered by a third party and should not have been included. We regret the error." Well, I guess that clears it all up, right? Just a little mix-up, nothing to see here. Except this isn't just a minor blunder-this is CNN airing doctored images of a former president and a prominent conservative influencer as part of their programming. If Fox News had pulled something like this, you can bet the outrage would be deafening. WATCH: CNN [@CNN]( was just forced to issue an on air retraction after ?[@andersoncooper](? and other hosts ran fake & photoshopped pictures of me and President Trump on air last week in an effort to demonize me for the crime of flying on his plane to the Presidential debate. [pic.twitter.com/bdXJHG2doF]( - Laura Loomer (@LauraLoomer) [September 26, 2024]( Laura Loomer, never one to shy away from a fight, wasted no time calling out CNN for their latest misstep. After seeing the fake photos and CNN's rather weak apology, Loomer took to X (formerly Twitter) to express her frustration. She ripped into Anderson Cooper, specifically criticizing him for sending a female colleague to issue the on-air retraction instead of owning up to it himself. "How much of a coward do you have to be to use fake pics to defame me and @realDonaldTrump and then not apologize yourself?" Loomer wrote. Hey [@andersoncooper]( Why are you sending a female colleague of yours to apologize for your defamation? If you do not issue a retraction in writing on X for showing fake and photoshopped pics of me and President Trump in an effort to spew a sick, misogynistic, and defamatory... [( [pic.twitter.com/uFbkfcMdfa]( - Laura Loomer (@LauraLoomer) [September 26, 2024]( And she didn't stop there. Loomer put CNN on notice, making it crystal clear that if they don't issue a proper written retraction, she's prepared to take legal action. "Issue a retraction in writing and on air or else you're getting sued," she warned, adding that she's already gearing up to sue Bill Maher over a separate incident. Loomer has always been fierce, but now she's armed with receipts and ready to hit back where it hurts: in the courtroom. The real question is, how does something like this even happen at a major news network? You'd think CNN would have learned by now that trust in the media is at an all-time low, and stunts like this don't help. It's not just about Trump or Loomer-it's about basic journalistic standards. At a time when the media is quick to preach about "misinformation," it's pretty rich to see them pushing manipulated content themselves. In the end, CNN's on-air [apology]( feels like too little, too late. Their credibility-already hanging by a thread for many-is taking yet another hit. If they were hoping to avoid lawsuits and bad press, they might want to start by fact-checking their own content before it hits the airwaves. But hey, at least they "regret the error," right? [Did Zuckerberg Just Have His 'Come To Trump' Moment?] [Did Zuckerberg Just Have His 'Come To Trump' Moment?]( Didn't have this on my 2024 bingo card. [Kamala's Interview Was A Wreck, But Her Speech was Even Worse] [Kamala's Interview Was A Wreck, But Her Speech was Even Worse]( Oh my gosh - WATCH [Ewww! Biden's Creepy Comment Raises Eyebrows] [Ewww! Biden's Creepy Comment Raises Eyebrows]( OMG! - WATCH [Trump & CNN Shred Kamala Over Upcoming Visit] [Trump & CNN Shred Kamala Over Upcoming Visit]( CNN was incensed! - WATCH [CNBC Reporter Drops Reality Check On Dem Senator] [CNBC Reporter Drops Reality Check On Dem Senator]( Kamala's talking points are crashing and burning. You are receiving this email because you opted in to Patriot Newsfeed's daily newsletter. Copyright 2024. Patriot Newsfeed. All rights reserved. 30 N. Gould St, Suite 6911, Sheridan, WY 82801 [UNSUBSCRIBE]( | [VIEW IN BROWSER]( | [PRIVACY POLICY](

Marketing emails from patriotnewsfeed.com

View More
Sent On

08/12/2024

Sent On

07/12/2024

Sent On

04/12/2024

Sent On

28/11/2024

Sent On

03/11/2024

Sent On

03/11/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.