Newsletter Subject

Gold’s Got the Midas Touch Back

From

paradigmpressgroup.com

Email Address

dr@mb.paradigmpressgroup.com

Sent On

Mon, Mar 11, 2024 10:01 PM

Email Preheader Text

Why Now? | Gold?s Got the Midas Touch Back Portsmouth, New Hampshire JIM RICKARDS Dear Reader, Aft

Why Now? [The Daily Reckoning] March 11, 2024 [WEBSITE]( | [UNSUBSCRIBE]( Gold’s Got the Midas Touch Back Portsmouth, New Hampshire [Jim Rickards] JIM RICKARDS Dear Reader, After two years of trading in a 20% range between $1,600 and $2,000 per ounce, gold finally broke out to the upside, closing at a new all-time high of $2,126 per ounce on March 4. Better yet, if you’re a gold investor, gold has held its ground around $2,100 per ounce since breaking that ceiling (gold’s trading at around $2,187 today). The price is volatile, but gold broke even higher on March 5 when it hit $2,140 on an intra-day basis. Before getting too euphoric, gold investors should recall that the $800 per ounce record set in January 1980 during borderline hyperinflation would be $3,200 per ounce in today’s dollars if adjusted for inflation. That can be a splash of cold water in the face. On the other hand, it’s highly encouraging. If gold is in a new bull market, $3,200 per ounce looks more like a price target than an insurmountable hurdle. But I continually remind gold investors, whether in bullion or mining shares, not to get too euphoric when gold rallies and not to get too depressed when the dollar price retreats. Gold is still the best form of money and proves valuable to investors over time. What’s Behind the Gold Rally? Will It Last? The bigger questions are: What are the factors driving gold higher, and will they continue the trend? Some of the factors are clear. Central banks have been net buyers of gold since 2010 after being net sellers from 1970–2009. Mining output has been flat for the past eight years; it’s not shrinking but it’s not expanding either. That combination of strong demand from central banks and flat output from mining is a recipe for higher prices and a de facto floor. Some analysts point to potentially lower interest rates as a driver of higher gold prices since fixed-income instruments compete with gold (which has no yield) for investor dollars. It seems likely that the most powerful driver is the one getting the least attention. [Click here for more...]( Outright Theft! At the start of the war in Ukraine, the U.S. froze about $300 billion of U.S. Treasury securities lawfully purchased by the Russian Federation. Legally, those securities are still owned by Russia, but they cannot be sold, traded, transferred or used as collateral. (By the way, this is easy to do because all Treasury securities are held in digital form by custodians on a ledger ultimately controlled by the U.S. Treasury.) Now the U.S. is trying to seize those securities. This is outright theft. Such theft is contrary to numerous provisions of domestic and international law, but the U.S. is pushing the main custodian of those securities, Euroclear in Belgium, and European banks to amend their laws or ignore them for this purpose. Other countries are watching. China, South Korea, Japan, Saudi Arabia, Taiwan and other nations have hundreds of billions of dollars each in U.S. Treasuries in their reserve positions. Watching what the U.S. is doing to Russia is causing those countries to consider alternatives to Treasuries. That’s easier said than done. If U.S. Treasuries are in danger of being stolen, it’s not clear euro- or yen-denominated securities are any safer. Gold is the liquid, safe alternative and appeals to many investors in a world where Treasuries can be confiscated at will. $15,000 Gold? I’ve frequently forecast that gold will reach $15,000 per ounce by 2026 or sooner. That was never a guess or something I said to get attention; it was the result of rigorous analysis based on prior bull markets in gold. There’s never a guarantee that a particular outcome will prevail, but this gold price forecast is based on the best available tools and models that have proved accurate in many other contexts. This is a good time to explain exactly how that $15,000 price forecast emerged. For a technical model, we turn to the two prior bull markets in gold and compare those to the performance of the current bull market. The first bull market in gold ran from August 1971 to January 1980. The dollar price of gold rallied from $35 per ounce to $800 per ounce. That’s a 2,200% gain in 8.4 years. The Second Bull Market The second bull market in gold ran from August 1999 to August 2011. The dollar price of gold rallied from $250 per ounce to $1,900 per ounce. That’s a 670% gain in 12 years. Of course, the period after 1980 was a long bear market that lasted 19 years and saw the dollar price of gold drop 68%. The period from August 2011 to December 2015 was another bear market lasting 4.3 years that saw the dollar price of gold drop 45%. I’m not ignoring those. It’s simply the case that we’re in a new gold bull market now, so prior bull market behavior is the right reference frame for predictive analytics. [Claim a copy of the most dangerous book in America right now.]( This is the only book I’ve ever read that brings to life the horrifying fallout of a massive international currency war. A war that’s playing out as we speak. In fact, this book is so hair-raisingly accurate… I’m offering to send you a copy for free today as a way to help prepare you for what could happen next. But with only 500 copies in stock, once we are out, they could be gone for good. [Click Here To See What To Do]( Another question is why do I begin my bull/bear market analysis in 1971? Gold has been money throughout the history of civilization and has been minted in the form of gold coins since at least the sixth century B.C. The answer is that prior to 1971 either gold was money (in which case there is no other “money” to compare it to; gold was valued by weight, not exchange rates), or the world was on a gold standard in which the money price of gold was fixed (albeit with suspensions of convertibility during wars and periodic breaks due to devaluations). In a world in which gold is money or gold’s value is fixed by law, there are no bull or bear markets, although there can be inflation or deflation. The Third Bull Market The third bull market in gold began on Dec. 16, 2015, with gold hitting a bottom of $1,050 per ounce at the end of the prior bear market. Since then, gold has rallied to about $2,187 per ounce as of today. If we take a simple average of the price gains and durations of the two prior bull markets in gold, we arrive at a 1,435% gain over a period of 10.2 years. Applying that gain and duration to a baseline of $1,050 per ounce beginning in December 2015 leads to a gains projection for this bull market of $15,070 per ounce by August 2026. There’s nothing deterministic about this model. Actual gains could run ahead of this projection both in time and by amount. Conversely, the bull market could end anytime for a wide variety of reasons. The prior bull market gains could be annualized to produce a slightly lower average gain per year. Still, the bull market assumptions are moderate since I’ve taken a simple average and not stretched for the higher gain or the shorter duration of the two. Again, using the history of gold bull markets as a guide, a dollar price of gold of $15,000 per ounce in under three years is really not that big a stretch. Regards, Jim Rickards for The Daily Reckoning [feedback@dailyreckoning.com.](mailto:feedback@dailyreckoning.com) P.S. Because of what I see going on in the world right now, my team and I have put together a [“Financial War Kit.”]( I feel it could prove invaluable during a time of economic war. A war that’s unfolding at this very moment. Just a few hundred of these kits are being made available today. That’s why I urge you to get yours as soon as possible. [Click to view the contents of this kit.]( Because with one of the biggest financial wars in history heating up by the day, once the economic bombs begin to drop, I’m confident you’ll be glad you did. [Click here to see how to claim your kit.]( Thank you for reading The Daily Reckoning! We greatly value your questions and comments. Please send all feedback to [feedback@dailyreckoning.com.](mailto:feedback@dailyreckoning.com) [James G. Rickards] [James G. Rickards]( is the editor of Strategic Intelligence. He is an American lawyer, economist, and investment banker with 35 years of experience working in capital markets on Wall Street. He is the author of The New York Times bestsellers Currency Wars and The Death of Money. [Paradigm]( ☰ ⊗ [ARCHIVE]( [ABOUT]( [Contact Us]( © 2024 Paradigm Press, LLC. 1001 Cathedral Street, Baltimore, MD 21201. By submitting your email address, you consent to Paradigm Press, LLC. delivering daily email issues and advertisements. To end your The Daily Reckoning e-mail subscription and associated external offers sent from The Daily Reckoning, feel free to [click here.]( Please note: the mailbox associated with this email address is not monitored, so do not reply to this message. We welcome comments or suggestions at feedback@dailyreckoning.com. This address is for feedback only. For questions about your account or to speak with customer service, [contact us here]( or call (844)-731-0984. Although our employees may answer your general customer service questions, they are not licensed under securities laws to address your particular investment situation. No communication by our employees to you should be deemed as personalized financial advice. We allow the editors of our publications to recommend securities that they own themselves. However, our policy prohibits editors from exiting a personal trade while the recommendation to subscribers is open. In no circumstance may an editor sell a security before subscribers have a fair opportunity to exit. The length of time an editor must wait after subscribers have been advised to exit a play depends on the type of publication. All other employees and agents must wait 24 hours after on-line publication or 72 hours after the mailing of a printed-only publication prior to following an initial recommendation. Any investments recommended in this letter should be made only after consulting with your investment advisor and only after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company. The Daily Reckoning is committed to protecting and respecting your privacy. We do not rent or share your email address. Please read our [Privacy Statement.]( If you are having trouble receiving your The Daily Reckoning subscription, you can ensure its arrival in your mailbox by [whitelisting The Daily Reckoning.](

EDM Keywords (217)

yield world whitelisting weight way wars war volatile view valued value using used urge unfolding ukraine type two turn trying trend treasury treasuries trading today time theft team taken take suspensions suggestions subscribers submitting stretched stolen stock still start splash speak sooner soon something simply shrinking share send seize see security securities saw said russia reviewing result respecting reply rent recommendation recipe recall reasons really reading rallied questions pushing purpose publications publication protecting prospectus projection produce privacy prior printed price prevail playing period performance open one offering new never nations monitored money moment models minted mining message many mailing mailbox made like life licensed letter length least laws law last kits kit investors inflation ignoring ignore hundreds hundred however history held hand guide guess guarantee got gone gold glad getting get gain froze form following flat fixed feel feedback factors fact face exiting exit euphoric ensure end employees editors editor easy durations duration drop driver done domestic dollars devaluations depressed deflation deemed death day danger custodians course countries could copy convertibility contrary continue contexts contents consulting consent confiscated confident compare company communication committed combination collateral click claim civilization causing case cannot bullion bull brings bottom book billions big belgium behind begin baseline based author arrive arrival appeals answer annualized amend allow advised advertisements adjusted address account 2026 1980

Marketing emails from paradigmpressgroup.com

View More
Sent On

01/06/2024

Sent On

01/06/2024

Sent On

01/06/2024

Sent On

01/06/2024

Sent On

31/05/2024

Sent On

31/05/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2024 SimilarMail.