One Step Closer to War

U.S. Troops Killed in Drone Strike [The Daily Reckoning] January 29, 2024 [WEBSITE]( | [UNSUBSCRIBE]( One Step Closer to War Portsmouth, New Hampshire [Jim Rickards] JIM RICKARDS Dear Reader, Three U.S. military personnel were tragically killed and at least 34 wounded over the weekend in a drone attack on their base in northern Jordan. It’s not yet clear who carried out the attack, but an Iranian-backed militia in the region is likely responsible. Prominent voices like Sen. Lindsey Graham are already calling for powerful retaliation against Iran. No surprise there. For years, warmongers like Graham have been itching for war with Iran. This incident is just the latest pretext. For his part, Joe Biden has said, “We will hold all those responsible to account at a time and in a manner of our choosing.” We’ll have to see what that response will be and when it’ll happen. Meanwhile, two U.S. Navy SEALs died off Yemen recently, ostensibly by drowning in heavy seas after a failed attempt to board a ship suspected of carrying Iranian weapon supplies to the Houthis. So the U.S. is now suffering casualties in the latest Middle East conflict. Of course, this latest attack is not an isolated or random incident. It takes place against the backdrop of larger events, beginning with the war in Gaza. One Thing Leads to Another Israel responded to the Oct. 7 Hamas terrorist attacks that killed over 1,000 people by launching powerful military operations against Hamas in Gaza, which are ongoing. To retaliate against Israel’s response in Gaza, Iranian-backed Houthi rebels, operating in Yemen, began targeting shipping in the Red Sea that was headed for Israel. Yemen sits adjacent to the Bab al-Mandeb strait, a critical sea lane linking Europe to Asia, and through which much of the world's oil is shipped. But the Houthis have also attacked Red Sea shipping without any clear connection to Israel. To avoid attack, ships have been forced to reroute all the way around the southern tip of Africa, adding weeks of transit time and driving up shipping costs by as much as 25%. [A $588.88 Credit Has Been Applied To Your Account.]( [Click here for more...]( — Customer Service, Paradigm Press [Click Here To Learn How To Claim It]( The U.S. Navy to the Rescue — Sort Of The U.S. Navy was dispatched to the area to protect Red Sea shipping against Houthi attacks. And it has defeated some attacks by shooting down Houthi drones and missiles. But this has come at a cost. The air defense missiles the Navy is using to shoot down Houthi drones cost about $2 million each. Meanwhile, the drones the Houthis are using only cost about a couple of thousand dollars. Plus, it’s standard Navy practice to launch two missiles against each incoming target in order to increase the chances of a kill. So you’re spending $4 million to bring down a $2,000 drone. That’s not exactly cost-efficient. And since Navy destroyers only carry so many air defense missiles, concentrated and sustained attacks by cheap drones could eventually deplete Navy magazines. The ships would have to withdraw to port in order to rearm before other ships can be rotated in. That also means no aircraft carriers in the area since carriers don’t operate without escorts. Just imagine the propaganda value of a ragtag group of Houthi rebels driving the mighty U.S. Navy from the Red Sea! Meanwhile, the U.S. also led cruise missile attacks on Houthi positions in Yemen, which don’t appear to have been particularly effective. Houthi attacks on Red Sea shipping continue. Another Gulf of Tonkin Incident? We’ll have to see how events play out, but there’s a serious risk of escalation that could spiral into a wider regional war. For example, what if a Houthi drone or anti-ship missile slips through U.S. defenses, sinking or seriously damaging a Navy ship and killing scores of U.S. sailors? U.S. retaliation against Iran would likely be swift and severe. Would Iran itself retaliate by closing the Strait of Hormuz, essentially choking off global oil flows? We could be heading for something resembling the 1964 Gulf of Tonkin incident, which was used to justify broader U.S. engagement in Vietnam. North Vietnamese patrol boats supposedly attacked U.S. destroyers in two separate engagements, although it’s unclear one of the attacks even happened. In the other engagement, one U.S. destroyer may have taken a few machine gun rounds. In either case, it’s not difficult to imagine that an incident in the Red Sea, real or imagined, could lead to a direct military confrontation between the U.S. and Iran. That would open a second front for Israel, as the Iranian-backed group Hezbollah would likely attack Israel from its base in Lebanon. Turkey, a key U.S. ally but also a strong critic of the Israeli response in Gaza, could even become involved. Who knows what would happen next? Needless to say, a wider Middle East conflict would carry serious implications for the global economy. [Offer Pending: Please confirm your address…]( Your name is on a list of people eligible to claim the “most dangerous book in America.” We with only 500 copies left, we may run out of stock soon. So, here’s how to claim your copy: - [Click this link to watch Jim's short message.]( - Review your account information. - Confirm you’d like to accept Jim’s offer. And I’ll get your copy of the most dangerous book in the mail right away. [Click Here To Learn More]( The Threat of $200 Oil The uncertainty of the war in Gaza has been enough to put a floor under oil prices although oil has not soared as some expected when the war began. There are strong deflationary and disinflationary forces trying to push the oil price lower, including reduced gasoline consumption in the U.S. and the likelihood of a U.S. recession in the near future. The downward pull of disinflation and the upward push from the war have been kept in balance and the price of oil has remained relatively steady. That will change radically if the war escalates. Then oil prices of $120 per barrel or much higher are not out of the question. Even if attacks on Iran are measured, at least by U.S. definitions, it could be enough to cause Iran to close the Straits of Hormuz, interdicting oil shipments from Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and the UAE among others points. At that point, oil prices will easily go even higher, possibly to $200 per barrel or more. Western economies including the U.S. will immediately suffer a drastic recession worse than the 2020 pandemic crash, and likely worse than the 2008 global financial crisis. U.S. “Leadership” Of course, this form of extreme escalation could be prevented by strong leadership by the U.S. If the U.S. had not provoked the war in Ukraine, it would be possible to reach out to Russia in a way that would allow Russia and the U.S. to use diplomacy with Iran and Israel to avoid escalation. Unfortunately, the U.S. has the weakest foreign policy team perhaps ever, beginning with a senile and stupid president and continuing through intellectual lightweights like Jake Sullivan and Tony Blinken and warmongers like Victoria Nuland. We’ve burned our bridges with Russia over Ukraine and have no credibility left in the Middle East. The U.S. is practically a bystander due to weak leaders when it should be leading the efforts to avoid escalation. Events are heading toward further escalation. The worst-case scenario is by no means inevitable, but we need to be prepared for it. The U.S. seems to have no ability or will to mitigate what could possibly be unfolding. The latest attack on U.S. troops only raises the stakes. Buckle in. Regards, Jim Rickards for The Daily Reckoning [feedback@dailyreckoning.com.](mailto:feedback@dailyreckoning.com) P.S. We may be at the tipping point of a grave global situation… And here in the U.S., we need to be prepared to lose our status as the world’s reserve currency. It won’t happen overnight — that’s not how things work in the real world — but the process is accelerating in ways many would have thought impossible just a few years ago. Some of the biggest nations in the world — China, Russia and Turkey included — are actively seeking alternatives to the U.S. dollar. This could potentially shatter the global monetary system as we know it, igniting a full-blown currency war across the globe that could devastate the U.S. economy. [My publisher, Paradigm Press]( has a responsibility to make sure you’re actively prepared for a situation as dire as this. That’s exactly what I spoke with them about… And they agreed to offer a [$588.88 credit [ACCESS HERE]]( for a select 1% of its readership to test-drive a unique strategy. It’s a completely new way to invest during the ongoing currency war… and targets profits that are potentially 50–100 times bigger than what people see trading the stock market. Please take a look so you can decide if it makes sense for you. [click here for more...]( This credit won’t last forever, so [go here now to claim it.]( Thank you for reading The Daily Reckoning! We greatly value your questions and comments. Please send all feedback to [feedback@dailyreckoning.com.](mailto:feedback@dailyreckoning.com) [Jim Rickards] [James G. Rickards]( is the editor of Strategic Intelligence. He is an American lawyer, economist, and investment banker with 35 years of experience working in capital markets on Wall Street. He is the author of The New York Times bestsellers Currency Wars and The Death of Money. [Paradigm]( ☰ ⊗ [ARCHIVE]( [ABOUT]( [Contact Us]( © 2024 Paradigm Press, LLC. 1001 Cathedral Street, Baltimore, MD 21201. By submitting your email address, you consent to Paradigm Press, LLC. delivering daily email issues and advertisements. To end your The Daily Reckoning e-mail subscription and associated external offers sent from The Daily Reckoning, feel free to [click here.]( Please note: the mailbox associated with this email address is not monitored, so do not reply to this message. We welcome comments or suggestions at feedback@dailyreckoning.com. This address is for feedback only. For questions about your account or to speak with customer service, [contact us here]( or call (844)-731-0984. Although our employees may answer your general customer service questions, they are not licensed under securities laws to address your particular investment situation. No communication by our employees to you should be deemed as personalized financial advice. We allow the editors of our publications to recommend securities that they own themselves. However, our policy prohibits editors from exiting a personal trade while the recommendation to subscribers is open. In no circumstance may an editor sell a security before subscribers have a fair opportunity to exit. The length of time an editor must wait after subscribers have been advised to exit a play depends on the type of publication. All other employees and agents must wait 24 hours after on-line publication or 72 hours after the mailing of a printed-only publication prior to following an initial recommendation. Any investments recommended in this letter should be made only after consulting with your investment advisor and only after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company. The Daily Reckoning is committed to protecting and respecting your privacy. We do not rent or share your email address. Please read our [Privacy Statement.]( If you are having trouble receiving your The Daily Reckoning subscription, you can ensure its arrival in your mailbox by [whitelisting The Daily Reckoning.](