Newsletter Subject

ETHGate: Fraud Bigger Than FTX?

From

paradigmpressgroup.com

Email Address

AltucherConfidential@mb.paradigmpressgroup.com

Sent On

Mon, Nov 20, 2023 10:30 PM

Email Preheader Text

?Jekyll Island on steroids.? | 📈📈📈📈📈📈📈📈

“Jekyll Island on steroids.” [Altucher Confidential] November 20, 2023 [WEBSITE]( | [UNSUBSCRIBE]( 📈📈📈📈📈📈📈📈 Publisher’s Note: Trading is back! With inflation cooling, Wall Street is feeling more confident — pushing the markets higher. It’s creating the perfect conditions to score some big, fast profits from surprising stock moves. And our resident Trading Expert, Greg Guenthner, is ready to guide you to the best opportunities. So we’re inviting you to watch LIVE as Greg shares his next top trade of the week. Mark your calendar for Tuesday, Nov. 21, at 11 a.m. ET to join his LIVE interactive broadcast. And put away your wallet, because this Zoom is completely free to attend. [Just click here to sign up for Greg’s Top Trades LIVE, Tuesday, Nov. 21, at 11 a.m. ET.]( Clicking the link above automatically registers you for the free e-letter Top Trades Live, but does not obligate you in any way to attend the live Zoom event. By reserving your spot, you will receive event updates along with the Top Trades Live e-letter. We will not share your email address with anyone. And you can opt out at any time. [Privacy Policy.]( 📈📈📈📈📈📈📈📈 Did the ETH Foundation really commit "fraud bigger than FTX"? [Hero_Image] ETHGate: Fraud Bigger Than FTX? By Chris Campbell [Chris Campbell] CHRIS CAMPBELL Dear Reader, In 2018, the SEC’s official stance -- espoused by Bill Hinman, SEC’s director of the Division of Corporate Finance -- was that Bitcoin and Ethereum were not securities. You might’ve been one of many people who either agreed or disagreed with him back then. But that was the official SEC stance. He said on CNBC: “We're comfortable in some sort of viewing these as items that don't have to be regulated as securities.” Hinman explained that the key determinant for a crypto being a security was the presence of a third-party promoter and the expectation of a financial return from their efforts. An example of a third-party promoter in a traditional security would be a company's executive team or its founders when they are raising capital through an initial public offering (IPO). The Howey Test helps make this decision. It looks at whether investors expect to make money mainly from the promoter's work. According to Hinman… In Bitcoin and Ethereum's case, their value and operation are determined by a collective network of participants, not by a central authority, aligning with the Howey Test's criteria for non-securities. You can [watch him explain this on CNBC right here](. [image 1] Again, you can disagree with his opinion or you can agree with it. Either way, that was the stance of the SEC in 2018. Recently, there’s been speculation that shady backdoor deals were involved between the Ethereum Foundation and Bill Hinman. And that some of the founders of Ethereum didn’t believe Ethereum could truly have been called “decentralized” at that point in its evolution, despite what Hinman said. This is known as “ETHGate.” And here’s why there’s a lot of talk of it on the X-bird app right now. [External Advertisement] Musk Building New World Order of Finance… The brightest minds in crypto aren't putting their focus on Bitcoin right now… No, the coins that they are buying up like CRAZY are actually smaller coins known as 'Altcoins…' Some of these coins have been projected to make moves up to 1,000x during the coming bull run. You'll learn all about these unbelievable opportunities at the upcoming free online event [The Crypto Community Summit.]( We've gathered 27 of the world's top crypto experts to share their top picks and predictions as we see our financial system changing before our eyes. [Click here to register now.]( “Fraud Bigger Than FTX” Over a week ago, former Ethereum Foundation advisor Steven Nerayoff (@StevenNerayoff on X) implied he had information that would reveal a “fraud bigger than FTX." Nerayoff posted article links to that effect, implying he was about to release a “bombshell.” [image 2] The crypto news feeds went wild. On a live Spaces call, Nerayoff said he would release the proof within a few days. Well, true to his word, he did release… something. But it wasn’t what many of his followers expected. He released a series of conversations with Ethereum founder Vitalik Buterin in 2014. In the transcripts, Nerayoff offered his opinions on the Ethereum Foundation. I read through the transcript. The conversation consists of challenges Ethereum was facing, potential strategies for restructuring, and addressing various organizational, legal, and financial issues. I didn’t find anything by way of SBF-level fraud. Since its release, Nerayoff has backpedaled a bit, saying this is just an interesting piece of Ethereum history and to show his early involvement in Ethereum. He wrote: “The recording isn’t directly related to the fraud but will illuminate a lot of what was happening & show my involvement. The fraud will be in the lawsuit.” One might wonder why he didn’t say that from the outset. But I suspect the answer is fairly obvious: “Fraud Bigger Than FTX” gets eyeballs. “Interesting Ethereum History” doesn’t. Nerayoff has since implied he has evidence of something more "insidious than Jekyll Island." And that when he "can tell the full story people will be shocked." It's much worse than you can imagine, he says: "Jekyll Island on steroids." Pretty bold statements. If he truly does have something groundbreaking, the Ethereum price isn’t listening. Dump Incoming? My quick take… The concerns voiced in the recordings do not equate to concrete proof of fraud. If anything, they reveal Vitalik Buterin’s eagerness to make sure their bases were covered. Always undersell and overdeliver. Nerayoff did the opposite. Ethereum shrugged. I don’t claim to have any special knowledge on what Nerayoff is going to do next, but I suspect Ethereum is going to be fine. Most of the time, stories like these are noise. That said… We’re keeping a close eye. Until tomorrow, [Chris Campbell] Chris Campbell For Altucher Confidential Urgent Note From James – Response Requested By Tomorrow at Midnight [Click here for more...]( Hey, it’s James. [I just made a massive change to my Altucher’s Investment Network newsletter.]( This is one of the biggest changes to a newsletter in the history of our business… As far as I know, nothing like it has ever been done before. What’s going on? In short, I’m adding 3 brand-new benefits to this all-new “Pro level” of Altucher’s Investment Network. And as one of my readers, I’d hate to see you left behind. That’s why – for a very limited time, until the timer below hits 0 – [you’ll be able to upgrade your current subscription to this new “Pro level” by clicking here.]( [timer]( [Seriously. Just click here now to see how to claim your upgrade.]( [Paradigm]( ☰ ⊗ [ARCHIVE]( [ABOUT]( [Contact Us]( © 2023 Paradigm Press, LLC. 808 Saint Paul Street, Baltimore MD 21202. By submitting your email address, you consent to Paradigm Press, LLC. delivering daily email issues and advertisements. To end your Altucher Confidential e-mail subscription and associated external offers sent from Altucher Confidential, feel free to [click here.]( Please note: the mailbox associated with this email address is not monitored, so do not reply to this message. We welcome comments or suggestions at feedback@altucherconfidential.com. This address is for feedback only. For questions about your account or to speak with customer service, [contact us here]( or call (844)-731-0984. Although our employees may answer your general customer service questions, they are not licensed under securities laws to address your particular investment situation. No communication by our employees to you should be deemed as personalized financial advice. We allow the editors of our publications to recommend securities that they own themselves. However, our policy prohibits editors from exiting a personal trade while the recommendation to subscribers is open. In no circumstance may an editor sell a security before subscribers have a fair opportunity to exit. The length of time an editor must wait after subscribers have been advised to exit a play depends on the type of publication. All other employees and agents must wait 24 hours after on-line publication or 72 hours after the mailing of a printed-only publication prior to following an initial recommendation. Any investments recommended in this letter should be made only after consulting with your investment advisor and only after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company. Altucher Confidential is committed to protecting and respecting your privacy. We do not rent or share your email address. Please read our [Privacy Statement.]( If you are having trouble receiving your Altucher Confidential subscription, you can ensure its arrival in your mailbox by [whitelisting Altucher Confidential.](

EDM Keywords (191)

Marketing emails from paradigmpressgroup.com

View More
Sent On

08/12/2024

Sent On

08/12/2024

Sent On

07/12/2024

Sent On

07/12/2024

Sent On

06/12/2024

Sent On

06/12/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.