Newsletter Subject

The Three Wisest Words on Earth

From

paradigmpressgroup.com

Email Address

dr@mb.paradigmpressgroup.com

Sent On

Wed, Aug 30, 2023 10:28 PM

Email Preheader Text

They?re Not What You Think | The Three Wisest Words on Earth - ?I don?t know?? - The belie

They’re Not What You Think [The Daily Reckoning] August 30, 2023 [WEBSITE]( | [UNSUBSCRIBE]( The Three Wisest Words on Earth - “I don’t know”… - The believer vs. the scientist… - 500 climate scientists say there is no climate emergency… [[LEAKED MEMO] AI Opportunity]( A leaked memo from Google on AI could prove that it's the biggest opportunity of the decade. [Click here for more...]( Silicon Valley insider, James Altucher, shows that a tiny AI company could be in the crosshairs of major NASDAQ players — and a buyout deal could be announced at any moment. And if you don’t get in this stock before a potential deal is announced... You’ll miss out for good. Take a look at this research, and this urgent buy alert, before it’s too late. [Click Here To Watch Now]( Annapolis, Maryland [Brian Maher] BRIAN MAHER Dear Reader, “I don’t know.” These are the three wisest words in the English tongue — or any other tongue. These are the words of an honest man. A man may think. A man may believe. Yet a man does not know. This ignorance — that a man does not know — is this publication’s central assumption. Nor do we believe that anyone else knows. Imagine if politicians bowed before these three words. Imagine if market experts bowed before these three words. Imagine if the media bowed before these three words. We hazard this world would run to far saner settings. Who Wants to Hear That? Yet the world’s three wisest words — “I don’t know” — are likewise its three most unpopular words. That is because the human being hunts for certainty. Uncertainty disturbs and unsettles him. He does not like it. Who will heed the man who concedes that he does not know? Who will follow him? “Will we win this war, Mr. President?” “I don’t know.” ”Does God exist, Pastor?” “I don’t know.” “Does God exist, Mr. Atheist?” “I don’t know.” Often — not always but often — a man’s certitude precisely equals his ignorance. Does the pastor know that God has existence? Does the atheist know that God has no existence? Each fellow is perfectly ignorant. Yet each is certain as steel. The concession of “I don’t know” renders them instant agnostics. And the vast majority of men do not wish to be agnostics. They wish to believe. They must believe in something — even anything. The late G.K. Chesterton hooked onto something when he wrote: When men choose not to believe in God, they do not thereafter believe in nothing, they then become capable of believing in anything. “Is Human-Induced Climate Emergency Real, Mr. Activist?” Above we referenced certain questions. We now raise our own: “Is human-induced climate emergency real, Mr. Activist?” Will “I don’t know” come issuing from his lips? It is extremely unlikely. That is because such a concession would disarm him instantly. All zeal, all fire would extinguish in his belly. He would cease to be a believer. Doubt would breach his perimeter… and soon overrun his position. This he will not permit. What unseen bugaboo explains the Hawaiian wildfires? Climate emergency, shrieks the believer. What unseen bugaboo explains the tempest presently besieging Florida? Climate emergency, howls the believer. What unseen bugaboo will explain the next earthly disaster — and the one after that one? His answer is once again climate emergency. May we introduce you to one such creature? [TIME-SENSITIVE: A “Second Wave” Of Inflation Is Coming]( [Click here for more...]( During the 1970s, inflation lasted for years and came in three separate waves. Each wave was far worse than the last. Today, the same exact thing is happening again. Is the price of food, gasoline, housing and more about to skyrocket even higher? [Click Here To Find Out]( Rage Against “Climate Deniers” A certain Glenn C. Altschuler professes American Studies at Cornell University. He has authored an article under this title: “Climate Deniers Are Entitled to Their Own Opinions, but Not Their Own Facts.” From which: 2023 is likely to be the hottest year on record, and possibly the hottest in 100,000 years. Virtually all climate scientists agree that human activities (i.e. the release of carbon dioxide and methane into the atmosphere) have warmed the surface of the Earth and ocean basins, and affected extreme weather events. We are subsequently instructed in the manifold calamities of climate emergency. These include savage wildfires… droughts… hurricanes… floods. Concludes this fact-follower: Some climate deniers, it seems clear, are willfully or invincibly ignorant. These people must not be allowed to prevent the rest of us from addressing a clear, present, extraordinarily well-documented and existential threat to the United States — and to planet Earth. Just so. Yet is a doctoral degree in American Studies — so-called — a doctoral degree in the atmospheric sciences? By every reasonable measure it is not. Where then are his facts? Is he not merchanting an opinion himself? Does the pot not label the kettle black? Even if he held a doctorate in the atmospheric sciences… would he truly know? True Science Science — contrary to the claims of the Dr. Faucis of this world — is never “settled.” Scientific theory may be validated by experimentation. Yet scientific theory can never be proven. Against every scientific theory flaws relentlessly conspire. They merely await their chance. One of these flaws can render invalid an entire theory. The scientist never truly knows. Thus science — authentic science — is the avowed enemy of belief. Politicized science… political science… is the bedfellow of belief. This Altschuler fellow claims the present year may prove the hottest in 100,000 years. Assume for the moment that the claim proves valid. Yet we must inquire: Why was Earth this hot 100,000 years ago? Where was the internal-combustion engine? And if warming yields additional warming… which yields additional warming… which yields additional warming… until Earth cooks… as the catastrophists believe… how did Earth ever cool? We request a square answer. [Grid Monitor Warns: Will The U.S. Power Grid Fail Nationwide?]( [Click here for more...]( The U.S. power grid is under immense stress – and according to this video, your area could be set to experience rolling blackouts. They’ve already begun across the country – in Texas, California, Florida, North Carolina and more. The grid monitor just issued a “sobering” report of blackout risks across the U.S. And research shows rolling blackouts could soon come to your area. Because of that, I encourage you to prepare right away. This might be your last chance to do so. [Click Here Now]( “Virtually All Climate Scientists Agree” This Altschuler claims, in reminder: Virtually all climate scientists agree that human activities (i.e. the release of carbon dioxide and methane into the atmosphere) have warmed the surface of the Earth and ocean basins, and affected extreme weather events. Virtually all climate scientists agree? We are informed — reliably — that “virtually all climate scientists” do not agree. Five hundred climate scientists authored a thing called the European Climate Declaration. They addressed it to the United Nations Secretary-General. And it read: A global network of more than 500 knowledgeable and experienced scientists and professionals in climate and related fields have… [determined that] the general-circulation models of climate on which international policy is at present founded are unfit for their purpose. Therefore, it is cruel as well as imprudent to advocate the squandering of trillions of dollars on the basis of results from such immature models… We urge you to follow a climate policy based on sound science, realistic economics and genuine concern for those harmed by costly but unnecessary attempts at mitigation. More: The Little Ice Age ended as recently as 1850. Therefore, it is no surprise that we now are experiencing a period of warming. Only very few peer-reviewed papers even go so far as to say that recent warming is chiefly anthropogenic… The world has warmed at less than half the originally predicted rate, and at less than half the rate to be expected on the basis of net anthropogenic forcing… Climate models have many shortcomings and are not remotely plausible as policy tools. Moreover, they most likely exaggerate the effect of greenhouse gases such as CO2… There is no statistical evidence that global warming is intensifying hurricanes, floods, droughts and suchlike natural disasters, or making them more frequent… There is no climate emergency. Therefore, there is no cause for panic and alarm. Yet, again, Mr. Altschuler informs us that “virtually all climate scientists agree.” Five hundred climate scientists manifestly do not agree. Are these 500 renegades correct? Are they incorrect? We lack the scientific credentialism to judge one way or the other. We Know Only That We Don’t Know What do we know? We know… beyond all question… only that we do not know. Yet this we do know: 500 climate scientists harpoon the “climate emergency” theory. We know that “virtually all climate scientists” do not agree. We hazard these 500 are elaborately more informed about the atmospheric sciences than a professor of American Studies at Cornell University. They have proked, prodded and probed the climate emergency theory. And they have found it riddled through with boo-boos. Their findings are available publicly. Mr. Altschuler is free to consult them. We hazard he has not… and will not. For this fellow is a believer. Thus this fellow is a menace. That is because the world’s greatest atrocities are perpetrated by believers — believers in God, disbelievers in God, believers in the equality of man, believers in this, believers in that… Believers in “settled science.” May the Lord deliver us from the believers among us. May He cram their mouths with three wise words: “I don’t know.” Regards, [Brian Maher] Brian Maher Managing Editor, The Daily Reckoning [feedback@dailyreckoning.com.](mailto:feedback@dailyreckoning.com) Editor’s note: If you live in many areas of the U.S., [a MAJOR new emergency]( could be coming to your area. That’s because the U.S. power grid is under immense stress — [and according to this video]( your city could be set to experience rolling blackouts. They’ve already begun across the country — in Texas, California, Florida, North Carolina and more. Now the grid monitor just issued a “sobering” report of blackout risks across the U.S. Will your neighborhood be next? It’s hard to say, but we urge you to take a moment and check out this urgent warning right away… And even if it doesn’t happen and we’re simply crying wolf, you should prepare anyway because this information might come in handy one day. [Click here for details.]( Thank you for reading The Daily Reckoning! We greatly value your questions and comments. Please send all feedback to [feedback@dailyreckoning.com.](mailto:feedback@dailyreckoning.com) [Brian Maher] [Brian Maher]( is the Daily Reckoning's Managing Editor. Before signing on to Agora Financial, he was an independent researcher and writer who covered economics, politics and international affairs. His work has appeared in the Asia Times and other news outlets around the world. He holds a Master's degree in Defense & Strategic Studies. [Paradigm]( ☰ ⊗ [ARCHIVE]( [ABOUT]( [Contact Us]( © 2023 Paradigm Press, LLC. 808 Saint Paul Street, Baltimore MD 21202. By submitting your email address, you consent to Paradigm Press, LLC. delivering daily email issues and advertisements. To end your The Daily Reckoning e-mail subscription and associated external offers sent from The Daily Reckoning, feel free to [click here.]( Please note: the mailbox associated with this email address is not monitored, so do not reply to this message. We welcome comments or suggestions at feedback@dailyreckoning.com. This address is for feedback only. For questions about your account or to speak with customer service, [contact us here]( or call (844)-731-0984. Although our employees may answer your general customer service questions, they are not licensed under securities laws to address your particular investment situation. No communication by our employees to you should be deemed as personalized financial advice. We allow the editors of our publications to recommend securities that they own themselves. However, our policy prohibits editors from exiting a personal trade while the recommendation to subscribers is open. In no circumstance may an editor sell a security before subscribers have a fair opportunity to exit. The length of time an editor must wait after subscribers have been advised to exit a play depends on the type of publication. All other employees and agents must wait 24 hours after on-line publication or 72 hours after the mailing of a printed-only publication prior to following an initial recommendation. Any investments recommended in this letter should be made only after consulting with your investment advisor and only after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company. The Daily Reckoning is committed to protecting and respecting your privacy. We do not rent or share your email address. Please read our [Privacy Statement.]( If you are having trouble receiving your The Daily Reckoning subscription, you can ensure its arrival in your mailbox by [whitelisting The Daily Reckoning.](

EDM Keywords (239)

zeal yet years wrote writer world work words wish win willfully whitelisting well wave watch warming warmed wants virtually video validated us urge unsettles unfit type trillions tongue time three think take surprise surface suggestions subscribers submitting stock steel squandering speak signing share set security say riddled reviewing results rest respecting research request reply rent release record recommendation recently reading read rate raise rage questions question publications publication proven protecting prospectus professor professionals probed privacy printed price prevent pot possibly position perpetrated permit period perimeter panic opinions opinion open one often nothing note next never neighborhood mouths monitored moment mitigation miss might methane message merchanting menace men master man making mailing mailbox made look live lips likewise likely like licensed letter less length lack label know issued introduce instantly informed inflation incorrect imprudent ignorance hunts human however hottest holds held heed hear hazard harmed hard happening happen half google god get frequent free found following follow flaws findings find fellow feedback far facts explain experiencing expected exiting exit existence even equality entitled ensure end encourage employees elaborately effect editors earth dollars doctorate determined degree deemed cruel crosshairs cram country costly consulting consult consent concession concedes company communication committed coming co2 climate click claims check certain cause came called belly believing believers believer believe belief bedfellow basis authored atmosphere article arrival area appeared anything answer announced always allowed allow agree agnostics advocate advised advertisements addressing addressed address account according 500 2023

Marketing emails from paradigmpressgroup.com

View More
Sent On

08/12/2024

Sent On

08/12/2024

Sent On

07/12/2024

Sent On

07/12/2024

Sent On

06/12/2024

Sent On

06/12/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.