Newsletter Subject

Will Trump Survive This?

From

paradigmpressgroup.com

Email Address

dr@mb.paradigmpressgroup.com

Sent On

Tue, Apr 30, 2024 09:36 PM

Email Preheader Text

The Stakes Are Enormous | Will Trump Survive This? Portsmouth, New Hampshire New AI Discovery Will B

The Stakes Are Enormous [The Daily Reckoning] April 30, 2024 [WEBSITE]( | [UNSUBSCRIBE]( Will Trump Survive This? Portsmouth, New Hampshire [Jim Rickards] JIM RICKARDS Dear Reader, This is a highly consequential election year, to say the least. The policy differences between Biden and Trump are enormous. Whether it’s taxes, regulation, borders, energy or foreign policy, the differences couldn’t be clearer. And though I prefer to focus my analysis on markets alone, I can’t. These days especially, politics plays too great a role in how markets behave. But this year’s election is about far more than policy. In the past, the D.C. establishment could live with a typical Republican or Democrat. They knew neither candidate would rock the boat too much if he got elected. Both candidates were cut from the same basic cloth and played by the accepted rules. But all that goes out the window with Trump. He’s the most polarizing political figure we’ve seen in our lifetimes. You’d probably have to go back to Andrew Jackson to find a parallel. And it’s clear that Trump’s political enemies will stop at nothing to keep him out of the White House this time. Lawfare “Lawfare” is their primary tactic. They just want to get Trump convicted of a felony before the election so they can brand him a criminal, believing that the American public won’t elect a convicted felon. They don’t care if the conviction is subsequently overturned by a higher court. The damage will already be done. And if it trashes the Constitution, Trump’s political enemies are prepared to live with that. They’re convinced that Trump is the equivalent of Hitler and that he’ll destroy democracy if he’s elected. So in their minds, the ends justify the means. They’ll justify any action, legal or illegal, to ensure his defeat. They don’t seem to realize that the harder they go after Trump with bogus charges, the more popular he becomes. I’m not here to defend Trump or oppose him. No doubt, he’s a deeply flawed character with personality traits that alienate many people. But voters don’t expect a billionaire real estate magnate from New York City to be a saint. They vote for him because they think he can get things done. And under honest democratic elections, the administrative state, or deep state, whatever you want to call it, stays out of it. But that’s not the system we have today. And that should concern every American, regardless of his or her political affiliation. Again, it doesn’t matter if you love Trump or hate him. But in a democracy, the people rule. Not the bureaucrats. And if the people elect Trump, then he should be allowed to enact the policies that got him elected. That didn’t happen when he won in 2016. [AI Discovery Leaves Oncologists Speechless: Has One Tiny Company Just Found The TRUE Cause Of Cancer?]( New AI Discovery Will Blow You Away… [Click here for more...]( [>> Click Here Now For The Urgent Details <<]( [Click Here To Learn More]( Stop Trump! The first two years of his administration were hobbled by the fake Russian collusion hoax and the numerous investigations that resulted. Those investigations showed that there was no collusion between Trump and Russia, but Trump’s enemies didn’t care (and certainly did not apologize). They just moved on to the next fake scandal, which was the first impeachment over a brief phone call to Ukrainian President Zelenskyy asking about Biden family corruption. It turns out that Biden family corruption was rampant in Ukraine, but that didn’t stop phony “whistleblowers” (actually lawbreakers) like Eric Ciaramella from leaking classified transcripts to Adam Schiff to get the impeachment process going. Trump was acquitted by the Senate. Then came the second impeachment where Trump was also acquitted. Since leaving office, Trump has been hit with federal criminal charges relating to Jan. 6 and the Mar-a-Lago raid, as well as state criminal charges in New York and Georgia. Trump’s enemies never quit. They’re also going after Trump’s advisers and confidants. It’s meant to isolate Trump because anyone who advises him will fear they’ll be hauled into court on some bogus charge and have to spend a fortune on lawyers, win or lose. The latest lawfare tactic has been unveiled against Trump attorney John Eastman. It’s called “debanking.” Good Luck Living Without a Bank In Eastman’s case, it started with Bank of America closing his bank accounts for no good reason and with no recourse. Then he turned to his accounts at USAA, which specializes in accounts for military veterans and their families. Shortly thereafter, USAA also closed Eastman’s bank accounts. We tend to take banking services for granted and don’t think much about what would happen if we were shut out of the banking system. No checks, no savings accounts, no wire transfers, no ATMs, no bank-issued credit cards, no lines of credit or mortgages, etc. It’s like trying to survive without food or water. It’s impossible. And that’s the whole point. It’s designed to make the victim’s life miserable. The same thing happened in the U.K. when NatWest and Coutts debanked Nigel Farage, leader of the Brexit movement. Farage fought back and the CEO of NatWest was eventually fired over the incident. But it was a brutal fight and a tough transition for Farage when he suddenly found himself debanked. Unfortunately, debanking is just an extension of the “woke” cancel culture that’s taken root in much of the West. Shut up, Bigot! When we look around at places like New Zealand and Scotland, there seems to be a bizarre competition to see which country can pass the most fascist laws and imitate George Orwell’s dystopia in Nineteen Eighty-Four in the least amount of time. Scotland has imposed so-called hate crime laws that subject you to imprisonment for exercising free speech if it happens to offend a long list of protected parties. No actual violence or physical act is needed. If you simply say the wrong thing, you can be arrested, fined and imprisoned for “inciting hate.” [Urgent Publisher Warning]( Hi, I’m Matt Insley. I’m the Publisher at Paradigm Press. Today, I have [bad news to share]( regarding the future of Jim Rickards’ newsletter. [>> Click here now for my announcement.]( [Click Here To Learn More]( A similar law has just passed in Ireland. The Polish government wants to pass a law that makes it a crime to “defame” members of the LBGT community. Of course, the term “defame” is ill-defined and is in the eye of the beholder. Any choice of words, even if derogatory or hurtful by some standard, should be protected by free speech provisions. But in Poland, it may soon land you in jail. I’ve never understood hate crime laws anyway (and I’m a lawyer). If you murder someone, it’s murder. If you assault someone, it’s assault. Subject to due process of law, you should go to jail if convicted or perhaps face capital punishment. Prosecutors have to show intent, but what does “hate” have to do with it? The perpetrator may, in fact, hate the victim but that’s not the crime. The crime is assault or murder. Those crimes have been considered crimes for millennia. Nineteen Eighty-Four Was Supposed to Be Fiction Adding hate to the definition just blurs the line between thought and action in ways that make it easier for fascist governments to target political enemies with flimsy allegations of “hate” when no actions were involved. The most egregious example of this trend toward thought crimes is Canada. The chief neo-fascist there is Prime Minister Justin Trudeau. He has proposed a law called the Online Harms Act that expands the definition of “discrimination” to include online speech “likely to foment detestation or vilification of an individual or group.” What exactly does this law mean by “foment”? Who defines “vilification” or “detestation”? What’s the definition of “group”? All of these questions will be answered by a new Digital Safety Commission, which will not be bound by “any technical or legal rules of evidence.” If accused, you can be ordered to pay $20,000 to any “victim” and $50,000 to the state with no limit on how many victims might crawl out of the woodwork. This is practically an invitation for grifters and activists to attack political enemies with fake claims of having been subject to “detestation.” It gets worse. If a court believes you are likely to commit a “hate crime” under this law, you can be placed under house arrest and held in isolation. In other words, just thinking the wrong thing as imagined by an unaccountable magistrate is enough to put you under house arrest. This is actually worse than what the Thought Police did in Orwell’s novel. You can expect censorship in the U.S. to increase as we get closer to the November election. Get ready for it. Nineteen Eighty-Four was supposed to be fiction. Unfortunately, it’s becoming reality. Regards, [Jim Rickards] Jim Rickards for The Daily Reckoning P.S. Recently, [my publisher broke the news]( that the annual subscription price of my flagship newsletter, Strategic Intelligence, may increase to $500 (or more) this year. As one of my readers, this price hike directly impacts you. This change could go into effect at any moment. But before it does, we’ve arranged a [special, limited-time offer]( for you that expires tomorrow at midnight. If you take action via [this link,]( you can lock in your current subscription price at 80% off and never have to pay the new price of $500. It’s my way of saying thank you for being one of my readers. And that’s not all… When you claim the special offer, I’ll also give you a BIG upgrade to your subscription, 100% FREE. I’m talking about adding thousands of dollars’ worth of high-level research to your subscription… for FREE! That’s why I’m asking you to visit [this page]( right away. Remember, you only have until midnight. [>> Click here now to claim this exclusive Strategic Intelligence offer… <<]( Thank you for reading The Daily Reckoning! We greatly value your questions and comments. Please send all feedback to [feedback@dailyreckoning.com.](mailto:feedback@dailyreckoning.com) [Jim Rickards] [James G. Rickards]( is the editor of Strategic Intelligence. He is an American lawyer, economist, and investment banker with 35 years of experience working in capital markets on Wall Street. He is the author of The New York Times bestsellers Currency Wars and The Death of Money. [Paradigm]( ☰ ⊗ [ARCHIVE]( [ABOUT]( [Contact Us]( © 2024 Paradigm Press, LLC. 1001 Cathedral Street, Baltimore, MD 21201. By submitting your email address, you consent to Paradigm Press, LLC. delivering daily email issues and advertisements. To end your The Daily Reckoning e-mail subscription and associated external offers sent from The Daily Reckoning, feel free to [click here.]( Please note: the mailbox associated with this email address is not monitored, so do not reply to this message. We welcome comments or suggestions at feedback@dailyreckoning.com. This address is for feedback only. For questions about your account or to speak with customer service, [contact us here]( or call (844)-731-0984. Although our employees may answer your general customer service questions, they are not licensed under securities laws to address your particular investment situation. No communication by our employees to you should be deemed as personalized financial advice. We allow the editors of our publications to recommend securities that they own themselves. However, our policy prohibits editors from exiting a personal trade while the recommendation to subscribers is open. In no circumstance may an editor sell a security before subscribers have a fair opportunity to exit. The length of time an editor must wait after subscribers have been advised to exit a play depends on the type of publication. All other employees and agents must wait 24 hours after on-line publication or 72 hours after the mailing of a printed-only publication prior to following an initial recommendation. Any investments recommended in this letter should be made only after consulting with your investment advisor and only after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company. The Daily Reckoning is committed to protecting and respecting your privacy. We do not rent or share your email address. Please read our [Privacy Statement.]( If you are having trouble receiving your The Daily Reckoning subscription, you can ensure its arrival in your mailbox by [whitelisting The Daily Reckoning.](

EDM Keywords (301)

year words woodwork window whitelisting well ways way water want voters vote visit vilification victim usaa unveiled ukraine type turns turned trump trashes today time thought though thinking think tend technical talking system supposed suggestions subscription subscribers submitting subject stop stays state started standard stakes spend specializes speak shut share senate seen seems seem see security scotland say saint russia role reviewing resulted respecting reply rent recourse recommendation recently realize reading readers rampant questions put publisher publications publication protecting protected prospectus proposed probably privacy printed prepared prefer practically popular policy policies poland played placed pay past passed pass parallel orwell ordered oppose open one offend novel nothing news never needed natwest murder much moved monitored moment minds midnight message meant means matter mar makes make mailing mailbox made lose lock live link lines line limit likely lifetimes licensed letter length least learn lawyer law keep justify jail isolation ireland involved invitation individual increase incident imprisonment imprisoned impossible imposed imagined illegal hurtful however hobbled hitler hit held hauled hate harder happens happen group grifters great granted got goes go get future free found fortune foment following focus find felony feedback fear farage far eye extension expect expands exiting exit exactly evidence equivalent ensure enough enormous enemies end enact employees election elected elect effect editors editor eastman easier dystopia doubt done discrimination differences detestation designed derogatory democrat democracy definition defeat deemed death damage cut crimes crime credit court course country convinced conviction convicted consulting consent confidants company communication committed commit collusion click clearer clear claim choice checks certainly ceo case care candidates canada came call bureaucrats brand bound boat blurs blow bigot biden beholder becomes bank author atms assault asking arrival arranged apologize anyone answered analysis already allowed allow advises advisers advised advertisements administration address activists actions action acquitted accused accounts account 80 500

Marketing emails from paradigmpressgroup.com

View More
Sent On

13/05/2024

Sent On

13/05/2024

Sent On

13/05/2024

Sent On

13/05/2024

Sent On

13/05/2024

Sent On

12/05/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2024 SimilarMail.