Newsletter Subject

Where’s Oil Going?

From

paradigm.press

Email Address

dr@email.dailyreckoning.com

Sent On

Mon, Feb 6, 2023 11:00 PM

Email Preheader Text

The Tug-of-War Rages | Where’s Oil Going? - The tug-of-war in oil prices? - The false promise

The Tug-of-War Rages [The Daily Reckoning] February 06, 2023 [WEBSITE]( | [UNSUBSCRIBE]( Where’s Oil Going? - The tug-of-war in oil prices… - The false promises of green energy… - The Davos crowd can’t repeal the law of supply and demand… [BOMBSHELL: Ex-CIA Advisor Releases New Biden Evidence]( [Click here for more...]( This crazy new Biden story is 1,000 times worse than the media will let on. If you think Biden is a life-long corrupt politician who will do anything for money and power, you’re right. And now, former advisor to CIA and Pentagon Jim Rickards has just uncovered this new Congressional evidence that will send shockwaves through Washington. [Click Here To Learn More]( En Route to Antarctica February 6, 2023 [Jim Rickards] JIM RICKARDS Dear Reader, Where are oil prices going? That’s one of the most frequently asked questions (and most difficult to answer) in markets today. A bull case can be made on the basis of persistent inflation, shortages due in part to the war in Ukraine, the Biden administration’s war on oil and natural gas and the reopening of China after the worst of the pandemic. A bear case can be made on the basis of recent disinflation, an emerging recession and demand destruction due to the Federal Reserve’s interest rate hikes and desire to reduce wages. So which case will prevail in the months ahead? The Tug-of-War in Oil Prices First, a review of price trends over the past year: Oil (as measured by the WTI front month Nymex futures contract) hit an interim high of $123.70 per barrel on March 8, 2022, shortly after the Russian invasion of Ukraine on Feb. 24. The price eased slightly to $95.04 on March 16 once it became clear that Russian oil exports wouldn't immediately be cut off by sanctions. In fact, Russian exports continue to this day subject to U.S. and EU price caps and limitations on exports by tanker. Oil hit another interim high of $122.11 per barrel on June 8. That spike coincided with the peak in U.S. inflation and the coming of the summer driving season. From there, the oil price began a relentless decline. By Dec. 9, the price of oil had fallen to $71.02 per barrel. That’s roughly a 42% collapse from the June interim high. Today, oil is about $75.00 per barrel. That’s still higher than the December low, but still down about 35% from the June high. While the price spikes in March and June were driven by fears of supply disruptions and the highest inflation in 40 years, the recent lows have been driven by the opposite forces. Fear of supply shortages has been replaced by demand destruction caused by Fed rate hikes and a slowing U.S. economy. Numerous leading indicators (especially inverted yield curves in U.S. Treasury securities and Eurodollar futures) point to a recession, which may already have started. [Attention! Before You Read Any Further…]( Before you read any further in today’s issue, an urgent situation needs your immediate attention. If you don’t plan on claiming this new upgrade to your Strategic Intelligence subscription, you’re missing out on a huge opportunity. Right now is your chance to grab one of the biggest (and most valuable) upgrades our company has ever made to a newsletter. I’m taking Strategic Intelligence to an entirely new level and I’d hate to see you left behind. [Click Here To Upgrade Now]( Inflation measured by the consumer price index year-over-year has come down from 9.1% in June 2022 to 6.5% by December. That’s still a high rate, but the decline has been persistent with inflation dropping every month from June through December. Disinflation has displaced higher inflation, and there’s every reason to expect this trend to continue. In short, supply-side disruption and inflation took the price of oil to $122.00 per barrel. Demand destruction and disinflation took it back down to $75.00 per barrel. Given that the Fed continues to raise rates, the U.S. (and global) economy continues to slow and inflation is on the run, a reasonable forecast might put oil prices at $50.00 per barrel, where they were as recently as Jan. 3, 2021. A Recipe for Higher Prices? Of course, forecasting is never so simple. Any downward projection has to ignore the recent rally. What’s behind that rally, and why might we expect oil prices to continue to rise? While demand is declining because of the coming recession, it’s the case that supply is declining even faster. Unlike early 2022 when the supply disruptions were largely logistical and geopolitical, the supply problems today are fundamental. Beginning on day one of the Biden administration, the White House took steps to destroy the U.S. hydrocarbon industry. The litany is well-known. They terminated the Keystone XL pipeline from Alberta to the United States. They banned new offshore drilling for natural gas. They halted new oil and gas exploration leases on federal land. New regulations were imposed on fracking. In the ridiculously misnamed Inflation Reduction Act signed in 2022, the administration authorized almost $1 trillion to implement the Green New Scam including subsidies on electric vehicles (EVs), subsidies on solar panels and funding for offshore windmill farms. These radical actions were accompanied by many state initiatives from California to New Jersey, banning sales of new internal-combustion engine (ICE) automobiles after the mid-2030s and mandating electric-powered school buses and urban transportation systems. Other nations from the Netherlands to Australia are taking similar extreme measures. But there is no climate emergency. Green Energy: No There There The wind and solar alternatives to oil and gas are nonfeasible in terms of maintaining baseline power to support the grid. There is not enough lithium, nickel, cobalt, graphite and copper in the world to build more than a small fraction of the batteries needed to replace ICEs with EVs. If EVs were in wide use, the vehicle charging requirements would crash the grid. Yet all of these green failures are still in the future. For some years to come, the Davos crowd (including White House officials) will persist in attacking oil and gas. As a result, executives of major oil exploration and production companies are slashing capital expenditures and new exploration. Major new oil fields require 10–15 years of development through discovery, rights acquisition, environmental permitting, regulatory permitting, political liaison, infrastructure installation, connecting energy sources to power drilling and pumping operations and much more. The oil field itself might take 10 years to recover these huge capital costs before finally producing profits over the remaining 10 years of production. What energy executive wants to commit billions of dollars of oil exploration and production costs over a 20-year horizon when politicians have vowed to eliminate the use of oil and natural gas in 10 years? The answer is none. [[CHART] Could Inflation Hit 20%+ In 2023?]( [Click here for more...]( Take a close look at this scary chart pictured here… What you see is the money supply in America… And as you can see, the number of dollars in circulation has exploded in the last few years. In fact, more than 80% of all dollars to ever exist have been printed since just 2020 alone! Which is why some say inflation could soon explode even higher than it is now, to 20% or more. And if you’re at or near retirement age you must take action now to protect yourself… otherwise you risk losing everything. See how to survive America’s deadly inflation crisis… [Click Here To Learn More]( Limited New Production Energy companies will keep existing fields in production, although they are rapidly depleting. New fields are not coming onstream because of the hydrocarbon animus of the Davos crowd. Even some existing fields are being shut down because oil majors such as Chevron, Shell, Exxon Mobil and BP have curtailed operations in Russia or sold local interests to Russian buyers. New operators lack the technical resources of the oil majors to keep production at former levels in the harsh environment of Siberia. To the extent that Russia has been able to maintain oil production, that oil is increasingly being sold to China and India, which further reduces supply to the West. The energy bottlenecks in the U.S. are not limited to oil production. Refineries are a crucial link in the energy supply chain because they convert crude oil into distilled products such as gasoline, diesel, kerosene and jet fuel. No new refineries have been built in the U.S. since 1977. Existing refineries are aging and require extensive maintenance and repair even to maintain their current inadequate level of production. In short, a temporary alleviation of some supply bottlenecks of a logistical type and a cooling of inflation pressures at a time of emerging recession have caused a moderation in oil prices. The Davos Crowd Can’t Repeal the Law of Supply & Demand Still, inflation may stabilize sooner than many expect (because of a recession). Supply chain problems will return to haunt energy markets, not because of logistics, but because of a dearth of new investment – an understandable reaction to the onslaught of anti-carbon hysteria from the White House and their European allies. The war in Ukraine will not be over soon and the likelihood of Russian victory there portends even more stringent sanctions on Russian energy. Iran is another hotspot where acts of terrorism on Israel by Iranian proxies and Israeli retaliation against Tehran may result in further restrictions on Iranian oil exports. The debate between lower or higher oil prices will be resolved in favor of the latter. Oil companies will prosper in this environment not because of new output or higher volumes, but because of much higher prices on existing levels of production. The greens can’t repeal the laws of physics, and the Davos crowd can’t repeal the law of supply and demand. Oil prices are headed higher. Regards, Jim Rickards for The Daily Reckoning [feedback@dailyreckoning.com.](mailto:feedback@dailyreckoning.com) P.S. NATO sends tanks to Ukraine… Russia prepares for a winter offensive… [Is this the beginning of World War III?]( [click here for more...]( I’ve just released an urgent message with my thoughts. But more importantly, I’m offering to send you an exact playbook on what I see playing out in the world and what you need to do to prepare. [Go here now for my brief but urgent message.]( Thank you for reading The Daily Reckoning! We greatly value your questions and comments. Please send all feedback to [feedback@dailyreckoning.com.](mailto:feedback@dailyreckoning.com) [Jim Rickards] [James G. Rickards]( is the editor of Strategic Intelligence. He is an American lawyer, economist, and investment banker with 35 years of experience working in capital markets on Wall Street. He is the author of The New York Times bestsellers Currency Wars and The Death of Money. [Paradigm]( ☰ ⊗ [ARCHIVE]( [ABOUT]( [Contact Us]( © 2023 Paradigm Press, LLC. 808 Saint Paul Street, Baltimore MD 21202. By submitting your email address, you consent to Paradigm Press, LLC. delivering daily email issues and advertisements. To end your The Daily Reckoning e-mail subscription and associated external offers sent from The Daily Reckoning, feel free to [click here.]( Please note: the mailbox associated with this email address is not monitored, so do not reply to this message. We welcome comments or suggestions at feedback@dailyreckoning.com. This address is for feedback only. For questions about your account or to speak with customer service, [contact us here]( or call (844)-731-0984. Although our employees may answer your general customer service questions, they are not licensed under securities laws to address your particular investment situation. No communication by our employees to you should be deemed as personalized financial advice. We allow the editors of our publications to recommend securities that they own themselves. However, our policy prohibits editors from exiting a personal trade while the recommendation to subscribers is open. In no circumstance may an editor sell a security before subscribers have a fair opportunity to exit. The length of time an editor must wait after subscribers have been advised to exit a play depends on the type of publication. All other employees and agents must wait 24 hours after on-line publication or 72 hours after the mailing of a printed-only publication prior to following an initial recommendation. Any investments recommended in this letter should be made only after consulting with your investment advisor and only after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company. The Daily Reckoning is committed to protecting and respecting your privacy. We do not rent or share your email address. Please read our [Privacy Statement.]( If you are having trouble receiving your The Daily Reckoning subscription, you can ensure its arrival in your mailbox by [whitelisting The Daily Reckoning.](

EDM Keywords (231)

years year worst world wind whitelisting west war vowed use upgrade uncovered ukraine type tug trend today time thoughts terrorism terms terminated take support supply suggestions subscribers submitting still speak soon sold slow simple siberia shut short share send see security sanctions russia run roughly rise right reviewing review return restrictions respecting resolved reply replaced repeal reopening rent released recover recommendation recipe recession recently reading read rally questions publications publication protecting protect prosper prospectus production privacy printed price prevail power politicians plan physics persistent persist peak part pandemic otherwise open onslaught one oil offering number nonfeasible newsletter never netherlands need nations much monitored money moderation missing might message media measured march maintain mailing mailbox made lower logistics litany limited limitations likelihood licensed letter let length learn laws law last june issue israel inflation india increasingly imposed importantly implement immediately ignore however hate grid greens geopolitical gas future funding fracking following feedback fears favor fallen fact extent exports exploded expect exiting exit evs environment ensure end employees eliminate editors editor driven dollars difficult development destroy desire demand deemed declining decline december debate death dearth cut copper cooling continue consulting consent company communication committed coming come click claiming circulation cia china chance caused case california built build brief bp biggest behind beginning basis back author australia arrival anything answer america allow alberta aging advised advertisements address acts account accompanied able 80 35 2022 20

Marketing emails from paradigm.press

View More
Sent On

15/03/2023

Sent On

15/03/2023

Sent On

15/03/2023

Sent On

14/03/2023

Sent On

14/03/2023

Sent On

14/03/2023

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.