Newsletter Subject

Fed Coin: The Empire Strikes Back

From

paradigm.press

Email Address

RudeAwakening@email.paradigm-press.net

Sent On

Thu, Dec 22, 2022 12:00 PM

Email Preheader Text

PST: Biden Bucks we’re a thing, even in 2021… | Fed Coin: The Empire Strikes Back - Cash i

PST: Biden Bucks we’re a thing, even in 2021… [The Rude Awakening] December 22, 2022 [WEBSITE]( | [UNSUBSCRIBE]( Fed Coin: The Empire Strikes Back - Cash is a pain in the ass. - But it’s under your complete control at all times. - Central bank-issued digital currencies are not, and worst-case scenarios cannot be dismissed as alarmist nonsense. [“Under Joe Biden, Americans Could Suffer Economic Super Collapse”]( ~ Ex-Advisor to the Pentagon and CIA [(Please view this warning now)]( [Click Here To Learn More]( [Sean Ring] SEAN RING Happy Thursday! This is a re-run of a piece I wrote back in October 2021. It’s on the theme of Biden Bucks, so hopefully, it’s at the top of your mind. I know I was supposed to write only good news for the rest of the week, but my goodness, it’s hard work! Central Bank Digital Currencies: What’s in Your Wallet? Old friend and Rude reader Trav sent me an interesting email yesterday that I almost dismissed offhandedly. When you've been a right-libertarian for many years, you’re naturally ahead of the curve as libertarians are a vigilant, fearful, pessimistic bunch. Many arguments, caveats, and banana peels they saw coming decades ago are now just entering the mainstream. Travis sent me this [Doomberg]( article, which talks about the impending USD digitalization. Doomberg earlier said Powell was done at the Fed, a hypothesis George Gammon agrees with. Powell’s would-be departure is due in no small part to Fed apparatchiks wanting to introduce a digital currency, an idea to which Powell is lukewarm. Libertarians for ages have hated all sorts of elimination of cash or central bank digital currencies, because governments could just turn off wallets. This is not a far-fetched scenario, as only four months ago, the Bank of England asked ministers to intervene in [digital currency programming](. The digital currency can then be programmed to be spent only on essentials or items the government or employer (GASP!) thinks are “sensible.” This is an affront to anyone who knows civilization was built on the foundation of private property rights. What’s Yours is Mine Think about these things: If the government knows that you got caught driving while intoxicated once, are you ever going to be able to buy alcohol again with your central bank-issued digital currency? If you ever abused prescription drugs before, will you be able to buy them later on, even if you're completely over it, with your central bank digital currency? Are you ever going to be able to purchase marijuana? Are you ever going to be able to do anything that you want with your own money? This is an assault on private property. A government would be able to turn off your medium of exchange, thereby prohibiting you from buying what you want. Your wealth is the sum of your lifetime’s income minus all the costs. Your money is all about how you wield your wealth. I have been privy to these arguments forever. [Sad Because You Missed Out On The Crypto Boom? Your Timing Might Be PERFECT]( Because of the crash, super-valuable cryptocurrencies are trading for pennies on the dollar. Now is your chance to scoop them up… sit back… and let your fortune build. As I’m sure you can imagine, you need a different strategy to make money with cryptocurrencies today… [… and that’s exactly what you’ll find here.]( [Click Here To Learn More]( One Ring to Rule Them All Thorsten Polleit, an excellent German economist of the Austrian School, has called the impending central bank digital currencies, ["The one ring to rule them all."]( From Polleit’s speech at the Property and Freedom Conference this year: However, the One Ring of power stands for the particularly evil idea of creating a state of states, a world government, a world state; and the creation of a single world fiat currency controlled by the states would pave the way toward this outcome. Knowing the globalizers inside the UN, the IMF, the World Bank, Washington, London, (Despite Brexit!), and the European Union, you could see that as an endpoint. What if one government sticks a prohibition on you? Will you, say, book a plane flight? Will you be able to put your digital currency in whatever bank in the world? And if you stick it in the bank, will your home government monitor your transactions from afar? We can see that the IRS wants to monitor all bank transactions over $600. We've also just seen [via Bloomberg]( that China has ordered HSBC, Manulife, and AIA to prohibit withdrawals for Hong Kongers leaving the territory to resettle in England. On the surface, that’s because they have British national overseas passports, and the Chinese government doesn't recognize them. But the real reason is they don’t want billions of dollars withdrawn in Hong Kong and deposited in London. This was another thing libertarians were way out ahead on the curve. Because what happens when Social Security genuinely runs out of money and can't print anymore? They're going to start seizing retirement accounts, which is why I smartly put mine offshore years ago. If you can do that, please do so. You never, ever know when that day is going to come, and in the great words of Andrew Henderson of Nomad Capitalist, "You'd rather be three years early than one day late." What About Cryptocurrencies? This only bolsters the argument for cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin and Ether, which are beyond government control. Again, the arguments that Bitcoiners put forward 12 years ago no longer seem fanciful, even to the mainstream. That’s because government actions speak for themselves. This is just yet another reason at least part of your portfolio should be in cryptocurrencies, because when the rush to buy cryptos genuinely happens, crypto will roof it. We’re still in the early adopter stage, so you have some time. Bitcoin and Ethereum lead the way now, although who knows what'll happen with these newer digital currencies coming up? Friedrich Hayek was a proponent of the denationalization of money and putting money in the hands of where it should be, which is the market. Money is subject to the laws of supply and demand, just like everything else, and should be out of government hands. Of course, everyone alive today has not lived through a regime where the government did not control money, so that's an entirely foreign concept. Unfortunately, far from denationalizing money, we are going in the opposite direction, where governments can control every purchase we make. If you value your freedom, you must avoid this scenario at all costs. So prepare yourself, start looking at crypto, start getting your pension offshore, if it isn't offshore already, and beware of what your government is doing in digitalizing its currency. Sorry for the grave tidings, but the “utopian” future governments promise us seem quite dystopian. Have a great day. All the best, [Sean Ring] Sean Ring Editor, Rude Awakening [Paradigm]( ☰ ⊗ [ARCHIVE]( [ABOUT]( [Contact Us]( © 2022 Paradigm Press, LLC. 808 Saint Paul Street, Baltimore MD 21202. By submitting your email address, you consent to Paradigm Press, LLC. delivering daily email issues and advertisements. To end your Rude Awakening e-mail subscription and associated external offers sent from Rude Awakening, feel free to [click here.]( Please note: the mailbox associated with this email address is not monitored, so do not reply to this message. We welcome comments or suggestions at feedback@rudeawakening.info. This address is for feedback only. For questions about your account or to speak with customer service, [contact us here]( or call (844)-731-0984. Although our employees may answer your general customer service questions, they are not licensed under securities laws to address your particular investment situation. No communication by our employees to you should be deemed as personalized financial advice. We allow the editors of our publications to recommend securities that they own themselves. However, our policy prohibits editors from exiting a personal trade while the recommendation to subscribers is open. In no circumstance may an editor sell a security before subscribers have a fair opportunity to exit. The length of time an editor must wait after subscribers have been advised to exit a play depends on the type of publication. All other employees and agents must wait 24 hours after on-line publication or 72 hours after the mailing of a printed-only publication prior to following an initial recommendation. Any investments recommended in this letter should be made only after consulting with your investment advisor and only after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company. Rude Awakening is committed to protecting and respecting your privacy. We do not rent or share your email address. Please read our [Privacy Statement.]( If you are having trouble receiving your Rude Awakening subscription, you can ensure its arrival in your mailbox by [whitelisting Rude Awakening.](

EDM Keywords (200)

write would world wield week wealth way warning want wallets value un type turn transactions trading top time things theme territory talks surface sure supposed supply sum suggestions subscribers submitting subject still stick states state spent speech speak sorts share sensible see security scoop scenario rush run rule roof reviewing rest respecting resettle reply rent regime recommendation recognize rather questions put publications publication protecting prospectus proponent property prohibition programmed privy privacy printed prepare powell portfolio polleit please piece perfect pentagon pennies pain open need monitored monitor money missed mind message medium make mainstream mailing mailbox made london lived lifetime licensed libertarians letter let length learn laws later knows know items introduce intoxicated intervene imf imagine idea however hopefully hated happens happen hands governments government goodness going freedom foundation following find feedback fed exiting exit exactly even ether essentials entering ensure england endpoint end employees elimination editors due done dollar dismissed digitalizing deposited departure denationalization demand deemed day curve cryptocurrencies creation creating costs consulting consent completely communication committed come click china chance cash called buying buy built bolsters beware bank assault ass arrival arguments argument anything anyone although also allow aia ahead ages affront afar advised advertisements address account able 600 2021

Marketing emails from paradigm.press

View More
Sent On

15/03/2023

Sent On

15/03/2023

Sent On

15/03/2023

Sent On

14/03/2023

Sent On

14/03/2023

Sent On

14/03/2023

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2024 SimilarMail.