Newsletter Subject

An Inconvenient Truth

From

paradigm.press

Email Address

dr@email.dailyreckoning.com

Sent On

Wed, Nov 30, 2022 10:30 PM

Email Preheader Text

For the Climate Alarmists, That Is | An Inconvenient Truth - An inconvenient truth for climate alarm

For the Climate Alarmists, That Is [The Daily Reckoning] November 30, 2022 [WEBSITE]( | [UNSUBSCRIBE]( An Inconvenient Truth - An inconvenient truth for climate alarmists… - Is carbon dioxide really capable of roasting the planet?… - Junk climate models… [Secret Gold Back currency RUINING Biden’s plans for a digital dollar?]( [Click here for more...]( What I’m holding in my hand is a completely new form of money… As we speak, it's being used as an alternative currency across the U.S. minting in places like Utah, New Hampshire and Nevada… And since it’s made out of a thinly printed sheet of REAL gold... It may be the single best way to protect your wealth from Biden’s plan for a government controlled digital dollar. That’s why, I want to offer to send one to you today. But since I have a limited number I need you to respond to this message by Wednesday at midnight. I’ve recorded a short 2 minute message that explains everything here. [Click Here To Watch Now]( Annapolis, Maryland November 30, 2022 [Brian Maher] BRIAN MAHER Dear Reader , ‘Tis is a shame that the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change doesn’t follow the science more closely… At its recent climate confabulation it announced a: Breakthrough agreement to provide “loss and damage” funding for vulnerable countries hit hard by climate disasters. That is, a breakthrough agreement to fleece the United States taxpayer. It is he — and she — whose pocket the United Nations would pick. That is because the United Nations fingers the United States for such disasters, uniquely. Yet if the United States must shoulder the blame for the world’s “climate disasters,” should it not accept credit for climactic improvements? Satellite data reveals that Arctic Ocean ice has increased mightily since 2018: [IMAGE 1] More CO2, More Ice Yet let the record indicate: Carbon dioxide emissions increased measurably through 2018. For example: Our scientific brethren inform us that total global emissions equaled 35.5 billion metric tons in 2015. Total global emissions equaled 36.65 billion tons in 2018. Our scientific brethren further inform us that atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations equaled 401 parts per million in 2015. In 2018? Nearly 409 parts per million. Yet Arctic ice went trampolining in 2018 — despite carbon dioxide’s relentless assaults. How can this be? We ordered our men to ransack the available scientific literature. What did they discover? Here is the short answer: Nobody knows. Here is the long answer — and please pardon the abstruse scientific terminology: Nobody knows. No More Ice! The Sky Is Falling! “Amateur scientist” Willis Eschenbach: Since around 1990, people have been talking about how human-emitted CO2 is busily reducing the amount of Arctic sea ice. When it started dropping very fast around 2015, there was talk that we’d passed a “tipping point” from which the Arctic ice would never recover. And over this entire time, predictions of an “ice-free Arctic Ocean” abounded. But then… around 2018, the Arctic sea ice rebounded. Why did it suddenly start dropping so fast post-2015? Nobody knows. Not one scientist on the planet can tell you. Why the quick turnaround and rebound starting in 2018? Nobody knows. Not one scientist on the planet can tell you. By his own admission, this fellow is not a credentialed authority within the environmental sciences. Yet our men’s ransackings of the scientific literature yielded identical conclusions: Nobody knows. [URGENT From Jim Rickards: Join Me LIVE On Friday Morning?]( Hey, it’s Jim Rickards… and whatever you have planned for this upcoming Friday at 10 AM Eastern, I suggest you cancel. Because I’ll be hosting a LIVE Zoom call where I’m going to break down my latest predictions for 2023. [Click Here To Reserve Your Seat]( Maybe the Little Ones Are Responsible Explanations include shifting wind currents and meteorological phenomena such as “El Nino” and “La Nina.” The English-translated “little boy” and “little girl” wield substantial influence over sea temperatures… so we are told. There is also the sun to consider — we are told it gives off a varying glow. Meantime, we learn that over half of today’s Arctic glaciers and ice caps failed to exist 3,400–10,000 years ago — or were smaller in size. Yet carbon dioxide concentrations were far less than today’s 410 parts per million. We are informed they hovered between 260–270 parts per million. Yet today’s Arctic ice holds a deeper grip than it did thousands of years past… when carbon dioxide concentrations were nothing against today’s (a nice point to put somewhere). Your editor concedes he commands a rudimentary knowledge of the environmental sciences. Yet he is greater swayed by the natural theory than the carbon dioxide theory. Carbon Dioxide’s Limited Footprint Our minions have investigated the literature on carbon dioxide. From them we learn: Carbon dioxide represents a vanishing 0.04% part of Earth’s atmosphere. Imagine — if you will — this atmosphere as 100 cases of one-liter bottles. That is, imagine this atmosphere as 2,400 one-liter bottles. Of those 100 cases, 99 are not greenhouse gasses whatsoever. They are therefore irrelevant to our inquiry. A mere one case of the 100 represents greenhouse gasses. Of the one case that represents greenhouse gasses, merely one bottle of the 24 represents carbon dioxide. One Shot Glass! Of the one bottle that represents this demon molecule, perhaps 50 milliliters represent mankind’s annual contribution — roughly one shot glass. And so… of our theoretical atmosphere of 2,400 liters, humans contribute perhaps one shot glass of carbon dioxide per year. Alternately: Analogize the atmosphere to a 100-story building. The human CO2 concentration rises to the linoleum on the ground floor — no higher. Yet the United Nations informs us that this relative trifle is scorching the planet. We request authenticated documentation — chapter, verse, line, letter. Please include the footnotes. [QUICK! Count how many pennies you see]( [Click here for more...]( Here’s why: If you missed out on making a fortune with cryptocurrencies, the recent crash has finally given you your chance to scoop up cryptos for pennies on the dollar. Literally. Because there’s a cryptocurrency quietly preparing to conquer the marketplace… and it’s trading for 96% below its all-time high. In fact… … it’s trading for the number of pennies you counted above. Get your hands on this bargain crypto while you can. Find out how to make up to an 8,788% return with crypto by 2025. [Click Here Now]( We’re Still Waiting As we have conceded in the past: It is fully plausible that fuel burning has tinkered Earth’s temperature. But a tinker is not a manipulation. And again we concede the science is… complex. Moreover, that it is beyond our slender comprehension. Yet if Earth’s climate was so exquisitely sensitive to minor carbon dioxide rises… why didn’t it erupt long ago? Our men inform us this planet has previously endured CO2 levels 25 times or greater than today’s. Yet the match never struck. The catastrophists warn us nonetheless that we will roast if emissions continue — and that they have models in proof of it. Garbage In, Garbage Out Yet do these models give true readings? They do not. From a 2020 report by the American Geophysical Union: The tendency of climate models to overstate warming in the tropical troposphere has long been noted… We focus on the 1979–2014 interval, the maximum span for which all observational products are available…. all 38 models overpredict warming in every target observational analog, in most cases significantly so, and the average differences between models and observations are statistically significant. All 38 models! Can you believe it? Further razzing comes by way of geophysicist Mr. Allan MacRae: By the end of 2020, the climate doomsters were proved wrong in their scary climate predictions 48 times. At 50-50 odds for each prediction, that is like flipping a coin 48 times and losing every time! The probability of that being mere random stupidity is one in 281 trillion!… The global warming alarmists have a perfect NEGATIVE predictive track record — they have been 100% wrong about every scary climate prediction — so nobody should continue to believe them. When the UN Will Admit It Might Be Wrong Even the catastrophists themselves are beginning to cough behind their hands, disappointedly. They concede they were yelling wolf. Science magazine: The climate models that help them project the future have grown a little too alarmist. Many of the world’s leading models are now projecting warming rates that most scientists, including the modelmakers themselves, believe are implausibly fast. The United Nations nonetheless fingers the United States for the “climate disasters” that besiege the world. Yet if the United States wields such vast influence over the world’s climate… Should the UN not then credit the United States for the expanding Arctic ice? Here is precisely when you can expect it: When the United States taxpayer is fully fleeced… or when hell freezes over… Whichever comes first. Regards, [Brian Maher] Brian Maher Managing Editor, The Daily Reckoning [feedback@dailyreckoning.com.](mailto:feedback@dailyreckoning.com) Editor’s note: In Jim Rickards’ 2011 book Currency Wars, he warned that the U.S. was engaged in a special type of economic war. Jim said that these wars would: Degenerate into sequential bouts of inflation, recession, retaliation and actual violence as the scramble for resources leads to invasion and war. The historical precedents are sobering… Some version of the worst-case scenario is almost inevitable. Now with Putin invading Ukraine, rising tensions with China, inflation, recession, supply chain issues and the potential for greater violence breaking out all over the world… It seems Jim’s worst fears are coming true. [That’s why he recorded this short video message.]( Jim wants to help you prepare for what he fears is coming next. Because if history is any indicator, there could be real trouble ahead. [Click here to view Jim’s urgent video message.]( Thank you for reading The Daily Reckoning! We greatly value your questions and comments. Please send all feedback to [feedback@dailyreckoning.com.](mailto:feedback@dailyreckoning.com) [Brian Maher] [Brian Maher]( is the Daily Reckoning's Managing Editor. Before signing on to Agora Financial, he was an independent researcher and writer who covered economics, politics and international affairs. His work has appeared in the Asia Times and other news outlets around the world. He holds a Master's degree in Defense & Strategic Studies. [Paradigm]( ☰ ⊗ [ARCHIVE]( [ABOUT]( [Contact Us]( © 2022 Paradigm Press, LLC. 808 Saint Paul Street, Baltimore MD 21202. By submitting your email address, you consent to Paradigm Press, LLC. delivering daily email issues and advertisements. To end your The Daily Reckoning e-mail subscription and associated external offers sent from The Daily Reckoning, feel free to [click here.]( Please note: the mailbox associated with this email address is not monitored, so do not reply to this message. We welcome comments or suggestions at feedback@dailyreckoning.com. This address is for feedback only. For questions about your account or to speak with customer service, [contact us here]( or call (844)-731-0984. Although our employees may answer your general customer service questions, they are not licensed under securities laws to address your particular investment situation. No communication by our employees to you should be deemed as personalized financial advice. We allow the editors of our publications to recommend securities that they own themselves. However, our policy prohibits editors from exiting a personal trade while the recommendation to subscribers is open. In no circumstance may an editor sell a security before subscribers have a fair opportunity to exit. The length of time an editor must wait after subscribers have been advised to exit a play depends on the type of publication. All other employees and agents must wait 24 hours after on-line publication or 72 hours after the mailing of a printed-only publication prior to following an initial recommendation. Any investments recommended in this letter should be made only after consulting with your investment advisor and only after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company. The Daily Reckoning is committed to protecting and respecting your privacy. We do not rent or share your email address. Please read our [Privacy Statement.]( If you are having trouble receiving your The Daily Reckoning subscription, you can ensure its arrival in your mailbox by [whitelisting The Daily Reckoning.](

EDM Keywords (220)

yet writer world work whitelisting whatever wednesday wealth way watch warned war want version used un type trading told today tinker time thousands tendency temperature tell talking talk sun suggestions suggest subscribers submitting speak sobering smaller sky since signing share shame security scramble scorching scoop science roasting roast reviewing respond respecting reserve represents reply rent recorded recommendation reading ransackings ransack questions publications publication protecting protect prospectus proof project probability privacy printed prepare prediction precisely potential plans planned planet plan pennies past passed ordered open one offer observations number nothing noted note nobody nevada need monitored money models modelmakers missed minting minions might midnight message men may master marketplace manipulation making make mailing mailbox made long live little literature linoleum licensed letter length learn investigated invasion inquiry informed indicator imagine ice however hovered hosting holds holding history help hands hand half grown greater going gives get garbage future fortune following follow focus fleece find fellow feedback fears fact expect exiting exit example ensure engaged end employees editors eastern earth discover degree deemed cryptos cryptocurrencies crypto credit counted could continue consulting consider consent conquer conceded concede company communication committed commands co2 closely climate click chance catastrophists cancel break blame biden beyond besiege believe beginning available atmosphere arrival appeared announced amount also allow advised advertisements admit admission address account 96 2020 2018 2015 10

Marketing emails from paradigm.press

View More
Sent On

15/03/2023

Sent On

15/03/2023

Sent On

15/03/2023

Sent On

14/03/2023

Sent On

14/03/2023

Sent On

14/03/2023

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.