Newsletter Subject

There Once Was a Boy From Watford

From

paradigm.press

Email Address

RudeAwakening@email.paradigm-press.net

Sent On

Fri, Nov 25, 2022 12:40 PM

Email Preheader Text

Following on from yesterday’s Thanksgiving piece, I thought I’d tell you a horror story. |

Following on from yesterday’s Thanksgiving piece, I thought I’d tell you a horror story. [The Rude Awakening] November 25, 2022 [WEBSITE]( | [UNSUBSCRIBE]( There Once Was a Boy From Watford - Following on from yesterday’s Thanksgiving piece, I thought I’d tell you a horror story. - This happens when what you don’t understand collides with what you didn’t expect. - I’ll tell the story without any advanced mathematics or “Greeks.” [Biden Exec Order Means Permanent Dem Control?]( On March 9, President Biden quietly signed Executive Order 14067. This Order could pave the way for Democrats holding onto power in 2024. In fact, they could control America indefinitely. A former advisor to the CIA and Pentagon believes this order could allow for legal government surveillance of all US citizens; total control over your bank accounts and purchases; and the ability to silence all dissenting voices for good. To protect your freedom and your wealth, [see his dark warning now](. [Click Here To Learn More]( [Sean Ring] SEAN RING Dear Reader, Happy Tuesday to you! I received overwhelmingly positive feedback from yesterday’s Rude on Taleb and shorting options. Thank you! But I thought I’d elaborate on what can happen - though admittedly very rarely does - when you’re short volatility and you don’t know what you’re doing. The Rogue Trader Nick Leeson was an ordinary boy from the ordinary London suburb of Watford. He was going to live an ordinary life until he got the opportunity to work in The City. That’s The City of London, where serious international banking gets done. It’s the British bastion of capitalism, whose profits pay for the folly of the British Welfare State. But Nick didn’t have the right background, nor the right accent, to succeed there. So when he was given the opportunity to move to Singapore, he jumped at the chance. As a side note, when mediocre bankers are sent from London to Hong Kong, they’re pejoratively called FILTH - Failed In London, Try Hong Kong. Hint, hint… Nick got on a plane and went to Singapore, where he was named as a floor trader and Head of Settlements. In the early 90s, that nonsense could happen. Let me confirm it means he was responsible for checking his own trades. And yes, you’re right; it was a recipe for disaster. Without overegging the pudding, let me get straight to the trades that brought down Barings Bank, HM The Queen’s Bank, in 1995. Much of this is by memory, as my edition of Rogue Trader, Leeson’s autobiography, was lost in one of my many moves. Thus, any errors are my own. Straddle This! I’m going to proceed in a plain English manner, not making it too geeky or Greeky. If you’re a pro, please forgive me for the oversimplification. [SJN] This is the payoff profile of a long call position at expiry. It’s a bullish trade. In this case, the call buyer pays $5 per share for the right to buy 100 shares later at $225. Therefore, the breakeven point is $5 + $225 = $230. The buyer can only lose his premium, no more. That’s still 100%, to be sure, but it’s not as much as he may lose holding the shares. The upside is unlimited. Think TSLA call buyers and how much they made! Next, is a long put option. [SJN] A long put option is where the buyer has the right to sell shares at a specific price in the future. In this case, the buyer paid $6 for the right to sell these shares for $225. This a bearish trade, as the buyer must think the price will decrease. The breakeven point is $225 - $6 = $219. That is also the maximum gain, as it’s not unlimited (though it’ll feel almost as good)! So a long call and a long put, separately, are directional trades. But what happens when we put them together? Remember, these calls and puts will have the same underlying, strike price, and expiry. [SJN] Et voila! You’ve got a volatility trade! That is, you’re long volatility. (I always write the “olatility” next to the payoff profile to make it easier for grads to remember.) Just looking at that payoff profile, you see something obvious: it doesn’t matter which direction the underlying goes, as long as it goes pretty far. So you’ve got unlimited gain potential from the call. You’ve got the limited but still substantial potential gain from the put. Now, there are two breakeven points. This will be the strike price plus and minus the combined premiums., The upside breakeven point is $225 + $11 = $236. The downside breakeven point is $225 - $11 = $214. As long as the underlying either goes up beyond $236 or down below $214, you will make money. Of course, the pros will manage these trades minute to minute and make adjustments accordingly. However, this is something retail investors, who have other jobs, will find very difficult to do. But for now, know that a long straddle is a long volatility trade. [A $557 credit has been applied to your account.]( [Please click here to learn how to claim it.]( Customer Service, Paradigm Press [Click Here To Learn More]( Derivatives Are a Zero-Sum Game Derivatives are a zero-sum game. That means no wealth is created or destroyed by trading them. Of course, there are winners, and there are losers. It’s capitalism at its very finest. But overall, nothing is lost. That means if you can buy a straddle, then someone must have sold it to you. Someone like, say, Nick Leeson. To illustrate, let’s take the long straddle we just looked at, and flip it upside down. [SJN] It’s the exact same trade but from the seller’s perspective. Let me ask you this: what’s the best thing that can happen to the seller? Answer: nothing. Literally. If the straddle expires at $225, the seller will keep the $11 per share premium. Anywhere else, he doesn’t maximize his gain. Below $214 and above $236, he loses money. Again, if a pro entered this trade, he’d keep his eye on it and manage it accordingly. He can use stop-loss orders, or close out a side, or turn the straddle into an iron butterfly. Don’t worry about these things right now. Because if your name is in God’s book on a particular day, he’s going to get you no matter what. And that happened to Nick Leeson. How Straddles Killed Nick Leeson and Barings Bank Leeson was already down. He was supposed to be running an arbitrage operation, that is, taking on no risk. But he couldn’t help himself. Leeson already racked up millions in losses. Moreover, he was losing nearly from his first day in the office in 1992. It just turned 1995, and he was running out of options - no pun intended. So how could he get that money back with little risk? Boom! He could sell straddles! That would let him take in the premium from both the calls and puts. The markets are quiet anyway, so it’s a sure thing. The date was January 16, 1995. Leeson sold a bunch of straddles on the Nikkei Index. He probably went down to Harry’s Bar on Boat Quay after work, thinking all was well. Incidentally, Harry’s is right next to my favorite SG watering hole, the Penny Black. Harry’s used to have a plaque on the bar that read, “Here sat Nick Leeson.” I saw it, myself! Then, in the early hours of January 17, 1995, the unthinkable happened. The Kobe Earthquake struck. [SJN] Leeson, already down GBP 208m, was crushed. The Nikkei gapped down on the open. Of course, the call options would expire worthless, but he was now short deeply in the money puts. To counteract this, Leeson bought futures as the market “couldn’t go down anymore.” But, of course, it did. Nick Leeson’s losses totaled GBP 827 million, about $1.4 billion. I know that doesn’t sound like much now, but it was enough to wipe Barings, The Queen’s Bank, from the map. A friend of mine once told me of an event he held in Singapore. A member of the Royal Family was present to open the event. My friend pointed out the window onto Raffles Place and said, “That’s where Barings office used to be.” Allegedly, the reply was, “My family lost a lot of money that day.” That is the story of Nick Leeson, told as plainly and as “Greeklessly” as I can. It’s a great cautionary tale to both retail options traders and professionals alike. Heck, it can be said that Leeson inadvertently wrote today’s derivatives regulatory structure. But if yesterday’s article didn’t convince you, there are far better, less risky, and less stressful ways to participate in the market than by shorting options. Have a great day today! All the best, [Sean Ring] Sean Ring Editor, Rude Awakening [Paradigm]( ☰ ⊗ [ARCHIVE]( [ABOUT]( [Contact Us]( © 2022 Paradigm Press, LLC. 808 Saint Paul Street, Baltimore MD 21202. By submitting your email address, you consent to Paradigm Press, LLC. delivering daily email issues and advertisements. To end your Rude Awakening e-mail subscription and associated external offers sent from Rude Awakening, feel free to [click here.]( Please note: the mailbox associated with this email address is not monitored, so do not reply to this message. We welcome comments or suggestions at feedback@rudeawakening.info. This address is for feedback only. For questions about your account or to speak with customer service, [contact us here]( or call (844)-731-0984. Although our employees may answer your general customer service questions, they are not licensed under securities laws to address your particular investment situation. No communication by our employees to you should be deemed as personalized financial advice. We allow the editors of our publications to recommend securities that they own themselves. However, our policy prohibits editors from exiting a personal trade while the recommendation to subscribers is open. In no circumstance may an editor sell a security before subscribers have a fair opportunity to exit. The length of time an editor must wait after subscribers have been advised to exit a play depends on the type of publication. All other employees and agents must wait 24 hours after on-line publication or 72 hours after the mailing of a printed-only publication prior to following an initial recommendation. Any investments recommended in this letter should be made only after consulting with your investment advisor and only after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company. Rude Awakening is committed to protecting and respecting your privacy. We do not rent or share your email address. Please read our [Privacy Statement.]( If you are having trouble receiving your Rude Awakening subscription, you can ensure its arrival in your mailbox by [whitelisting Rude Awakening.](

EDM Keywords (235)

yesterday yes worry work winners went wealth way watford used upside type turn trading trades trade told time thought tell taleb taking take sure supposed suggestions succeed subscribers submitting straddles straddle story speak sold sjn singapore silence side shares share settlements sent seller sell security saw said running rude risk right reviewing responsible respecting reply rent remember recommendation recipe read rarely questions queen puts put purchases publications publication protecting protect prospectus pros proceed privacy printed price present premium plaque plane plainly participate options opportunity open one office nick named name much move monitored money minute minus mine millions message memory member means maximize matter markets market map manage making make mailing mailbox made lot lost losers lose looking looked long london live limited licensed letter length learn know keep jumped jobs however help held head harry happens happened happen greeky greeklessly grads got good going god go given get geeky gain future friend freedom folly following flip finest find feedback fact eye expiry expect exiting exit exact event errors ensure enough end employees elaborate editors edition easier direction difficult destroyed derivatives deemed decrease day date crushed created course counteract could convince consulting consent confirm communication committed close click claim city cia checking chance case capitalism calls call buyer buy bunch brought boy book bar bank autobiography ask article arrival applied anymore also already allow allegedly advised advertisements address account accordingly ability 236 225 214 2024 1992

Marketing emails from paradigm.press

View More
Sent On

15/03/2023

Sent On

15/03/2023

Sent On

15/03/2023

Sent On

14/03/2023

Sent On

14/03/2023

Sent On

14/03/2023

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.