Newsletter Subject

FTX vs. DeFi

From

paradigm.press

Email Address

AltucherConfidential@email.threefounderspublishing.com

Sent On

Mon, Nov 14, 2022 10:41 PM

Email Preheader Text

Make DeFi Great Again… | Centralized finance is perpetually one bank run away from a new stone

Make DeFi Great Again… [Altucher Confidential] November 14, 2022 [WEBSITE]( | [UNSUBSCRIBE]( Centralized finance is perpetually one bank run away from a new stone age. DeFi was conceived to solve this inherent fragility. [Hero_Image] FTX vs. DeFi By Chris Campbell ***URGENT ACCESS LINK*** [Click here for more...]( WHO: Jim Rickards, Former Advisor To The CIA and the White House WHAT: Urgent Update that has NOTHING to do with the midterm election, a stock market crash, or the Federal Reserve’s next move. WHERE: 1 Block From The White House. WHEN: LIVE NOW!!! Take advantage of your urgent access link, ASAP: [ CLICK HERE NOW ]( [Chris Campbell] CHRIS CAMPBELL If you’ve been off the grid for the past week… You’ve probably got a few questions about what’s going on in cryptoland. Here’s the recap… → FTX is dead. → The exchange had some $900m of assets and $9b+ of liabilities. → SBF, the founder, was using a “backdoor” to grab billions in customer deposits. → The executives knew they were rats on a sinking ship. . → Several funds had hundreds of millions on FTX. Tally it up. Three of the worst events in crypto history have happened this year. The losses surrounding FTX, Celsius, Blockfi, Voyager, 3AC, etc. have been enormous. Though many are framing this as the beginning of mass crypto contagion… I think it’s more likely that FTX’s collapse is the tail-end of the Luna contagion. FTX’s problems appear to have begun when Luna collapsed. They’ve been papering up the holes ever since. And, while regulators might point fingers at DeFi for the failure of these protocols… What they won’t tell you is that FTX is just a microcosm of Big Finance. Today, all of CeFi is perpetually one bank run away from a new stone age. DeFi was conceived to solve this inherent fragility. To understand how, it’s important to understand the glue that holds the economy together: trust. Why Regulations? Trust is the most important layer of every economy. No trust = no economy. The intention of regulation is to improve trust in the systems. Unfortunately, it’s difficult to improve trust through regulations alone without it also turning into a scheme to harden incumbents over time. (And then those incumbents, resting on their laurels, overextend themselves, destroying the trust. The greatest paradox of history so far might be that, on a long enough timeline, everything becomes what it hates.) Recall, Bitcoin was launched as a response to the systemic failures of 2008. It was a rage against the machine for and by people who’d lost trust in the system. (Same for the Gamestop saga.) Though there’s a philosophical battle between “Bitcoin maximalists” and “crypto,” both sides operate under the same basic principles. They agree more than they disagree. But human nature being what it is… both parties succumb to the [narcissism of small differences.]( To me, Bitcoin falls under the “DeFi” rubric. DeFi protocols, just like Bitcoin, removes the need to “improve trust” on a superficial level. Trust beyond family and friends is flimsy. It’s just an image. And, in the age of the “deepfake,” looks are increasingly deceiving. That’s why Bitcoin’s battle cry has always been: “Don’t trust, verify.” As compared to centralized finance… 1.] DeFi is auditable in real-time from anywhere in the world. 2.] DeFi protocols are credibly neutral. By design, they don’t favor specific people or outcomes over others. 3.] DeFi protocols don’t hold customer funds, nor do they have ANY access to them under any circumstances (even under the threat of force). That last one is important because it’s how centralized financial flophouses find themselves in trouble. It’s important to recognize that a non-custodial (self-custody) exchange system in the traditional fiat world simply can’t exist. This is something unique to crypto that can’t be replicated in CeFi. Meaning, you’re always going to have to trust some guy in a suit telling you “Everything is fine.” Taken together, these three things above represent a massive improvement over centralized intermediaries. The FTX saga is just one of the latest — and, sure, one of the greatest — examples. Attention! Before You Read Any Further… [Click here for more...]( Hey, it’s James. Before you read any further in today’s issue, an urgent situation needs your immediate attention. If you don’t plan on claiming this upgrade to your Altucher’s Investment Network subscription, you’re missing out on a huge opportunity. Right now is your chance to grab one of the biggest (and most valuable) upgrades our company has ever made to a newsletter. I’m taking Altucher’s Investment Network to an entirely new level and I’d hate to see you left behind. [To see how to claim your upgrade, just click here now.]( FTX vs. DeFi That Sam Bankman-Fried began coming out against DeFi in recent months, in hindsight, was indicative of just how spoiled the milk really was. SBF [couldn’t explain why]( But he was afraid of the transparency, openness, and the self-custodial principles of decentralized exchanges. Well, now we know why: Because he wouldn’t have gotten away with 1% of what he was doing behind everyone’s backs. Amanda Cassatt of Coindesk put it best: “The FTX collapse was a failure of CeFi, not DeFi – and smart investors, builders and users are already taking notice. I believe that many have learned their lesson this time. To them: Welcome, once again, to the decentralized future.” Silver Linings Though it might take crypto some time to recover from this fiasco… There are some silver linings. To build customer confidence, centralized exchanges will likely implement proof-of-reserves (POR). It’s not going to be perfect, but it’s a step in the right direction. Right now, centralized exchanges are black boxes. We have no idea what’s going on. And that’s part of the problem. Proof-of-reserves will use blockchain data to prove a centralized exchange’s assets and liabilities. This is easy to do without giving up anyone’s personal information and precisely zero exchanges have any reasonable excuses not to be transparent in this way. The more transparent an exchange is, the more it will earn trust. Exchanges that refuse to embrace transparency will lose trust. Another silver lining: more people will embrace self-custody. Centralized exchanges carry unnecessary risk when you can hold your assets in your custody. Having the choice is a game-changer. Still Here to Stay In short… If you’ve been in crypto long enough, you’ve survived flash crashes, exploits, explosions, implosions, hackers, phishers, worms, bugs, bank runs, and the like. Crypto is one of the most incredible industries for accelerated evolution and experimentation. But it also means that failures and explosions will happen. And more quickly, too. By pushing risk to the edges, DeFi aims to solve many of the systemic risks of traditional finance, which is perpetually one bank run away from collapse. And though there’s no shortage of talking heads dancing on its grave today… Crypto’s still here to stay. Until tomorrow, [Chris Campbell] Chris Campbell For Altucher Confidential Military Experts preparing for a “Pearl Harbor Style Attack” on Guam? [Click here for more...]( Putin invades Ukraine… China launches rockets over the straits of Taiwan… And as we speak, military experts are warning the US to “Prepare for a Pearl Harbor Style Attack” on Guam. [Is the beginning of World War III?]( But more importantly, there is an [exact playbook]( on what is playing out in the world and what you need to do to prepare. [Simply click here now I’ll show you how to claim your copy.]( [Paradigm]( ☰ ⊗ [ARCHIVE]( [ABOUT]( [Contact Us]( © 2022 Paradigm Press, LLC. 808 Saint Paul Street, Baltimore MD 21202. By submitting your email address, you consent to Paradigm Press, LLC. delivering daily email issues and advertisements. To end your Altucher Confidential e-mail subscription and associated external offers sent from Altucher Confidential, feel free to [click here.]( Please note: the mailbox associated with this email address is not monitored, so do not reply to this message. We welcome comments or suggestions at feedback@altucherconfidential.com. This address is for feedback only. For questions about your account or to speak with customer service, [contact us here]( or call (844)-731-0984. Although our employees may answer your general customer service questions, they are not licensed under securities laws to address your particular investment situation. No communication by our employees to you should be deemed as personalized financial advice. We allow the editors of our publications to recommend securities that they own themselves. However, our policy prohibits editors from exiting a personal trade while the recommendation to subscribers is open. In no circumstance may an editor sell a security before subscribers have a fair opportunity to exit. The length of time an editor must wait after subscribers have been advised to exit a play depends on the type of publication. All other employees and agents must wait 24 hours after on-line publication or 72 hours after the mailing of a printed-only publication prior to following an initial recommendation. Any investments recommended in this letter should be made only after consulting with your investment advisor and only after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company. Altucher Confidential is committed to protecting and respecting your privacy. We do not rent or share your email address. Please read our [Privacy Statement.]( If you are having trouble receiving your Altucher Confidential subscription, you can ensure its arrival in your mailbox by [whitelisting Altucher Confidential.](

EDM Keywords (200)

year world welcome way warning using users us upgrade understand type trust trouble transparent today time three threat though think tell taiwan system suggestions subscribers submitting straits still step stay spoiled speak solve show shortage short share see security scheme sbf reviewing response respecting reserves represent reply replicated rent regulation refuse recover recommendation recognize read rats rage quickly questions publications publication prove protocols protecting prospectus privacy printed prepare playing plan perfect people part papering outcomes open one nothing newsletter need narcissism monitored missing millions microcosm message many mailing mailbox made machine live likely licensed liabilities letter lesson length learned launched latest know james issue intention indicative importantly important image idea hundreds however holds hold history hindsight hey hate happened happen guy guam grid going glue ftx friends framing founder force following flimsy fiasco feedback failures failure explosions explain experimentation exiting exit exist exchange everything ensure end employees editors economy easy disagree difficult destroying design defi deemed dead custody cryptoland crypto consulting consent conceived compared company communication committed collapse click claiming claim cia choice chance cefi bitcoin biggest best believe begun beginning backdoor auditable assets arrival anywhere anyone always altucher allow agree age afraid advised advertisements address account access 9b 900m 2008

Marketing emails from paradigm.press

View More
Sent On

15/03/2023

Sent On

15/03/2023

Sent On

15/03/2023

Sent On

14/03/2023

Sent On

14/03/2023

Sent On

14/03/2023

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2024 SimilarMail.