Newsletter Subject

What if... a New Gold Standard?

From

paradigm.press

Email Address

AltucherConfidential@email.threefounderspublishing.com

Sent On

Tue, Oct 25, 2022 08:50 PM

Email Preheader Text

This ain’t your grandpappy’s gold standard… | If it does return, this ain’t your

This ain’t your grandpappy’s gold standard… [Altucher Confidential] October 25, 2022 [WEBSITE]( | [UNSUBSCRIBE]( If it does return, this ain’t your grandpappy’s gold standard. [Hero_Image] What if… a New Gold Standard? By Chris Campbell Attention! Before You Read Any Further… [Click here for more...]( Hey, it’s James. Before you read any further in today’s issue, an urgent situation needs your immediate attention. If you don’t plan on claiming this upgrade to your Altucher’s Investment Network subscription, you’re missing out on a huge opportunity. Right now is your chance to grab one of the biggest (and most valuable) upgrades our company has ever made to a newsletter. I’m taking Altucher’s Investment Network to an entirely new level and I’d hate to see you left behind. [To see how to claim your upgrade, just click here now.]( [Chris Campbell] CHRIS CAMPBELL Could we return to a global gold standard? Is it possible? For the record, I don’t hate gold. (At least, not as much as James hates gold.) Despite my pro crypto sensibilities, I understand the argument for it. I’m always keen on hedging my bets… And, truth be told, I don’t think a return to gold is impossible. (But would it be the most ideal timeline? Probably not.) Here, I’ll show you why many believe a gold standard is coming back… and why it might be. (But also not in the way you might think.) It’s Never Going Away The idea of a gold standard is NEVER going away. There’s always going to be some appetite for it. For a lot of reasons, most of which is simply historical precedent. Case in point: Recently, Congressman Alexander Mooney introduced Bill H.R.9157, outlining a proposal to peg every dollar in existence to a fixed weight of gold. [IMG 1] Far from unprecedented… This is the way the United States was run before the 1970s, along with other nations. In 1971, president Nixon took the dollar off of the gold standard. Other countries followed. Switzerland was the last man standing until it dropped the gold standard in 1999. So it’s only been a little over two decades where the world’s been without a gold standard. “But, We’ll NEVER Go Back!” Many people think that governments would NEVER go back to the gold standard. Why would they? They would lose the immense power of manipulating the money supply. There’s truth to that. But, there’s a case to be made that countries like the U.S. would actually benefit. If the U.S. dollar was backed by gold, the argument goes, then prices and foreign exchange rates would stabilize. This would maintain global trust in international trade during a time when the dollar’s reserve status -- and everything else -- is looking a little shaky. By the way… Trump was a YUGE fan of bringing back the gold standard for this reason. He once said, “Bringing back the gold standard would be very hard to do, but, boy, would it be wonderful.” Does it Make Sense? Could the U.S. actually return to a gold standard? That depends on how far they’re willing to go to get there. Best estimates suggest there are over 2.2 trillion dollars in circulation. Estimates also say the U.S. holds 8,133 tons of gold, or about 260,256,000 ounces. (At least, that’s what’s in the books. The U.S. gold reserves haven’t had a proper audit in over 60 years.) In today’s value, assuming this number is true, that’s worth about $431 billion. If we were switching to a new gold standard, then either the Treasury would need to at least quintuple its gold reserves… OR, the government sets a new price on gold. Not Impossible Again, neither would be unprecedented. In 1933, during the Great Depression, the U.S. government “nationalized” all gold, making it illegal for private individuals to own any of it. After citizens were forced to sell their gold at well below market rates, the government set a new official rate -- much higher, of course -- as part of the Gold Reserve Act of 1934. Seizing the gold and jacking up the price of each ounce allowed the government to print more dollars to stimulate the economy. As crazy as it sounds, gold ownership remained illegal until the 1970s, when the U.S. took the dollar off of the gold standard. Back then, it seems like few were super interested in gold. Until now. Military Experts preparing for a “Pearl Harbor Style Attack” on Guam? [Click here for more...]( Putin invades Ukraine… China launches rockets over the straits of Taiwan… And as we speak, military experts are warning the US to “Prepare for a Pearl Harbor Style Attack” on Guam. [I ts the beginning of World War III?]( But more importantly, there is an [exact playbook]( on what is playing out in the world and what you need to do to prepare. Simply click here now I’ll show you how to claim your copy. The Case For Gold One popular website, called “[WTF Happened In 1971]( shows all the ways the economy began tilting in the wrong direction since 1971, when the dollar was taken off the gold standard. For example, let’s take a look at growth in productivity and hourly compensation since 1948. [IMG 2] After 1971, productivity kept climbing, but compensation became relatively stagnant. From a different lens, here’s the growth of income of the bottom 90% of earners vs. the top 1% of earners. [IMG 3] After 1971, the bottom 90% began trending sideways while the top 1% started trending upward. Gold bugs point to a phenomenon known as the Cantillon Effect: those closest to the money printers benefit most. [There are tons of graphs like this](. Yeah. Yeah. Correlation doesn’t equal causation… sure. But it’s pretty compelling. OK. But none of that matters if countries and central banks aren’t interested in returning to gold, right? But here’s the thing… Nations Loading Up Within the past few years, BRICs nations specifically have been loading up on gold at a record pace -- up to several thousands of percent per year. And other countries have followed suit. In 2019 alone, central banks added a total 650 tons to their reserves. That was the second-highest jump in 50 years, second only to 2018… when they added 656 tons. This is quite the shift… Prior to the 2008 crisis, central banks were selling gold in droves. So what changed? I’ll tell you. “The Secret Bank that Rules the World” It has to do with the Bank of International Settlements (BIS), also known in some circles as the “secret bank that runs the world.” Located in Basel, Switzerland, the BIS is the central bank of all central banks, collectively owned by 63 central banks in countries that make up 95% of the world’s GDP. The BIS controls not just the way central banks work, but also how much banks have to hold in reserve in case of market risk and what types of assets the banks are allowed to hold in their reserves. That’s where it gets interesting. The Big Switch The BIS classifies assets in terms of three tiers. Tier 1 assets are seen as “risk-free,” and banks are required to hold at least 4% of their capital reserves in the form of Tier 1 assets. On the other hand, Tier 3 assets are the riskiest assets banks are allowed to hold in their reserves. Until recently, the BIS only had ONE asset in its “risk-free” asset class: the U.S. dollar. But that’s changed. On April 1, 2019, the BIS moved gold from Tier 3 to Tier 1 -- the safest assets possible. Here’s what’s strange… While all other nations are loading up, the United States hasn’t added any gold to its reserves in 50 years. Don’t Call it a Comeback? There are serious moves on the world stage to ‘make gold great again.’ But will it materialize into a full-blown gold standard? Time will tell. A return to the gold standard might be a better shake than our current system. But it might not be the best possible system we can muster in the digital age. We’re optimists. But we’re not against hedging our bets. That’s why, when Jim Rickards talks, we listen. And this year, he’s made some bold predictions. Not only does he predict governments will outlaw cash… they’ll also implement their own forms of digital currencies. And, when the gold standard returns, it won’t look like your grandpappy’s gold standard. [Click here for Jim’s latest predictions… and how he thinks you should begin prepping.]( Until tomorrow, [Chris Campbell] Chris Campbell For Altucher Confidential Biden’s Latest IRS Move Is A Nightmare For Everyday Americans [Click here for more...]( Biden has just put everyday Americans like you into his crosshairs. As you’ve likely heard, he’s just signed into law the biggest expansion of the IRS in our nation’s history, adding 87,000 new agents… And many warn these new agents will be used to target regular Americans just like you. That’s why you need to take action right away… [Click here now for the full story.]( [Paradigm]( ☰ ⊗ [ARCHIVE]( [ABOUT]( [Contact Us]( © 2022 Paradigm Press, LLC. 808 Saint Paul Street, Baltimore MD 21202. By submitting your email address, you consent to Paradigm Press, LLC. delivering daily email issues and advertisements. To end your Altucher Confidential e-mail subscription and associated external offers sent from Altucher Confidential, feel free to [click here.]( Please note: the mailbox associated with this email address is not monitored, so do not reply to this message. We welcome comments or suggestions at feedback@altucherconfidential.com. This address is for feedback only. For questions about your account or to speak with customer service, [contact us here]( or call (844)-731-0984. Although our employees may answer your general customer service questions, they are not licensed under securities laws to address your particular investment situation. No communication by our employees to you should be deemed as personalized financial advice. We allow the editors of our publications to recommend securities that they own themselves. However, our policy prohibits editors from exiting a personal trade while the recommendation to subscribers is open. In no circumstance may an editor sell a security before subscribers have a fair opportunity to exit. The length of time an editor must wait after subscribers have been advised to exit a play depends on the type of publication. All other employees and agents must wait 24 hours after on-line publication or 72 hours after the mailing of a printed-only publication prior to following an initial recommendation. Any investments recommended in this letter should be made only after consulting with your investment advisor and only after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company. Altucher Confidential is committed to protecting and respecting your privacy. We do not rent or share your email address. Please read our [Privacy Statement.]( If you are having trouble receiving your Altucher Confidential subscription, you can ensure its arrival in your mailbox by [whitelisting Altucher Confidential.](

EDM Keywords (214)

year would worth world wonderful without within willing well ways way warning used us upgrade unprecedented understand types type ts truth true took tons told today time thinks think terms tell taken take taiwan switching suggestions subscribers submitting strange straits stimulate speak signed show share sell seen see security runs run rules reviewing returning return respecting reserves reserve required reply rent record recommendation recently reasons reason read quite questions publications publication protecting prospectus proposal productivity privacy printed print prices price prepare possible playing plan past part optimists open number none nightmare newsletter need nations nation muster much monitored missing might message matters materialize manipulating make mailing mailbox made lot looking look loading little listen like licensed letter length least law jim james jacking issue irs interested income impossible importantly illegal idea however hold hey hedging hate hard guam growth grandpappy government gold go get gdp forms form forced following feedback far exiting exit existence ensure end employees either editors economy droves dropped dollars dollar depends deemed crosshairs crazy course countries copy consulting consent company communication committed comeback closest click claiming claim citizens circles changed chance case call books bis biggest biden bets beginning banks bank backed assets arrival argument appetite altucher also allowed allow advised advertisements address added account 95 2018 1999 1971 1970s 1933

Marketing emails from paradigm.press

View More
Sent On

15/03/2023

Sent On

15/03/2023

Sent On

15/03/2023

Sent On

14/03/2023

Sent On

14/03/2023

Sent On

14/03/2023

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.