The Fed’s Critical Leak to the Mainstream Press

Here’s the Fed’s Next Move [The Daily Reckoning] October 24, 2022 [WEBSITE]( | [UNSUBSCRIBE]( The Fed’s Critical Leak to the Mainstream Press - The Fed leaks its November plans to its “unofficial official source”… - The Fed’s target rate could be 5.50% by next March… - Why the Fed has put politics aside ahead of next month’s midterm elections… [Urgent Note From Jim Rickards: “You’re Running Out Of Time!”]( [Click here for more...]( Your exclusive “Pro level” upgrade to Strategic Intelligence is ready to be claimed. This is your chance to claim 3 exciting new benefits along with a whole new level of service. Hurry… you only have until the timer hits 0 to act… [Click Here ASAP]( Portsmouth, New Hampshire October 24, 2022 [Jim Rickards] JIM RICKARDS Dear Reader , The Fed will raise interest rates 0.75% at the end of its next FOMC policy meeting on Nov. 2. That’s not an official announcement, but it might as well be because it came from the Fed’s unofficial official source. If that sounds confusing, please allow us to explain... The Fed never announces its rate policy decisions in advance. These are announced in the form of a press release and statement distributed at precisely 2:00 p.m. ET on the second day of each Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) meeting. The next meeting is Nov. 1⁠–2, and the announcement will be made at 2:00 p.m. ET on Nov. 2. This will be followed by a press conference with Fed Chair Jay Powell who will explain the policy change and answer reporters’ questions. On the other hand, this is the “no drama” Fed. They want to avoid shocks to the market. They want to avoid surprises. So they have to find a way to let the world know what they are going to do in advance of the formal announcement so that stock and bond markets can adjust smoothly to the new rate policy. How do they accomplish that? Don’t Tell Anyone — Wink, Wink They do it by leaks to the media. But not just any media. The Fed settles on a chosen reporter who then becomes the unofficial channel for the official leak. This reporter changes from time to time. Formerly it was a guy named Greg Ip. Today the chosen one is Nick Timiraos of The Wall Street Journal. Timiraos is reporting that “Federal Reserve officials are barreling toward another interest rate rise of 0.75 percentage points at the meeting Nov. 1⁠–2 and are likely to debate then whether and how to signal plans to approve a smaller increase in December.” This reporting is doubly informative. Not only do we learn that the Fed will raise rates by 0.75% on Nov. 2, but we receive a strong indication that the rate hike at the following meeting on Dec. 14 will be 0.50%. That would put the fed funds target rate at 4.50% by year-end, which is what Powell indicated at his Sept. 21 press conference. Of course, any reporter can speculate on what the Fed will do and use whatever sourcing they chose. But there’s only one definitive conduit for leaks at a time. To see what the Fed is doing in advance you only have to know the chosen reporter (Nick Timiraos) and believe what he says. That’s because it’s actually coming from the Fed. [Strange 2021 Prophecy Rapidly Coming True]( [Click here for more...]( America’s #1 Futurist George Gilder is telling American’s to “brace yourself” for the coming $16.8 trillion revolution. This same revolution could redefine millions of jobs and radically transform the way just about every major corporation does business. It could even change the way you get paid, save and invest for retirement. And, says George, it could make you exceedingly rich… [Click Here To See Why]( More Leaks Besides that, there’s other solid reporting about Fed activity coming from a number of outlets including The New York Times. The Times’ Jeanna Smialek reports that “Investors have entirely priced in a fourth consecutive three-quarter-point move at the Fed’s Nov. 1-2 meeting, and officials have made no effort to change that expectation.” That’s not as definitive as the Nick Timiraos report in The Wall Street Journal but it’s strongly worded and sends the same message. But Smialek goes further and offers a good analysis of what comes next at the Fed meetings on Dec. 13⁠–14, 2022, and its early calendar for 2023 including meetings on Feb. 1 and March 22, 2023. Smialek speculates that after the 0.75% rate hike on Nov. 2, the Fed may still engage in a strip of 0.50% rate hikes on Dec. 14, Feb. 1 and March 22. If all four of those future rate hikes happened, the Fed funds target rate would be 5.50% by March 22, 2023. That’s an amazing amount of monetary tightening considering that rates were 0.0% as late as March 14, 2022. The reasons offered for this forecast include the persistence of inflation through September 2022 despite five rate hikes from March to September. Powell’s Serious Fed Chair Jay Powell made it clear both in his Aug. 26, 2022, remarks in Jackson Hole, Wyoming, and again at his Washington, D.C., press conference on Sept. 21 that fighting inflation is Job 1 and the Fed will tolerate both higher unemployment and a recession to achieve that goal. There’s little doubt that the Fed can crush inflation given enough time. The difficulty is that the cost will be high in terms of lost growth, lost income, business failures and much higher unemployment. The Fed could probably stop monetary tightening today and inflation would come down because growth is already slowing around the world. But the Fed needs to see headline inflation come down both for political and policy reasons before they stop tightening. That’s a recipe for over-tightening since the drop in inflation lags the monetary tightening. It wouldn’t be the Fed’s first blunder (there are many) and it won’t be the last. That likelihood becomes more apparent based on Smialek’s reporting. I’ll tell you who isn’t happy about current Fed policy — the Biden administration and Democrats who are up for reelection in two weeks. [Lightning is striking right now… and you still have a chance to save your retirement during this new recession…]( [Click here for more...]( Do you really think the worst of the stock market crash is over? … or is the real plummet still ahead? Whatever happens, there is good news… With an investment that’s different from stocks, bonds, or real estate… You can take advantage of lightning striking… … and you might pocket 8,788% gains… [Click Here To Discover How]( The Fed’s “Independence” From Politics First off, the Fed likes to make a big deal about how it’s “independent” of political influence. But nothing could be further from the truth. In reality, the Fed is a highly political institution. It’s just that they do a better job of hiding their politics than most inside-the-Beltway organizations. The Fed can support or frustrate White House policies by easing or restricting monetary policy to counteract the effects of tax cuts, increased spending or budget belt-tightening. Fed chairman Arthur Burns accommodated Nixon’s “request” in the early 1970s to ease monetary policy ahead of the 1972 presidential election. A German reporter supposedly asked Burns why he did it. Burns replied that a Fed chairman has to do what the president wants or else “the central bank would lose its independence.” Can you imagine a more ridiculous answer? Make Sure Trump Doesn’t Get Reelected! Meanwhile, before the 2020 presidential election, Bill Dudley suggested that the Fed should oppose Trump’s re-election efforts by rejecting easier monetary policy. Dudley is the former president of the highly influential New York Fed, so it wasn’t just some crank saying this. Dudley said the outcome of the election was “within the Fed’s purview” because a second Trump term threatened the global economy as well as the Fed’s political independence (hah!). The pandemic came along later, so the Fed was forced to ease policy. But the point is the Fed is hardly independent of politics. What does it mean that the Fed has been continuing to aggressively raise rates ahead of the midterm elections? The Fed Abandons Politics — for Now Well, it’s certainly not because the Fed is looking to help get Republicans elected. For every Republican economist the Fed has, it has at least 10 Democrats. And within the Fed’s Board of Governors, the ratio of Democrat economists to Republican economists is 48 to 1. So you can rule politics out. The reason the Fed’s been aggressively tightening ahead of the midterm elections is because the Fed is deeply concerned about inflation and is willing to put politics aside in order to get inflation under control — for now at least. The Fed’s strategic leaks to the media are proof of it. If the Fed can wipe out inflation by the 2024 election, it'll insert itself into politics again. Regards, Jim Rickards for The Daily Reckoning P.S. In my 2011 book Currency Wars, I warned that the U.S. was engaged in a special type of economic war. I said that these wars would: Degenerate into sequential bouts of inflation, recession, retaliation and actual violence as the scramble for resources leads to invasion and war. The historical precedents are sobering… Some version of the worst-case scenario is almost inevitable. Now with Putin invading Ukraine, rising tensions with China, inflation, recession, supply chain issues and the potential for greater violence breaking out all over the world… It seems my predictions are coming true. [That’s why I recorded this short video message.]( I want to help you prepare for what I fear is coming next. Because if history is any indicator, there could be real trouble ahead. [Click here to view my urgent video message.]( Thank you for reading The Daily Reckoning! We greatly value your questions and comments. Please send all feedback to [feedback@dailyreckoning.com.](mailto:feedback@dailyreckoning.com) [Jim Rickards] [James G. Rickards]( is the editor of Strategic Intelligence. He is an American lawyer, economist, and investment banker with 35 years of experience working in capital markets on Wall Street. He is the author of The New York Times bestsellers Currency Wars and The Death of Money. [Paradigm]( ☰ ⊗ [ARCHIVE]( [ABOUT]( [Contact Us]( © 2022 Paradigm Press, LLC. 808 Saint Paul Street, Baltimore MD 21202. By submitting your email address, you consent to Paradigm Press, LLC. delivering daily email issues and advertisements. To end your The Daily Reckoning e-mail subscription and associated external offers sent from The Daily Reckoning, feel free to [click here.]( Please note: the mailbox associated with this email address is not monitored, so do not reply to this message. We welcome comments or suggestions at feedback@dailyreckoning.com. This address is for feedback only. For questions about your account or to speak with customer service, [contact us here]( or call (844)-731-0984. Although our employees may answer your general customer service questions, they are not licensed under securities laws to address your particular investment situation. No communication by our employees to you should be deemed as personalized financial advice. We allow the editors of our publications to recommend securities that they own themselves. However, our policy prohibits editors from exiting a personal trade while the recommendation to subscribers is open. In no circumstance may an editor sell a security before subscribers have a fair opportunity to exit. The length of time an editor must wait after subscribers have been advised to exit a play depends on the type of publication. All other employees and agents must wait 24 hours after on-line publication or 72 hours after the mailing of a printed-only publication prior to following an initial recommendation. Any investments recommended in this letter should be made only after consulting with your investment advisor and only after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company. The Daily Reckoning is committed to protecting and respecting your privacy. We do not rent or share your email address. Please read our [Privacy Statement.]( If you are having trouble receiving your The Daily Reckoning subscription, you can ensure its arrival in your mailbox by [whitelisting The Daily Reckoning.](