Newsletter Subject

Dodgy As Hell

From

paradigm.press

Email Address

RudeAwakening@email.paradigm-press.net

Sent On

Tue, Sep 28, 2021 10:00 AM

Email Preheader Text

Fed Heads Eric Rosengren and Robert Kaplan resigned their posts yesterday. When bigwigs “resign

Fed Heads Eric Rosengren and Robert Kaplan resigned their posts yesterday. When bigwigs “resign,” that means colloquially, they were fired. Were you forwarded this email? [Sign-up to Rude Awakening here.]( [Unsubscribe]( [The Rude Awakening] Dodgy As Hell - Fed Heads Eric Rosengren and Robert Kaplan resigned their posts yesterday. - When bigwigs “resign,” that means colloquially, they were fired. But they weren’t really fired; they just walked before they were pushed. Get it? - This reminds me of another prominent member of the USG. But she ain’t getting fired, is she? Recommended Link [Have you heard George Gilder’s latest extraordinary prediction yet?]( [Click here for more...]( He was dubbed the “Tech Prophet” by Forbes… once won the White House Award for Entrepreneurial Excellence… and his work is respected by tech insiders like Bill Gates and former Google CEO Eric Schmidt… And recently, Gilder went on camera to explain how a new tech revolution is about to hit America… one that could unleash up to $15.1 trillion in new wealth. According to Gilder, if you don’t understand this new tech you could miss out on one of the greatest moneymaking opportunities for thirty five years. [Get More Details Here]( Sean Ring Editor, Rude Awakening It’s a fine Tuesday morning here at the Far Eastern Colonial Office of Paradigm Press. I hope you’re well and thriving. Before I get to today’s debacle, let me apologize for my slow replies to the mailbag. I’ve read all that you’ve sent, but I haven’t had a chance to write back. I will do so this week. Thank you for your patience. One last thing, after yesterday’s rather positive message, I feel I’ve let you stick out your chin for me. I’ll try to be gentle. This one is a doozy. Fed Up With the BS Boston Fed President Eric Rosengren and Dallas Fed President Robert Kaplan have resigned their positions following allegations of insider trading. Okay, there was no mention of insider trading, nor any impropriety, for that matter. But it's dodgy as hell that two men who help control the economy by manipulating interest rates are trading single stocks. The counterargument is that they’re too high up to influence, or be affected by, single stocks. Maybe those people are right. Nevertheless, it’s not a good look. I don't mind if they own broad market mutual funds. Broad market mutual funds and ETFs (exchange-traded funds) are fully diversified. Their investors can't possibly benefit from insider trading, and they'll make a return in line with the market. What these guys can do when they're trading single stocks is to make abnormal returns trading on information… well, we don’t know what information they’re trading on. That’s the problem. We can’t prove they’re cheating, and they won’t prove to us they’re not. This is just fine for private individuals. But it’s not acceptable when you’re in a position that’s supposed to be “pure as the driven snow.” Sound familiar? Is Paul “The Profit” Pelosi a Prophet? Hung-Wah WhatsApped me yesterday about Nancy “$15,000 Fridge” Pelosi. He told me about an app that allows you to “piggyback” her trades once they’re entered into the Congressional record. The trades are entered 45 days after they’re executed. “Why?” you ask. Because Nancy Pelosi's dodgy-as-hell husband, Paul, is currently nine of nine this year with his trading picks. That’s a trading record that’d make Peter Lynch of Fidelity Magellan fame blush. Interestingly, a Villanova alumnus named Chris Joseph built the app. It’s called [Iris](. Here’s a screenshot of the group created to follow her - sorry, her husband’s - trades: According to [Investopedia]( “Many people may be surprised to learn that until recently, trading based on material nonpublic information—otherwise known as insider trading—was both legal and commonplace among members of Congress.” This allegedly ended with the STOCK Act of 2012. STOCK stands for Stop Trading on Congressional Knowledge. But clearly, the STOCK Act hasn't stopped insiders like Pelosi from making boatloads of money. Nancy Pelosi's salary is about $225,000, while Paul Pelosi plays with millions of dollars in stock options and wins all the time. To remind you, stock options are highly levered bets with time decay. That means you control a load of assets with little down, have to pick the right stocks, and get the timing right. This is extremely difficult for most investors. But not for Paul Pelosi. Nine out of nine this year. And we're not supposed to assume that there's some sort of insider trading going on here. What district does Nancy Pelosi represent? The 12th District of California. San Francisco. The financial center of Silicon Valley. Wall Street West. Recommended Link [Amazon’s Richest CEO Snubs Congress]( [Click here for more...]( After stepping down as CEO of Amazon, the world’s richest man refused to testify at a senate hearing on wealth inequality. It could be because his latest project has the potential to make him — and thousands of American’s — even more wealthy. Billions of Dollars are at stake in this project. Don’t miss out... [Click Here Now]( Of course, many people who live far from San Fran trade tech stocks. But their wives don’t have those kinds of political connections. From a [Forbes article]( published last year: Insider trading by a member of Congress is a crime. To bring a case here, however, federal authorities must overcome two obstacles: the Speech and Debate Clause, and proving “materiality” in novel circumstances. Indeed, the announcement that the authorities have closed their investigations into three senators [for potential COVID-related trading - Ed.] may show these obstacles already have proven too steep. Federal law prohibits securities trades while possessing material, non-public information in violation of a duty to a third party. In the STOCK Act of 2012, Congress clarified that insider trading laws bind members of Congress (as well as the President and members of the executive branch). Federal authorities, however, never have prosecuted a member of Congress under the STOCK Act, although they have prosecuted members (including former Representative Chris Collins) for insider trading on information acquired outside Congressional duties. I encourage you to click on the link to read the Forbes article for a full legal explanation of the situation. Mrs. Pelosi is the speaker of the House of Representatives in the United States Congress. There is no reason for her not to know what's happening inside these companies should she choose to see what's happening. The Pelosis are not short of a dollar. They've done very well over the years. Nancy Pelosi has been in Congress for a very long time - since 1987, actually. To me, it’s obvious why public trust has broken down. There are numerous reasons, but perhaps none more so than elected officials and appointed officials like Rosengren, Kaplan, and Pelosi benefiting from their knowledge with outsized returns. It is an absolute disgrace and makes a mockery of the system. Now, I do not doubt that Speaker Pelosi is following the STOCK Act to the letter. But I have many a doubt that she's following the STOCK Act to the spirit. I hasten to add that she made a bundle via her husband this year, who’s also covered under the STOCK Act. Of course, this raises questions. It's high time that we have another look at the STOCK Act. Funnily enough, recent attempts to strengthen the STOCK Act, indeed directed squarely at Speaker Pelosi, have failed. Of course, she's going to mobilize her troops inside Congress to make sure that never happens because no matter how much you've made, you want to make more. Just like Uncle Artie reminded us yesterday, "Wealth is like seawater. The more you drink, the thirstier you get." And boy, is Nancy Pelosi one thirsty woman! STOCK Act? Phooey. How about a spell in the stocks instead? Have a great day ahead! All the best, Sean Ring Editor, Rude Awakening [Whitelist Us]( | [Archive]( | [Privacy Policy]( | [Unsubscribe]( Rude Awakening is committed to protecting and respecting your privacy. We do not rent or share your email address. By submitting your email address, you consent to Paradigm Press delivering daily email issues and advertisements. To end your Rude Awakening e-mail subscription and associated external offers sent from Rude Awakening, feel free to [unsubscribe](. Please read our [Privacy Statement.]( If you are you having trouble receiving your Rude Awakening subscription, you can ensure its arrival in your mailbox by [whitelisting us.]( © 2021 Paradigm Press, LLC. 808 Saint Paul Street, Baltimore MD 21202. Although our employees may answer your general customer service questions, they are not licensed under securities laws to address your particular investment situation. No communication by our employees to you should be deemed as personalized financial advice. We expressly forbid our writers from having a financial interest in any security they personally recommend to our readers. All of our employees and agents must wait 24 hours after on-line publication or 72 hours after the mailing of a printed-only publication prior to following an initial recommendation. Any investments recommended in this letter should be made only after consulting with your investment advisor and only after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company. Email Reference ID: 470SJNED01

Marketing emails from paradigm.press

View More
Sent On

15/03/2023

Sent On

15/03/2023

Sent On

15/03/2023

Sent On

14/03/2023

Sent On

14/03/2023

Sent On

14/03/2023

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2024 SimilarMail.