Newsletter Subject

Liverpool Loses UNESCO World Heritage Site Status in Supranational Overreach

From

paradigm.press

Email Address

RudeAwakening@email.paradigm-press.net

Sent On

Tue, Aug 3, 2021 10:06 AM

Email Preheader Text

Outside the United Kingdom, it's mostly known as the home of the Beetles. If you go back a little bi

Outside the United Kingdom, it's mostly known as the home of the Beetles. If you go back a little bit further, it’s where most of the British ex-pats Were you forwarded this email? [Sign-up to Rude Awakening here.]( [Unsubscribe]( [The Rude Awakening] Liverpool Loses UNESCO World Heritage Site Status in Supranational Overreach - Liverpool Bramley Docks removed from World Heritage Site list. - The city worked hard to clean up its docks. - UNESCO disagrees with the new building structures and investment. Recommended Link [This man just revealed a $6.6 trillion secret]( [Click here for more...]( This man recently blew the lid off a growing international conflict that’s already moving $6.6 trillion a day. Yes, trillion… Every. Single. Day. More importantly — he revealed his proprietary secret for profiting from this massive daily flow of capital. If you want in... [Click Here Now]( Sean Ring Editor, Rude Awakening Happy Tuesday! Today, I write about supranational overreach and the absurdity of the World Heritage title. She Looks Great at Night! Have a care for Liverpool, everyone. Often derided as a place inhabited only by thieving welfare queens, Liverpool has a rough reputation inside the United Kingdom. Outside the United Kingdom, it's mostly known as the home of the Beetles. If you go back a little bit further, it’s where most of the British ex-pats would depart on their boats to America. Recently Liverpool has been a European Capital of Culture, however ridiculous that may sound. Liverpool Bramley Dock, where all the passengers departed for the New World, was labeled a World Heritage Site. According to [Smithsonian Magazine]( UNESCO added the city to its list in 2004 in recognition of its role in world trade in the 18th and 19th centuries. Liverpool was one of the United Kingdom’s most important ports at a time when the British Empire was becoming a dominant force around the world. The listing also reflected innovative technology and building techniques of the city’s maritime industry. People there developed new types of docks, new warehouse construction techniques, and industrial canals that served as models for other port cities. The benefits of being labeled a World Heritage Site seem self-evident. An increase in tourism, a higher profile, national pride, and civic pride are all pretty qualifiable, if not quantifiable. But the costs of World Heritage Sites are starting to get looked at a little bit more closely. Oman, Germany, and now Liverpool have lost their World Heritage status. UNESCO has stripped the English city of Liverpool of its status as a UNESCO World Heritage Site, citing “the irreversible loss of attributes conveying the outstanding universal value of the property” due to new development. Benefits and Costs It's becoming increasingly tricky for places that were once small and now have been inundated by tourists to maintain World Heritage status. Places like George Town in Penang, Malaysia, or Hoi An in Vietnam, are lovely to visit. Of course, with the increase in air travel over the past two decades, many people have flocked to these places. And it follows, of course, that it's such a big money winner, the governments have put up more hotels. Let's make the infrastructure better. Let's cater to the people paying us, the tourists. That seems all together normal to me. Of course, UNESCO has jumped in and said in effect, “Well, listen, if you're going to put up all this modern stuff, we're going to yank your status.” It goes against everything that these places have fought for, which is name brand recognition. I'll happily admit a lot of the structures going up at Liverpool's docks are ugly. It's just it does make the place look a little bit overdone, in my opinion. You may not know that both Liverpool and Everton are from Liverpool. Everton was the older club, and Liverpool FC split out from them. But Everton has since been playing second fiddle to the six-time European Cup winners. Recommended Link [This Piece of Tech Is Powering a $30 Trillion Megatrend]( [Click here for more...]( See this piece of tech this man is holding in his hand? It’s part of a new $30 trillion trend that’s set to dominate this decade. [When you click here and watch a demo…]( You’ll see why this is BIGGER than blockchain, artificial intelligence, 5G, robotics, and the Internet of Things… COMBINED. Warren Buffett, Jeff Bezos, and Elon Musk are all in. Do they know something that you don’t? [Click Here For More Details]( Just the Way You Are Well, Everton has just agreed to build a brand new stadium right on the dock. For those of you in the states, this is akin to when the Yankees were going to make the new Yankee Stadium on the west side of Manhattan, where the Hudson Yards development is. Of course, that got shelved, and they just moved the stadium a block in the Bronx for a reason that I still can't fathom. Anyway, the stadium looks fabulous (on paper). It's right on the water. The stadium itself, in my opinion, would become a cultural icon, but UNESCO wasn’t having any of it. So UNESCO has just yanked Liverpool's World Heritage status. I've been to Liverpool twice. Honestly, I didn't think much of it. But if we go back to Kahneman and Tversky and their Prospect Theory, you may remember that losing has three times more impact than winning. We feel three times as bad when we fail as we feel good when we win. This is a big blow for Liverpool. It's not nice getting our gongs and baubles (as the English would say) taken away from us. People who are as neurotic as I especially feel it. William Shakespeare famously said, "’ Tis better to have loved and lost than never to have loved at all." Neurotic people tend to disagree with that sentiment. Side note: if you carry a torch for somebody, I strongly suggest you go to LinkedIn and see your “lost love” 10 to 20 years later. Some of the most nubile, supple, fresh-faced girls of my youth have turned into absolute horror shows. The Real Costs After all this, it’s only natural to look at the costs of being a World Heritage Site. It's interesting to note how expensive it is to keep World Heritage status in this UK report. It's not a fee necessarily. It's all the ongoing costs to make sure that you don't piss off UNESCO. The benefits of being named a UNESCO World Heritage Site are partnership, additional funding, conservation, regeneration, tourism, civic pride, social capital, and learning and education. Although very difficult to quantify, I think they're good benefits. But this UK report says the overall cost associated with World Heritage status is difficult to define. “This is largely due to the fact, the sites are so different in terms of ownership, scale, nature, and location,” it reads. The bidding costs associated with becoming a World Heritage Site are incurred in four main areas, excluding the management plan. A World Heritage Site coordinator estimated at between £36,000 and £42,000 per year (not dollars) on average over four to eight years, which comes out to £185,000 to £216,000. The partner and consultation time is estimated at £41,000 for partners over the same 4.8 years, and between £15,000 and £100,000 for public consultation. The production costs in a nomination are between £15,000 and £50,000. The cost of supporting studies is estimated between £20,000 and £80,000 per study. Pay For Status, Get the Oversight Since we're used to dealing with trillions, this is peanuts. Of course, you'd pay for this. But what's happening here is the UN is holding this over with sites to keep it as old as it always has been. And it doesn't leave any room for urban renewal, which again goes against everything these sites may strive for. It reminds me of those people who go to Cuba and pray that it doesn't get any better because they want to keep it an open-air museum to communism. I've never heard anything more stupid in my whole life, and I've written about that before. So I think what needs to happen is that UNESCO has to make allowances for the future and allow these sites to grow with the added tourism that they surely will benefit from. After all, it's a money game, and that's the whole point of being a World Heritage Site, to begin with. Have a great Tuesday! All the best, Sean Ring Editor, Rude Awakening Recommended Link [Billionaire Leaves Crowd In Shock]( [Click here for more...]( An audience of a few hundred (including myself) quietly gathered in Washington D.C. a few months back. That’s when the world’s richest man, Elon Musk, took the stage… and shocked the entire room. It all has to do with this image you see on your screen… showing a surprising new discovery he’s made. Not only will this blow you away… it could also transform the American economy forever. [See Elon's Shocking Reveal]( [Whitelist Us]( | [Archive]( | [Privacy Policy]( | [Unsubscribe]( Rude Awakening is committed to protecting and respecting your privacy. We do not rent or share your email address. By submitting your email address, you consent to Paradigm Press delivering daily email issues and advertisements. To end your Rude Awakening e-mail subscription and associated external offers sent from Rude Awakening, feel free to [unsubscribe](. Please read our [Privacy Statement.]( If you are you having trouble receiving your Rude Awakening subscription, you can ensure its arrival in your mailbox by [whitelisting us.]( © 2021 Paradigm Press, LLC. 808 Saint Paul Street, Baltimore MD 21202. Although our employees may answer your general customer service questions, they are not licensed under securities laws to address your particular investment situation. No communication by our employees to you should be deemed as personalized financial advice. We expressly forbid our writers from having a financial interest in any security they personally recommend to our readers. All of our employees and agents must wait 24 hours after on-line publication or 72 hours after the mailing of a printed-only publication prior to following an initial recommendation. Any investments recommended in this letter should be made only after consulting with your investment advisor and only after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company. Email Reference ID: 470SJNED01

EDM Keywords (218)

youth yankees yank written writers write world winning win way water watch washington want visit vietnam used unsubscribe unesco un ugly tversky turned trillions tourists tourism torch time think terms tech surely submitting stupid stripped still status states starting stage stadium somebody small sites since shocked share set served seems see security said room role right reviewing revealed respecting rent reminds recognition reason reads readers quantify quantifiable put protecting prospectus profiting privacy printed pray powering places piss piece people peanuts pay partners partner part paper opinion one old note nomination night never neurotic needs natural named moved models may manhattan man make mailing mailbox made lovely loved lot lost losing look location liverpool list linkedin lid licensed letter leave learning labeled know keep kahneman jumped inundated internet interesting incurred increase importantly impact image home holding hoi happening happen hand grow governments gongs going goes go get future four fought forwarded follows following flocked fail fact expensive everything everton estimated ensure end employees dominate dollars docks dock disagree difficult different details demo define deemed decade dealing cuba course costs cost consulting consent communism communication committed comes click clean city cater carry care capital build bronx boats blow block bigger better benefits benefit begin beetles becoming baubles bad away average audience arrival always allow akin agreed advertisements address absurdity 2004 18th

Marketing emails from paradigm.press

View More
Sent On

15/03/2023

Sent On

15/03/2023

Sent On

15/03/2023

Sent On

14/03/2023

Sent On

14/03/2023

Sent On

14/03/2023

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.