Newsletter Subject

These Lady Builders Earned Your Admiration.... Not You, Mackenzie.

From

paradigm.press

Email Address

RudeAwakening@email.paradigm-press.net

Sent On

Wed, Jun 16, 2021 10:01 AM

Email Preheader Text

Even if it’s your hard-earned cash, just shut up about it and give it away. But when you didn

Even if it’s your hard-earned cash, just shut up about it and give it away. But when you didn’t earn it, it’s even worthier of derision. Were you forwarded this email? [Sign-up to Rude Awakening here.]( [Unsubscribe]( [The Rude Awakening] These Lady Builders Earned Your Admiration…. Not You, Mackenzie. - Mackenzie Scott (formerly Bezos) is giving away “her” fortune. - The women on my list genuinely earned respect - and their riches. - Just for fun, some are married to rich men, but not as rich as they are! Recommended Link [Your Invitation Expires at 1:00pm ET]( [Click here for more...]( We don't really have time to mess around... Because [at 1:00pm ET today]( Jim Rickards is revealing a whole new way of making money that could allow you to skim HUGE potential profits off a MASSIVE daily flow of cash. The best part: Jim’s new profit tactic has already shown the potential to find 160% returns every 45 days, on average… With a data-proven “win ratio” of up to 90% in simulated trading. This is your LAST CHANCE to accept his free invitation. [Click Here To Confirm Your Spot]( Sean Ring Editor, Rude Awakening Good morning! It’s Wednesday already. Just in time for a bit of snark with your morning coffee. This piece is about admiring the right people. And it’s a bit of fun, as well. The Charity Industrial Complex Strikes Again! 6 “Be careful not to practice your righteousness in front of others to be seen by them. If you do, you will have no reward from your Father in heaven. 2 “So when you give to the needy, do not announce it with trumpets, as the hypocrites do in the synagogues and on the streets, to be honored by others. Truly I tell you, they have received their reward in full. 3 But when you give to the needy, do not let your left hand know what your right hand is doing, 4 so that your giving may be in secret. Then your Father, who sees what is done in secret, will reward you. Matthew 6:1-4 I may be a terrible Catholic, but even I know when to respect the Big Book. In my mind, there’s no more obnoxious virtue signaling than announcing you’re giving away your money. Even if it’s your hard-earned cash, just shut up about it and give it away. But when you didn’t earn it, it’s even worthier of derision. It’s like saying, “Look at me! I didn’t make this money, but I still want a tax deduction.” And that leads me to the newly minted Mackenzie Scott. The meme, back in the day. The former Mrs Bezos is giving away a large portion of her ex-husband’s money. [The Wall Street Journal]( reported that Ms Scott will give away $22 billion (of “her” $59.8 billion fortune). The piece, written by Talal Ansari, had a couple of choice quotes in it. “Putting large donors at the center of stories on social progress is a distortion of their role.” No, it’s not. It’s just better when they remain anonymous. “In this effort, we are governed by a humbling belief that it would be better if disproportionate wealth were not concentrated in a small number of hands, and that the solutions are best designed and implemented by others.” How come she didn’t feel this way while she was married? Asking for a friend… Whenever I bring up this subject, I get replies like, “Well, she deserves it. She raised his 4 children while he built Amazon!” I’m sure Mr Bezos is grateful. But boy, $60 billion? I’m pretty sure she didn’t head up any divisions of Amazon, as well. To me, there’s no greater proof of the inability to build something - like a company - than giving all your money away. Especially when it’s not really yours; when it’s house money. Real Women Entrepreneurs With all this said, there are some fabulous female entrepreneurs conquering the world. They deserve everyone’s admiration, whether from girl or woman, man or boy. As I try to keep the Rude to 1,500 words or so, I’ve only included my favorite five. There are many, many more. - Sara Blakely How about having a husband, four children, and building a multi-billion dollar company by yourself? I give you Sara Blakely, creator, founder, and CEO of Spanx. Sara represents the ultimate in the “think it, manifest it, share it” space. She took her idea from seed to mature company, helping women everywhere keep their bits in the right spots. Caveat One Night Stand, boys! Sara is married to Jimmy Itzler, an enormously successful entrepreneur, himself. They also co-own a portion of the Atlanta Hawks. He’s only worth 9 figures, compared to her 10. 2. Diane von Furstenberg Diane von Furstenberg has lived a life many only dream of. The Belgian fashion designer is the daughter of a Greek Holocaust survivor and an Eastern European father. DVF married a German Catholic prince and during the time of their marriage was styled Her Serene Highness Princess Diane of Fürstenberg. Once they divorced, she lost the right to use the title, but kept his surname. Von Furstenburg once said, "The minute I knew I was about to be [Prince] Egon's wife, I decided to have a career. I wanted to be someone of my own, and not just a plain little girl who got married beyond her deserts." And boy, did she! Newsweek once called her, “the most marketable woman since Coco Chanel.” Her wrap dresses are so iconic, they’re included in the Costume Institute of the Metropolitan Museum of Art. Since 2001, von Furstenburg has been married to Barry Diller, the famous American media magnate. She’s worth roughly $1.5 billion; he, around $4 billion. Escorting Mrs Ring in her favorite DVF wrap dress, just before we got married, 10 years ago. Recommended Link [Claim Access Now]( [Click here for more...]( If you know anything about Jim Rickards at all, you know that he's been right about virtually every major financial happening of the last two decades… The gold run-up of the early 2000s, the Crash of 2008, the Washington “stimulus bubble,” Brexit’s effects, COVID’s economic fallout, and more. You also know how much you could’ve profited from all these calls — and many others he's made in the past. That’s why it’s super-important that you make yourself available this coming [Wednesday, June 16th, at 1:00 PM (details here)]( Because that’s when I’ll be throwing back the curtain on my NEXT major financial prediction — and my new, proprietary system designed to help you profit from it. [Click Here To Gain Access]( 3. Whitney Wolfe Herd Whitney Wolfe Herd wins the award for “Greatest Kick in the Ex-Boyfriend’s Goolies.” Imagine being a part of the founding team of Tinder, designing the logo, getting it popular on college campuses, and then getting booted out. But she wouldn’t take it lying down! Wolfe Herd sued two of her co-founders - with one she had a brief romance - for sexual harassment and discrimination. This was settled out of court for an undisclosed sum. Then, Herd co-founded Bumble, which went public this year. She’s the youngest woman ever to bring a company public, at age 31. Herd is worth about $1.5 billion. She’s married to Michael Herd, heir to an oil fortune. They have one son. 4. Melanie Perkins I use Canva all the time, and I have Australian Melanie Perkins to thank for founding that unbelievable resource. Canva is an online graphic design tool that makes it easy to create all sorts of stuff. Logos, desktop wallpaper, LinkedIn banners, YouTube icons… you name it, you can design it on Canva. Canva is one of the few tech unicorns that’s actually profitable. According to the Australian Financial Review, Perkins is worth nearly A$8 billion (about $6.17 billion). She’s married to fellow Canva co-founder Cliff Obrecht. 5. JK Rowling If Rowling knew who I was, the self-proclaimed socialist would hate this so much. But what else can you call her? This is a woman who, when her back was against the wall, took up her pen in a local Starbucks, and created a multibillion dollar industry in the process. Heck, she typed out the first Harry Potter book on a manual typewriter! Calling her an author is altogether misleading. Like it or not, and she’d probably dislike it intensely, she’s the ultimate entrepreneur in many ways. She took one talent (writing) and then branched out into websites, toys, and theme parks. The woman is a titan of industry. I do wish she’d give herself more credit. Yes, she collected welfare when she had no other choice. Who wouldn’t? But then she gave back, with interest all out of proportion to that which she took. As she didn’t flee to Monaco (like I would’ve), she paid truckloads in tax and quietly gave much of her money away. In 2012 Forbes removed Rowling from their rich list after 8 years of being there, claiming that her US$160 million in charitable donations and the high tax rate in the UK meant she was no longer a billionaire. What a gal! The Fab Five These women deserve every ounce of honor they receive. They’re worthy of emulation by all. They’re builders. And that’s what this world needs above all. What it doesn’t need are the calls to disperse your capital before you’ve actually built something. And we get that far too often from people who should know better. But hey, the empty vessel makes the most noise. Have a Wonderful Wednesday! All the best, Sean Ring Editor, Rude Awakening [Whitelist Us]( | [Archive]( | [Privacy Policy]( | [Unsubscribe]( Rude Awakening is committed to protecting and respecting your privacy. We do not rent or share your email address. By submitting your email address, you consent to Paradigm Press delivering daily email issues and advertisements. To end your Rude Awakening e-mail subscription and associated external offers sent from Rude Awakening, feel free to [unsubscribe](. Please read our [Privacy Statement.]( If you are you having trouble receiving your Rude Awakening subscription, you can ensure its arrival in your mailbox by [whitelisting us.]( © 2021 Paradigm Press, LLC. 808 Saint Paul Street, Baltimore MD 21202. Although our employees may answer your general customer service questions, they are not licensed under securities laws to address your particular investment situation. No communication by our employees to you should be deemed as personalized financial advice. We expressly forbid our writers from having a financial interest in any security they personally recommend to our readers. All of our employees and agents must wait 24 hours after on-line publication or 72 hours after the mailing of a printed-only publication prior to following an initial recommendation. Any investments recommended in this letter should be made only after consulting with your investment advisor and only after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company. Email Reference ID: 470SJNED01

EDM Keywords (222)

year writers would worthy worth world women woman wish wife well way wanted use unsubscribe ultimate typed try trumpets took title titan time think thank tell tax take synagogues submitting subject styled streets stories space sorts someone solutions snark shut share settled sees seen seed security secret said rude role righteousness right riches rich reward reviewing revealing respecting respect rent received receive really readers raised protecting prospectus proportion profited profit privacy printed practice potential portion popular piece people pen past part others one often noise newsweek needy need name much money minute mind may married marriage manifest makes make mailing mailbox made lying lost longer lived licensed letter let leads know knew kept keep interest intensely industry included inability implemented idea iconic hypocrites honored honor hey help head hands grateful governed giving give girl get gal fun front founding forwarded fortune following flee feel father far even ensure end emulation employees else effort easy earn dream done divorced divisions distortion disperse discrimination design deserves deserts derision deemed decided day daughter curtain created create crash court couple could consulting consent confirm concentrated company communication committed come click claiming choice ceo center cash careful career capital calls called call building builders bring branched boy bits bit billionaire better back away award average available author arrival announcing announce amazon advertisements admiring admiration address accept 90 2008

Marketing emails from paradigm.press

View More
Sent On

15/03/2023

Sent On

15/03/2023

Sent On

15/03/2023

Sent On

14/03/2023

Sent On

14/03/2023

Sent On

14/03/2023

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.