Newsletter Subject

A Global Minimum Corporate Tax is Evil

From

paradigm.press

Email Address

RudeAwakening@email.paradigm-press.net

Sent On

Mon, Jun 7, 2021 10:00 AM

Email Preheader Text

A tax so stupid it has to be implemented worldwide without legislation. A Global Minimum Corporate T

A tax so stupid it has to be implemented worldwide without legislation. [Unsubscribe]( [Image](https://) A Global Minimum Corporate Tax is Evil - The G7 wants to implement a global minimum corporate tax. - Labor shoulders most of the tax increase. - The G7 are also the most indebted nations in the world. Funny, that. Recommended Link [The Constitution is set to cause an explosion in Gold…]( [Click here for more...]( Are you aware of the constitutional amendment set to cause an explosion in the gold market? If not, then I urge you to see my [latest video]( where I detail what I predicted to happen within the first six months of atheBiden presidency… This may be your only chance to take advantage of what I detail [right here…]( [Get A Copy Of My Special Report]( Sean Ring Editor, Rude Awakening Happy Monday! I hope you had a fabulous weekend. Let’s get straight into the macro governmental stupidity known as worldwide tax. The Opening Salvo Every time I think, “These bureaucrats can’t possibly get more diluted,” they come up with an even more idiotic plan than before. Lo and behold! The G7 has agreed to impose a Global Minimum Corporate Tax. Unfortunately, the entire working world will have to suffer this tax if these Insufferables get their way. Here comes the global cavalry to somehow, someway, plug the supposed holes in the financial system. Let’s Review When it comes to tax, the proper verb is “suffer.” You do not pay tax. You suffer tax. Here’s what I wrote about corporate tax in one of my earliest Rudes: And aren’t people who think that companies pay corporate tax the cutest little things? I just want to pat them on their heads and send them back to the sandbox. Shareholders, customers, and employees suffer (the correct verb) corporate tax. “Companies” don’t pay anything. Ultimately, a real, live person suffers tax. Later in that piece, I followed with: Let it be known: no legislation that targets “the rich” ever hits the rich. Because the rich are rich for a reason. And I’ll spell it out right now: Legal tax avoidance is an integral part of getting rich. Notice I didn’t write “evading tax.” And this insidious tax won’t hit its intended target, either, as we’ll see later. And for our last bit of review: But I do try to emulate the wonderful author Charles Adams, whose For Good and Evil: The Impact of Taxes on Civilization is required reading. Alvin Rabushka, in his foreword to the book, summarizes what Adams elucidates in his book. He shows: - - Good tax systems go bad unless citizens restrain the government. - Civilization tends to destruct from bad taxation. - Moderation is an important principle in the design and implementation of tax systems. Moderation, in this case, includes the choice of tax rates, the penalties for evasion, the intrusiveness of tax collection, and the need to treat taxpayers equally by avoiding excess progressivity or regressivity. Ok, let’s get to the recent story on “tax harmonization.” What Are “They” Doing This Time? They - the G7 - are doing nothing less than mandating a worldwide minimum corporate tax. Who’s the G7? The G7 is an informal club consisting of the wealthiest democracies in the world, which includes the US, the UK, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, and Japan. Russia was booted out of the then-G8 in 2014 over the Crimea affair. They hold so much sway because these countries have 58% of the world’s wealth (and the American, British, and French nuclear arsenals). Why are the G7 doing trying to institute a global minimum corporate tax? The real reason is that global tech companies shift their profits around to the lowest tax jurisdiction. This is entirely legal, moral, and ethical. No rule says, “Pay the maximum amount of tax you can.” It’s antithetical to freedom. The more power The State has, the less power private entities have. “But Sean, Zuck, @jack, and Bezos don’t pay nearly the tax they should!” To which I’d reply, “How much more would you like to pay for your Amazon goods? How much do you pay to show off for your friends on Facebook now? How much does it cost per tweet?” I’d also say, “Socialists often use the word ‘should.’ With ideas are this bad, they need to be enforced at gunpoint.” When asked about how a higher corporate tax would make companies increase their prices to pay for it, White House Press Secretary Jen “Circle Back” Psaki said, “(Joe Biden) also believes that the American people are smart. They’re invested in this. They’re going to pay attention and that they know that corporations do not need to raise the cost of goods in order to pay more taxes and pay more of their fair share.” Her economic illiteracy is both staggering and alarming. Or she’s just lying. [Matt Palumbo nicely summarized]( the studies that say labor bears most - yes, most corporate tax increase. (Those hyperlinks go directly to the studies if you fancy reading through them.) - A review of the academic literature on the corporate tax conducted by the [U.S Department of the Treasury]( found that “labor may bear a substantial portion of the burden from the corporate income tax.” - Economist Arnold C. Harberger, known for authoring a seminal paper on the effects of the [corporate income tax rate]( on international trade, has found that labor bears over 80% of the corporate tax. - According to [Oxford University economist]( Li Liu and Rutgers economist Rosanne Altshuler, for every $1 increase in corporate tax revenue, wages decrease by 60 cents. - Wiji Arulampalam, Michael P. Devereux, and Giorgia Maffini of [Oxford University]( found that $1 in additional corporate tax reduces wages by 92 cents in the long run. - According to economist [Alison Fenix]( “a one percentage point increase in the marginal corporate tax rate decreases annual wages by 0.7 percent.” Recommended Link [Check Your Cell Phone ASAP]( [Click here for more...]( Blindsided: Why 205 Million Americans Just Got This Nasty Update on Their Phones. Smartphones carried by 205 million Americans have recently been automatically updated with a feature that would make most Americans uncomfortable. Your smartphone probably already has the feature, and if you knew what this update did, you might be furious. [Click Here To See Why]( And in the “It’s Never Too Early to Pat Oneself on the Back” file: What is she talking about? Not only is the former Fed Governor, but she also has a Ph.D. in Economics and is married to a Nobel Laureate in Economics. For crying out loud, she should know this stuff! Of course, a race to the bottom - or 0.00% corporate tax - is what we need! The only benefit for the middle class and working people - we know who you mean, Janet (wink, wink) - will be more expensive goods and services… and lower wages. You said it, Murray! How can governments possibly justify an increase in corporate tax - worldwide - when the adverse effects are well known? Easy. Blame the Boogie Man. In this case, it’s Big Tech. Now please don’t mistake my loathing of corporate tax harmonization with a defense of Big Tech. On the whole, they’re a reprehensible lot. But two things worry me: the first is mission creep. The second is the collapse of low tax economies. Before I get into those, let me say that tax havens will always exist. They always have, and they always will. This is a poor attempt to defeat them. As I’ve written before, The State never hits its intended target. So let’s look at mission creep. The tax they’ve floated targets large companies with a 10% profit margin. Of course, the more naive of us will say, “Great! Small companies are safe.” No. Sooner or later, the governments will simply modify the law to include smaller companies. And that will destroy entrepreneurship and small businesses. For the second, the low tax economies I worry about are places like Ireland. Though I haven’t been for years, Ireland is a delightful place. It also rains 300 days per year. It’s the type of place that needs low tax to attract talent to move there and work there. If Ireland - which fiercely opposes this plan - was forced to raise its corporate tax rate from 12.5 % to 15%, the implications are big. And remember going from 12.5% to 15% is not a 2.5% increase. It’s a 20% increase (2.5% / 12.5% = 20%). How can this be stopped? We must depend on two different groups in two different places. First, the Republicans in Congress must oppose this move. They probably will fight it because making the first move here is dangerous. If US corporate tax goes up before everyone else’s does, companies may move out and threaten an already fragile recovery. Second, we must rely on Ireland, Hungary, Luxembourg, and a host of European countries whose economies depend on low taxation. The EU must have a unanimous vote to pass this legislation. I doubt that will happen. But you never know what the outlandishly profligate Western European countries will hold over their heads to get this legislation through. I also hope the “tax havens” get vocal, as this whole idea is conceived to reduce the spots where corporations can “vote with their feet” when idiotic governments pass dreadful tax legislation. Down with tax cooperation! Here’s to tax competition! Have a great week ahead. All the best, Sean Ring Editor, Rude Awakening Recommended Link [These Ticking Time Bombs could Kill a Post-Pandemic Recovery]( [Click here for more...]( A former hedge fund manager and respected economist wants to give you a [stark warning.]( According to him, there are no fewer than three ticking time bombs that could derail Joe Biden's highly popular "rescue plan" for America. It's not the message the media wants you to hear. It's not what Joe Biden wants you to believe. But you need to hear it... [Click Here To Learn More]( [Whitelist Us]( | [Archive]( | [Privacy Policy]( | [Unsubscribe]( Rude Awakening is committed to protecting and respecting your privacy. We do not rent or share your email address. By submitting your email address, you consent to Paradigm Press delivering daily email issues and advertisements. To end your Rude Awakening e-mail subscription and associated external offers sent from Rude Awakening, feel free to [unsubscribe](. Please read our [Privacy Statement.]( If you are you having trouble receiving your Rude Awakening subscription, you can ensure its arrival in your mailbox by [whitelisting us.]( © 2021 Paradigm Press, LLC. 808 Saint Paul Street, Baltimore MD 21202. Although our employees may answer your general customer service questions, they are not licensed under securities laws to address your particular investment situation. No communication by our employees to you should be deemed as personalized financial advice. We expressly forbid our writers from having a financial interest in any security they personally recommend to our readers. All of our employees and agents must wait 24 hours after on-line publication or 72 hours after the mailing of a printed-only publication prior to following an initial recommendation. Any investments recommended in this letter should be made only after consulting with your investment advisor and only after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company. Email Reference ID: 470SJNED01

EDM Keywords (229)

yes wrote written writers would worry world work word whole wealth way want vote us urge update type trying try time threaten think taxes tax targets talking suffer submitting stupid stuff studies stopped state staggering spots spell sooner smart show share set services send see security second say said safe right rich reviewing review respecting republicans reply rent reduce recently reason readers raise race protecting prospectus probably privacy printed prices predicted power please plan place piece ph people penalties pay pat pass order one never need naive murray much move mistake might message may married mandating making mailing mailbox made loud look loathing lo like licensed letter let legislation learn law later known know knew ireland invested intrusiveness institute increase includes impose implications implementation implement impact ideas host hope hold hit hear heads happen gunpoint governments got goods good going give get g8 g7 friends freedom found foreword forced following followed first fight fewer feet feature facebook explosion evil even evasion ethical ensure enforced end emulate employees effects economics early doubt diluted detail destruct design department defense defeat deemed dangerous crying course countries cost corporations copy consulting constitution consent conceived communication committed comes come collapse click civilization choice chance cause case bureaucrats burden bottom booted book blindsided big bezos benefit believe behold bad back aware authoring asked arrival antithetical america always also alarming agreed advertisements address 80 58 2014 15

Marketing emails from paradigm.press

View More
Sent On

15/03/2023

Sent On

15/03/2023

Sent On

15/03/2023

Sent On

14/03/2023

Sent On

14/03/2023

Sent On

14/03/2023

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.