Newsletter Subject

ICYMI: The Day It All Began

From

ozy.com

Email Address

info@daily.ozy.com

Sent On

Sun, Sep 12, 2021 07:31 PM

Email Preheader Text

www.ozy.com This special edition shares a look back at the horrific attacks of 9/11. Sep 12, 2021 TO

www.ozy.com [OZY]() This special edition shares a look back at the horrific attacks of 9/11. Sep 12, 2021 TODAY John McLaughlin, deputy director and acting director of the CIA from 2000 to 2004, teaches at the Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies. He reflects here on the fateful events of 9/11. It was about 10 p.m. when I finally turned to my computer to write. I was on the seventh floor at CIA headquarters, where I had been serving as deputy director for 14 months. I typed a single sentence, a memo to myself: “Nothing will ever be the same.” Vivid Recollection Sept. 11, 2001, was by any measure the most eventful day of my brief tenure. In my memory, that day is a [blur]( of emergency work, and the rest of that week could easily comprise a book. But some memories, personal and professional, remain vivid. The hijacked planes hit the twin towers at 8:46 and 9:03 a.m. and the Pentagon at 9:37. Around 10 a.m., we moved out of our headquarters, in Langley, Virginia, to an adjacent structure; we assumed that our building was also a target. The only officers left behind, until we returned early that afternoon, were those of our Counterterrorism Center; they continued to monitor incoming reporting on the situation. Our initial reaction to the attacks was basically, “So that’s it.” All summer long, we had been monitoring an upsurge in threat reporting, anticipating an attack and seeking to thwart it. We had warned of the growing danger both in public testimony and in private meetings at the White House. But we did not have hard intelligence on the specific timing, target or methodology of the attack. So while we were surprised by specific events of the day, we were not surprised that an attack had finally occurred. Within about two hours, we confirmed that al-Qaida was the attacker. One of our analysts had burst into our temporary office with a copy of the manifest from the aircraft that hit the Pentagon, and we recognized two names — Khalid al-Mihdhar and Nawaf al-Hazmi — as people we had been tracking overseas and knew to be al-Qaida. Behind the Scenes All parts of the national security apparatus were scrambling to grasp what had happened and to keep the government on an even keel. Much of this is well-documented publicly — the White House bunker, confusion over whether our military should shoot down any unidentified aircraft, the president’s address that evening. Behind the scenes, we were doing what is always the first task in any national security emergency — developing an accurate picture of what is happening and what might happen next. I recall at least one closed-circuit secure video with the president around 3 o’clock that afternoon. Officials from the White House, the Department of Defense and the Department of State were also on the screen. Everyone laid out what they knew and what they thought. I recall the president’s reaction: “Start rallying a coalition against terrorism — we will find them and destroy them.” Naturally, Congress was clamoring for information. The next day, Wednesday, the White House sent me to Capitol Hill along with the FBI director and several other officials. We appeared in the well of the House of Representatives to brief any member of Congress who wanted to attend; the House was nearly full. At that moment, reports were coming in so fast that anything said in a briefing would be subject to revision within minutes or hours, so I kept it simple: Here’s what we know, here’s who we think was responsible, here’s what we worry about next. This was well received and Congress invited me to return the next day with an update. At this point, we could not rule out further attacks. A congressman asked if the Capitol itself could be a target. At the precise moment I said yes, an alarm sounded and there was a stampede to get out of the House — emblematic of the atmosphere in those days. I never did learn why the alarm went off. History in the Making By then, we knew the president wanted the national security team to meet at Camp David on Saturday, and we were working hard on an assessment of the situation and an aggressive counterterrorism plan. By the time CIA Director George Tenet, counterterrorism chief Cofer Black and I got to Camp David early Saturday morning, we were prepared with a plan for attacking al-Qaida in dozens of countries around the world. The president listened to our plan, along with proposals from the Defense Department and other agencies, and told us all to show up in the Cabinet Room at the White House on Monday. When we arrived Monday, the president crisply issued about a dozen orders, parceling out duties to each department. Among other things, he was ready to deploy forces to Afghanistan to take on al-Qaida and the Taliban. Referring to our plan, he said he expected the CIA to be the “first in.” With that charge, we rapidly pulled together two teams and inserted them into northern Afghanistan, where they hit the ground just 15 days after the 9/11 attacks. They linked up with the Northern Alliance, Afghan foes of the Taliban with whom we had maintained close ties for a number of years. Working with our Afghan allies, the CIA teams began collecting intelligence and preparing the way for the arrival shortly thereafter of U.S. Army Special Forces. By November, Kabul fell to the U.S. effort — and, as they say, the rest is history. The subsequent months and years brought dramatic changes to the CIA: new resources, new authorities, a closer integration with the U.S. military and an entire generation of officers socialized in war. It also brought new dangers. When an officer is killed in the line of duty, the CIA carves a star in the marble wall of its headquarters lobby. There are more than 130 stars; over a third of them have been carved since 9/11. So the sentence I wrote on that chaotic night 20 years ago may be the most prescient thing I’ve ever written. Since Sept. 11, 2001, nothing has been the same — for the CIA or for the United States. More on OZY [Follow OZY on Twitter]( If you’re looking for a way to stay up-to-date with everything #OZY — from podcasts and TV to interviews with the biggest and boldest celebrities of tomorrow — follow us on Twitter! You won’t regret it. [Follow Us on Twitter]( ABOUT OZY OZY is a diverse, global and forward-looking media and entertainment company focused on “the New and the Next.” OZY creates space for fresh perspectives and offers new takes on everything from news and culture to technology, business, learning and entertainment. [www.ozy.com]( / #CarlosWatson / #OZY Welcome to the New + the Next! [OZY]() [TV]( | [PODCASTS]( | [NEWS]( | [FESTIVALS]( A Modern Media Company OZY Media, 800 West El Camino Mountain View, California 94040 This email was sent to {EMAIL} [Manage Subscriptions]( | [Privacy Policy]( | [Read Online](

Marketing emails from ozy.com

View More
Sent On

28/02/2023

Sent On

28/02/2023

Sent On

27/02/2023

Sent On

27/02/2023

Sent On

26/02/2023

Sent On

26/02/2023

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.