Newsletter Subject

Beware of This Terrifying Butterfly

From

oxfordclub.com

Email Address

oxford@mb.oxfordclub.com

Sent On

Sat, Apr 3, 2021 12:48 PM

Email Preheader Text

A minor downgrade led to a market sell-off... SPECIAL OPPORTUNITIES Beware of This Terrifying Butter

A minor downgrade led to a market sell-off... SPECIAL OPPORTUNITIES [The Oxford Club Special Opportunities]( Beware of This Terrifying Butterfly Matt Benjamin, Senior Markets Expert, The Oxford Club [Matt Benajmin] Perhaps you're familiar with the butterfly effect. For those of you who are a bit hazy on this term, it originated in an obscure branch of mathematics called chaos theory. And it refers to the fact that in a system with many sensitive interdependencies, a tiny change in one place can lead to major repercussions elsewhere. The name of the effect comes from the idea that a butterfly flapping its wings in Brazil could eventually set off a tornado in Texas. As the metaphor suggests, this can create a scary state of affairs. Well, some recent events suggest we may have achieved just that state in the financial markets. Minor Downgrade to Huge Sell-Off Here's the story in a nutshell. On March 26, a Wells Fargo (NYSE: WFC) analyst downgraded his outlooks for ViacomCBS (Nasdaq: VIAC) and Discovery Inc. (Nasdaq: DISCA). His reasoning for the downgrades was specific to the industry: Those two media companies will face increasingly tough competition in the streaming space from behemoths such as The Walt Disney Company (NYSE: DIS) and Amazon (Nasdaq: AMZN). It seems reasonable. And, predictably, the downgrade triggered sharp sell-offs in those stocks (they were already trending downward). Both of the downgraded companies tumbled around 27% last Friday. Unless your portfolio was overweight in those stocks, there was nothing much to worry about... Except for the terrifying butterfly effect. A large hedge fund called Archegos Capital Management had built up a significant position in both Viacom and Discovery. The fund, which had borrowed heavily from its brokers to buy stocks, suddenly saw these lenders concerned about the loans. The lenders demanded cash to cover any potential losses stemming from the Viacom drop in particular (those demands are called margin calls). To cover those margin calls, Archegos liquidated some $20 billion of its stock portfolios on March 26. And potential losses at Archegos also did real damage to the stocks of Nomura Holdings (NYSE: NMR), Japan's largest investment bank, and Swiss giant Credit Suisse (NYSE: CS) - both of which had lent money to Archegos. The two banks are now warning of major losses this year. Finally, all the mass selling and warnings of losses triggered a sell-off in Asia over last weekend, which spread to U.S. markets Monday morning, as investors panicked about fears of contagion. To be fair, the sell-off in U.S. markets was not steep, and stocks rebounded in afternoon trading. Call it more of a thunderstorm in Texas than a tornado. But the butterfly effect was there for all to see. An analyst's downgrade that was focused solely on the streaming industry resulted in major market sell-offs around the globe. So Who's to Blame? So what's brought us to this delicate state where minor decisions one place can lead to major effects elsewhere? It's liquidity. There's just too much of it. With central banks printing money hand over fist, too many market participants are borrowing enormous amounts of it to invest. These investors become overleveraged. And when something goes wrong, things can go from bad to terrible in an instant. In addition, all that money sloshing around is driving stock valuations through the roof. According to Gavekal Research, due to an abundance of central-bank-generated liquidity, nasty local liquidity squeezes are popping up everywhere. "Liquidity is a coward," according to Gavekal. "As soon as a fight starts, he disappears." This will continue to be the case until central banks move away from zero interest rates and stock valuations come back to earth. So cautious investors will want to be prudent in their own borrowing and look for stocks with more reasonable price tags, namely value stocks. Investors, proceed accordingly! On an unrelated (or maybe slightly related) note, the Ever Given - the 400-meter cargo ship that ran aground in the Suez Canal on March 23 and created a massive global traffic jam of hundreds of ships, halting billions of dollars in trade - is finally moving again. Maybe, just maybe, this will be the kind of butterfly that creates a few sunny days in markets instead of a tornado... Enjoy your weekend and stay safe, Matt P.S. Are you interested in great opportunities in value stocks? How about the tiny $4 tech stock with the technology that could replace smartphones? Chief Investment Strategist Alexander Green has just the right service for you. [Click here to learn more about Oxford Microcap Trader.]( SPONSORED [Blue Chips Take Forever... Microcaps Could Be Your Path to Riches]( Most people don't know... Netflix once traded for $2. Apple stock was only $1! Back when they were this cheap... few investors knew about them. This expert bought BOTH... and now he's found the best microcap in the world at $4 a share. [CLICK HERE for details.]( [The Oxford Club] You are receiving this email because you subscribed to Oxford Club Special Opportunities. Oxford Club Special Opportunities is published by The Oxford Club. Questions? Check out our [FAQs](. Trying to reach us? [Contact us here.]( Please do not reply to this email as it goes to an unmonitored inbox. [Privacy Policy]( | [Whitelist Oxford Club Special Opportunities]( | [Unsubscribe]( © 2021 The Oxford Club, LLC All Rights Reserved The Oxford Club | [105 West Monument Street](#) | [Baltimore, MD 21201](#) North America: [1.800.589.3430](#) | International: [+1.443.353.4334](#) | Fax: [1.410.329.1923](#) [Oxfordclub.com]( Your Legal Questions... Answered What is The Oxford Club? The Oxford Club is a financial publisher with a highly rated track record. We deliver unique and well-researched financial and investment ideas to our Members. What do you do? We share our team of experts' industry knowledge and timely insights with our Members so they have the financial literacy and tools needed to build a rich, fulfilling life. We do not provide any personalized financial advice or advocate the purchase or sale of any security or investment for any specific individual. Instead, the information we share is directed toward a larger audience of all subscribed Members. So you'll make me rich? Maybe! But not exactly. Our goal is to provide the research and information required to help you make you rich. Investment markets have inherent risks, and we can't guarantee future profits. Why should I trust you? We offer information based on what we think will provide the most value to our Members. Our business depends on Members' interest in our ideas and satisfaction with their results. We've been around for 30-plus years because our Members have continually chosen to stay with us (many of them for life). We expressly forbid our writers from having a financial interest in their own securities recommendations to readers. All of our employees and agents must wait 24 hours after online publication or 72 hours after the mailing of printed-only publications before following an initial recommendation. So I can fire my investment advisor? No! Any investments recommended by The Oxford Club should be made only after consulting with your investment advisor and only after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

Marketing emails from oxfordclub.com

View More
Sent On

31/05/2024

Sent On

30/05/2024

Sent On

29/05/2024

Sent On

28/05/2024

Sent On

27/05/2024

Sent On

26/05/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2024 SimilarMail.