Outsider Question of the Week, July 26

Your questions answered! You are receiving this email because you subscribed to Outsider Club. [Click here]( to manage your e-mail preferences. [Outsider Club logo] By Outsider Club Written Jul. 26, 2019 Outsider Club's Weekly Reader Question "Does it worry you there is 100% consensus the Fed will cut rates?"— Daryl J. --------------------------------------------------------------- NICK HODGE | Founder As a contrarian, yes. It always makes me nervous when there's total agreement. The oft-cited CME Fedwatch Tool now has a 100% probability there will be a rate cut at the FOMC meeting on July 31. Is this the inevitable conclusion of its decade-long show? I'd have to say so, though I don't know how long the act is or if there will be an encore. And I indicated this much in my editorial to you this week, telling you I've begun trading in some of my longer-term index funds for cash. Not to be confused with the Chicken Schiffles of the world, I haven't done any selling of retirement funds in my IRA in 10 years. There is rotation afoot, as we've been saying in these pages. Rate cut or not... the endgame is clear. A monetary reset event approaches. We're just waiting for the Fed to take its bow. --------------------------------------------------------------- [jason_simpkins_250x285]JASON SIMPKINS | Editor Yes. I've been pretty vocal about this. Unemployment is the lowest it's been in decades, the economy is growing, and inflation is right near 2%, which I've been told is the Fed's "preferred target." Furthermore, as I understand the central bank's dual mandate, it's to promote employment and manage inflation. I understand there are some economic indicators pointing toward recession. I understand that President Trump's tariff policies are negatively impacting the economy. And I understand that there's still a lot of weakness abroad. But to me, that still doesn't require a rate cut. It's not the Fed's job to ensure that the market goes up in perpetuity. Nor is it the Fed's job to manage the economy. This isn't China. We have a free market that's supposed to sort itself out. We don't need a stable of unelected bureaucrats to micromanage growth. The government is responsible for growth. It's supposed to enable it with sound economic policy, sensible regulation, and a balanced budget. It's NOT supposed to go crying to the Fed every time the market starts to quake. Recessions and market dives, though unpleasant, are necessary. They weed out weakness. They establish boundaries for policy. And they expose flaws worthy of remedy. Try as we might, we're never going to live in a world without them. To the contrary, by delaying the inevitable and kicking the can down the road, we're actually sowing the seeds for a much more painful crisis. And when that crisis comes, what tools will the Fed deploy to address it, having already exhausted its chief means of economic management? I worry that this decade-long bull market birthed by generous Fed policy has created a "new normal" in which the central bank is called into action at any hint of trouble. It's a mentality that's distorting the very markets it seeks to save and breeding complacency. So, yes, it worries me. --------------------------------------------------------------- [adam_english_2018_250x285]ADAM ENGLISH | Editor If it truly just meant 100% for a single rate cut it wouldn't worry me. Instead it is 100% that the Fed will continue to do exactly what the market wants. Even at all-time highs and sky-high valuations, the threat of a cyclical, almost natural slowdown has become an "all hands on deck" emergency. As has been predicted for years, the Fed has not returned to anything close to a normal and healthy higher interest rate in spite of having a decade between rate cuts to do so. There is precious little cushion for when an actual recession happens, let alone an economic emergency. So, 100% sure of one rate cut? Not a big worry. Everything that comes with it? How the Fed will likely be expected to go further or the markets will flip out. How the Fed is still sitting on trillions of debt. How it has few tools in its toolbox to fix anything that's actually broken. How absolutely vulnerable we are because of it. All of those come alongside that 100% consensus, and it is a scary list. --------------------------------------------------------------- To [learn more about our editors](, visit our website. And keep an eye on your inbox for Adam's (Tuesdays), Nick's (Wednesdays), and Jason's (Fridays) weekly articles. Submit a Question for the Outsider Club If you would like to ask a question of our editors, simply hit 'reply' to this email. Keep an eye out for future issues to see if your question has been chosen. Please note that not all questions will be selected, and due to the large volume of email we receive, it is unfortunately not possible to respond directly to those emails not selected. Enjoy reading this article? [Click here]( to like it and receive similar articles to read! Browse Our Archives [The Fed Can’t Save You]( [Why I Do This]( [Why I Moved Some Retirement Funds to Cash]( [Who Will Become Today's Barons?]( [The Shift Is Underway]( --------------------------------------------------------------- This email was sent to {EMAIL}. It is not our intention to send email to anyone who doesn't want it. If you're not sure why you've received this e-letter, or no longer wish to receive it, you may [unsubscribe here](, and view our privacy policy and information on how to manage your subscription. To ensure that you receive future issues of Outsider Club, please add newsletter@outsiderclub.com to your address book or whitelist within your spam settings. For customer service questions or issues, please contact us for assistance. [Outsider Club](, Copyright © 2019, [Angel Publishing LLC]( & Outsider Club LLC, 111 Market Place #720, Baltimore, MD 21202. For Customer Service, please call (877) 303-4529. All rights reserved. [View our privacy policy here.]( No statement or expression of opinion, or any other matter herein, directly or indirectly, is an offer or the solicitation of an offer to buy or sell the securities or financial instruments mentioned. Angel Publishing and Outsider Club does not provide individual investment counseling, act as an investment advisor, or individually advocate the purchase or sale of any security or investment. Subscribers should not view this publication as offering personalized legal or investment counseling. Investments recommended in this publication should be made only after consulting with your investment advisor and only after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company in question. This letter is not intended to meet your specific individual investment needs and it is not tailored to your personal financial situation. Nothing contained herein constitutes, is intended, or deemed to be – either implied or otherwise – investment advice. Neither the publisher nor the editors are registered investment advisors. This letter reflects the personal views and opinions of Nick Hodge and that is all it purports to be. While the information herein is believed to be accurate and reliable it is not guaranteed or implied to be so. Neither Nick Hodge, nor anyone else, accepts any responsibility, or assumes any liability, whatsoever, for any direct, indirect or consequential loss arising from the use of the information in this letter. The information contained herein is subject to change without notice, may become outdated and may not be updated. Nick Hodge, entities that he controls, family, friends, employees, associates, and others may have positions in securities mentioned, or discussed, in this letter. No part of this letter/article may be reproduced, copied, emailed, faxed, or distributed (in any form) without the express written permission of Nick Hodge or the Outsider Club. Unauthorized reproduction of this newsletter or its contents by Xerography, facsimile, or any other means is illegal and punishable by law.