Nuclear Meltdown or Opportunity?

This is a simple story. The utilities need uranium. They will pay much higher prices because current prices are below the cost of production and because the price they pay is a small input in the overall equation. You are receiving this email because you subscribed to Outsider Club. [Click here]( to manage your e-mail preferences. [Outsider Club logo] Nuclear Meltdown or Opportunity? [Gerardo Del Real Photo] By [Gerardo Del Real]( Written Jul. 15, 2019 The long-awaited Section 232 decision by President Trump was announced over the weekend. The petition was filed by Ur-Energy and Energy Fuels and was meant to seek relief for U.S.-based uranium miners. Most analysts expected some form of relief in the form of purchase quotas that would help revitalize U.S. uranium production. The President stated that he does not concur with the DoC conclusion that uranium imports “threaten to impair national security." As always, the details matter. [Unusual Pattern Detects World’s Largest Gold Mines]( Every single historic gold discovery shares one single unusual trait. It’s a geological pattern that pinpoints where the largest amounts of gold are located. Even better, it’s the key to generating consistent 10-baggers like 2,800%, 2,252%, and 1,300%. [Click here for the full story.]( Trump does believe that the United States' uranium industry faces significant challenges in producing uranium domestically and that this is an issue of national security. Trump agreed that the DoC’s findings “raise significant concerns regarding the impact of uranium imports on the national security with respect to domestic mining,” and ordered the “fuller analysis of national security considerations with respect to the entire nuclear fuel supply chain.” The decision went on to highlight that further examination of the entire nuclear fuel supply chain is required. Trump has ordered a new 90-day review by a group of Federal agencies — The Nuclear Fuel Working Group. This group will be chaired by U.S. National Security Advisor John Bolton and U.S. National Economic Council Director Larry Kudlow. It will "develop recommendations for reviving and expanding domestic nuclear fuel production." The group is tasked with ensuring a complete review and reinvigoration of the United States' nuclear fuel supply chain, consistent with the United States' national security and nonproliferation goals. While the decision was not the catalyst that many hoped for, it does provide clarity to the utilities and it is not a coincidence that the uranium spot price is up on the news. The decision was highly anticipated because of the clarity it would provide moving forward. [Billionaire backs tiny stock set to potentially double this month]( The greatest investor in the mining space just plunked down a huge stake in a small copper company in South America. My three-‘commandment’ trading strategy has identified it as a potential 80-100% play this month. [Click here to see how to invest.]( Yes, a positive decision that benefited the U.S. companies would've provided a boost to those companies, but the catalyst has always been the clarity that a decision would provide, which will allow the utilities a clear investment landscape. Utilities have sat out talks for long-term contracts until a decision was made. The utilities are the largest consumer and, as I said before, are the spark that will light the uranium bull market fire. Uranium companies with U.S. exposure shed between 25%-40% of their market caps. That sell-off was overdone and provides an opportunity. Why? The math. Domestic uranium production in the U.S. has declined by ~90% since peaking in 1980 at ~43M lbs U3O8 (source: EIA), and now accounts for ~2% of the country’s consumption (estimated 2018), compared to 49% in 1987. The remainder of U.S. uranium requirements are filled by imports from Canada (~25%), Kazakhstan (~24%), Australia (~20%), and Russia (~14%) to support the 97 nuclear reactors that produce 20% of the country’s electricity. [The Original “Goldbug” Says Gold’s Biggest Moment is... RIGHT NOW]( [goldbug_book_190x190]Stock-picking legend Mr. Dines was the original “goldbug” to make a killing on gold in the 1960s, when it was just $35 an ounce! His timing was so perfect that New York magazine went so far as to put him on the cover. But Mr. Dines wasn’t done. He made another fortune on gold in the 70s. And then again in the 80s. And yes, in the 90s. And he also made outrageous gains on gold in the 2000s... Mr. Dines believes that gold’s history isn’t finished. In fact, Mr. Dines says that NOW is going to be gold’s biggest moment ever, and that we’re on the verge of a historic gold spike. Hard to believe? Perhaps. But I wouldn’t bet against Mr. Dines... l[et me show you why a never-before-seen spike in gold is “all but certain.”]( So, who’s filling the void? Uranium deliveries from state-owned companies in Russia, Kazakhstan, and Uzbekistan increased 16% from 2017 to 2018, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration. These countries provided 44% of the uranium imported to the U.S. last year. Meanwhile, U.S. mines produced 37% less uranium from 2017 to 2018, reaching a record low. Deliveries from Canada and Australia declined 25% during that same time frame. This is a simple story. The utilities need uranium. They will pay much higher prices because current prices are below the cost of production and because the price they pay is a small input in the overall equation. Companies that can supply the uranium will do very well. The end. To your wealth, [gerardo-sig] Gerardo Del Real Editor, [Junior Mining Monthly]( and [Junior Mining Trader](. For the past decade, Gerardo Del Real has worked behind-the-scenes providing research, due diligence and advice to large institutional players, fund managers, newsletter writers and some of the most active high net worth investors in the resource space. Now, he is bringing his extensive experience to the public through [Outsider Club](, [Junior Mining Monthly](, and [Junior Mining Trader](. For more about Gerardo, check out his [editor page](. *Follow Outsider Club on [Facebook]( and [Twitter](. Enjoy reading this article? [Click here]( to like it and receive similar articles to read! Browse Our Archives [Mr. Dines: Add To Your Gold Positions Now]( [Cannabis and Cancer]( [There’s Still Time to Profit From This Trump Action]( [James Dines on New Gold Bull Market: "This Is It"]( [The Other Fight For Dominance With China]( --------------------------------------------------------------- This email was sent to {EMAIL}. It is not our intention to send email to anyone who doesn't want it. If you're not sure why you've received this e-letter, or no longer wish to receive it, you may [unsubscribe here](, and view our privacy policy and information on how to manage your subscription. To ensure that you receive future issues of Outsider Club, please add newsletter@outsiderclub.com to your address book or whitelist within your spam settings. For customer service questions or issues, please contact us for assistance. [Outsider Club](, Copyright © 2019, [Angel Publishing LLC]( & Outsider Club LLC, 111 Market Place #720, Baltimore, MD 21202. For Customer Service, please call (877) 303-4529. All rights reserved. [View our privacy policy here.]( No statement or expression of opinion, or any other matter herein, directly or indirectly, is an offer or the solicitation of an offer to buy or sell the securities or financial instruments mentioned. Angel Publishing and Outsider Club does not provide individual investment counseling, act as an investment advisor, or individually advocate the purchase or sale of any security or investment. Subscribers should not view this publication as offering personalized legal or investment counseling. Investments recommended in this publication should be made only after consulting with your investment advisor and only after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company in question. This letter is not intended to meet your specific individual investment needs and it is not tailored to your personal financial situation. Nothing contained herein constitutes, is intended, or deemed to be – either implied or otherwise – investment advice. Neither the publisher nor the editors are registered investment advisors. This letter reflects the personal views and opinions of Nick Hodge and that is all it purports to be. While the information herein is believed to be accurate and reliable it is not guaranteed or implied to be so. Neither Nick Hodge, nor anyone else, accepts any responsibility, or assumes any liability, whatsoever, for any direct, indirect or consequential loss arising from the use of the information in this letter. The information contained herein is subject to change without notice, may become outdated and may not be updated. Nick Hodge, entities that he controls, family, friends, employees, associates, and others may have positions in securities mentioned, or discussed, in this letter. No part of this letter/article may be reproduced, copied, emailed, faxed, or distributed (in any form) without the express written permission of Nick Hodge or the Outsider Club. Unauthorized reproduction of this newsletter or its contents by Xerography, facsimile, or any other means is illegal and punishable by law.