Newsletter Subject

The Big AI Lie

From

outsiderclub.com

Email Address

newsletter@e.outsiderclub.com

Sent On

Wed, Jul 24, 2024 07:21 PM

Email Preheader Text

The big lie with AI is that there is a return on the investment Jul 24, 2024 | By Briton Ryle The

The big lie with AI is that there is a return on the investment [outsider club logo header] Jul 24, 2024 | By Briton Ryle The Big AI Lie If you own shares of Google (NASDAQ:GOOG) you might be having a WTF moment today. Google reported earnings last night, beat estimates for revenue and earnings, and the stock is getting pounded today… Stocks are supposed to rally after a nice beat, right? So what gives? Why’s Google getting thumped? It’s because of ad revenue. As the quasi-monopoly company for search, ad revenue is Google’s bread, butter, knife to spread it with and plate to serve it on. And Google’s ad revenue has weakened. To explain why, I’ll use an example from my own industry… We in the newsletter biz use Google keywords to attract readers and subscribers. We pony up for specific keywords that we think investors are searching for… like “gold stocks.” If we like gold stocks and have some expertise with them, we might write a Special Report featuring our favorite gold stocks. Then, we “buy” the keywords “gold stocks” so that if you search Google for “gold stocks” you’ll see an offer for our Special Report. The report is free, in exchange for agreeing to get our e-letter, Outsider Club. If it’s a good report (which if it’s an Outsider Club report, it is) and if you find the Outsider Club to be a useful and relevant resource (which you will), you’ll keep reading it. That, in turn, allows us to sell ad space in the e-letter to pay our bills, and maybe offer a subscription service or two with more detailed, actionable investment ideas. The benefit to you from this business model should be pretty obvious. Your humble editors Christian Dehaemer and I are incentivized to give you quality research and insight. If we do, you stick around. If we don’t measure up, you click “unsubscribe” and you’re gone, no questions asked. You literally have all the power in this model. Well, you and Google… Now, Google is so enamored with AI, it has decided to undermine its keyword search business model. Google’s Big Mistake Maybe you’ve noticed that lately, when you search Google for something, the first result you get is often an answer to your question generated by AI. And then the first actual results you get are a bunch of posts from Reddit… Now I don’t know how familiar you are with Reddit. It’s basically an online forum, a bunch of message boards where random internet wingnuts are free to spout off unverified opinions and unvetted explanations for every topic under the sun. You might find a reasonable answer to your search query from Reddit, you might not. Or, if you’ve searched Google for a product or service, you will once again get Reddit results from random Reddit users telling you where they bought that product or service, what they think of it, etc. Google is making it so you have to dig a little deeper to find original content from relevant, verified sources that could be considered expert or at least competent in their field. The AI Lie The obvious question is: why does Google think anybody gives a flying f*** what a bunch of yahoos on Reddit think about, well, anything? The quick answer is: Google doesn’t care. Google is using the Reddit forums to train its AI models to speak more conversationally. And somewhere down the line, Google apparently believes that if it has the capacity to answer any and all search queries with its own AI chat bot , that will be powerful… Which begs another obvious question: where will the money come from? This is the question that investors are asking right now. Right now it is businesses that support Google’s ad business. We pay Google to let us appear in search results. Google is a middleman, it owns the market where companies and customers connect. But now, Google is actually making it harder for companies to connect with customers. Businesses are losing customers and traffic to their websites. Companies aren’t paying Google as much anymore, so Google’s ad revenue is under threat. To make matters worse, Google has ramped its CAPEX spending for AI. It is spending more, to make less. Seems like a bad plan... The AI Lie I’m going to refer back to the George Soros quote[we’ve shared a few times](: Economic history is a never-ending series of episodes based on falsehoods and lies, not truths. It represents the path to big money. The object is to recognize the trend whose premise is false, ride that trend, and step off before it is discredited. So what is the false premise with AI? The lie is that AI will generate revenue. That if you build it, the customers will come… Tech innovation is always deflationary. You switch from copper lines to fiber optic cables and long-distance communications costs plummet. Make transistors smaller and more efficient and computing costs plummet. The same will be true with AI. It’s magical thinking for Google to act on the belief that its AI aspirations won’t impact core aspects of its business. Investors are waking up to that lie right now. Now check out this chart: [nvda shipments] This chart shows you the ten companies that bought the most GPUs from Nvidia last year. The numbers are in thousands. Combined, Meta and Microsoft bought 300,000 Nvidia GPUs last year. These units cost $25,000 each. That’s $7.5 billion from Meta and Microsoft on these chips alone. Add ‘em all up and it’s over $16 billion in revenue for Nvidia in 2023. That’s well over half of Nvidia’s total revenue. There will come a time when Nvidia’s customers have bought all the GPUs they need. There may also come a time when certain companies will realize that all this spending on Nvidia GPUs isn’t really helping their business. The big lie with AI is that there is a return on the investment. It seems pretty clear that some of the investors who have ridden this AI wave understand that the premise of ROI is false, and they are getting off. Cheers, Briton RyleChief Investment Strategist[Outsider Club]( X/Twitter:[( You Might Also Like: Hammer talks about robots [(  How to find winning trades [(  About this sell-off [( This email was sent to {EMAIL}. You can manage your subscription and get our privacy policy [here](. Outsider Club, Copyright © Osprey Financial Research LLC, 5004 Honeygo Center Drive Suite 102-202

Marketing emails from outsiderclub.com

View More
Sent On

08/12/2024

Sent On

06/12/2024

Sent On

04/12/2024

Sent On

03/12/2024

Sent On

02/12/2024

Sent On

26/11/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.