Newsletter Subject

Even After a Managed Loss, a “Beijing Bounce” Is Still in the Cards

From

opportunistictrader.com

Email Address

services@exct.opportunistictrader.com

Sent On

Mon, Feb 19, 2024 01:31 PM

Email Preheader Text

Even After a Managed Loss, a ?Beijing Bounce? Is Still in the Cards By Larry Benedict, editor, T

[Trading With Larry Benedict]( Even After a Managed Loss, a “Beijing Bounce” Is Still in the Cards By Larry Benedict, editor, Trading With Larry Benedict Stop me if you’ve heard this one… “The markets can remain irrational longer than you can remain solvent.” People usually attribute this bit of wisdom to John Maynard Keynes – and whether he said it or not, it remains as true today as it did in Keynes’ day. The message here is simple: No matter how right you think you are, the markets have their own agenda. This irrationality is why no trading strategy is perfect… Why even the most sophisticated predictive models aren’t able to guess what’ll happen next… And why our speculative trade on the iShares China Large-Cap ETF didn’t work out as planned. Let’s take a look… Anticipating a Beijing Bounce On January 16, I told subscribers of The Opportunistic Trader to grab the FXI February 16 $22 calls for a limit of $0.96 or better. So in short, we took a cheap, short-term flier on a bounce in Chinese stocks. In that alert, I told my readers: Countless times over the last 12 months, brave buyers of Chinese stock have ventured in, hoping for a bounce. But the bounce never came. They're all gone at this point, which means now is probably the right time for a small bet on Chinese stocks rebounding. Well, that lack of buyers didn’t last long. A week later, the Chinese Sovereign Wealth Fund stepped in as a huge net buyer of stocks. That news – plus a few other levers Beijing had pulled to stem the three-year rout in Chinese equities – should have buoyed our position in FXI. Here’s the chart I shared on February 9… iShares China Large-Cap ETF (FXI) [chart] Source: e-Signal [(Click here to expand image)]( At the time, I noted the RSI trending up and a bullish crossover in the MACD. Now, I should tell you… this isn’t a slam-dunk setup. That’s why I kept the trade short (zeroing in on the front-month February 16 options) and cheap (less than $100 per contract). That kept our risk as low as possible. Free Trading Resources Have you checked out Larry's free trading resources on his website? It contains a full trading glossary to help kickstart your trading career – at zero cost to you. Just [click here]( to check it out. This Is Why We Keep Our Risk Low Unfortunately, even with Beijing pouring money into stocks, the value of our option began to deteriorate rapidly ahead of expiration. And on February 13, after profits failed to materialize, we cut our losses at around -48%. Yet the rationale for the trade remains intact. Take a look… iShares China Large-Cap ETF (FXI) [chart] Source: e-Signal [(Click here to expand image)]( The RSI continues to trend up. The bullish MACD crossover remains in effect. Further, the 10-day looks poised to cross the 50-day, another bullish indicator. But while the setup remains, the price has met resistance around $22.60 since mid-January. Now, you might be asking… why didn’t we just buy an option farther out? Say, the March 15 expiration? Two reasons: - Too much risk. The March 15 calls had an additional month of time value, making them too expensive for such a speculative trade. - “More time” is a double-edged sword. Sure, you get more time for the trade to work in your favor…but more time for the trade to work against you if the markets decide to be irrational. Now, the rational thing would be for the price to trend up along with the indicators I just mentioned. But remember, irrationality is a hallmark of the financial markets. No matter how prepared you might be or how many indicators you have predicting a move, the markets are going to do what they’re going to do. And sometimes, the only thing you can do is cut your losses and get out of the way. Regards, Larry Benedict Editor, Trading With Larry Benedict [The Opportunistic Trader]( The Opportunistic Trader 55 NE 5th Avenue, Delray Beach, FL 33483 [www.opportunistictrader.com]( To ensure our emails continue reaching your inbox, please [add our email address]( to your address book. This editorial email containing advertisements was sent to {EMAIL} because you subscribed to this service. To stop receiving these emails, click [here](. The Opportunistic Trader welcomes your feedback and questions. But please note: The law prohibits us from giving personalized advice. To contact Customer Service, call toll free Domestic/International: 1-888-208-6550, Mon–Fri, 9am–5pm ET, or email us [here](mailto:feedback@opportunistictrader.com). © 2024 Omnia Research, LLC. All rights reserved. Any reproduction, copying, or redistribution of our content, in whole or in part, is prohibited without written permission from Omnia Research, LLC. [Privacy Policy]( | [Terms of Use](

Marketing emails from opportunistictrader.com

View More
Sent On

08/06/2024

Sent On

08/06/2024

Sent On

07/06/2024

Sent On

07/06/2024

Sent On

07/06/2024

Sent On

06/06/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2024 SimilarMail.