Newsletter Subject

We Trade Factors, Not Stocks

From

opportunistictrader.com

Email Address

services@exct.opportunistictrader.com

Sent On

Fri, Aug 4, 2023 12:31 PM

Email Preheader Text

We Trade Factors, Not Stocks By Eric Shamilov, analyst, Trading With Larry Benedict Most traders spe

[Trading With Larry Benedict]( We Trade Factors, Not Stocks By Eric Shamilov, analyst, Trading With Larry Benedict Most traders spend too much time on market direction. They try hard to formulate an opinion about an outcome where the odds of success are no more than a coin flip. When talking about markets, it’s a favorite topic yet the shallowest. It’s like living in a 3D world but looking at things from just one perspective. The market has multiple dimensions. They’re called factors. Institutional-level traders and investors already know this. People don’t really trade stocks, rates, or commodities. We trade these factors. We’ll buy a basket of “value”… short some “growth”… and wrap it around with an interest rate hedge. These factors affect each other from a distance. Take a look at two of the most popular ones, growth and value. Growth scores stocks based on descriptors like historical sales, earnings growth, and analyst predictions. There are many ways to define it, but they all essentially tell you the same thing. Value, on the other hand, ranks stocks using metrics like price to earnings (P/E) and book value. [Image] The thing to notice is when one spins left, the other spins right. But they always meet in the middle. That’s why factors are much more predictable than stocks. They have better reversion qualities when placed against each other. These factors are made up of groups of stocks, and there are various ways to look at them. As a trader, my preferred method is to look at it from a long/short basis. Recommended Link ["I only trade ONE stock & I NEVER worry about..."]( [image]( The name of the ONE stock (ticker symbol and all) that has helped over 170,000 people discover how to gain their financial freedom... [Learn More.]( -- I’m trying to answer: “What is the effect of buying the top 20 stocks and shorting the bottom 20 when ranked by growth?” (I can swap out growth with “value” or even “momentum” too.) I want to know what strategy I should use next. The chart above is a multi-year view, just to show how entangled these factors can be. But it gets more interesting when you zoom in on shorter time periods. [Image] You could see growth vs. value dancing around each other up until Silicon Valley Bank (SIVB) collapsed in March. Then the trend visibly changed when they crossed over. The growth factor took over in the market. Here are the returns this year of the highest-ranked growth stocks (as defined above): TSLA: Up 110% AMZN: Up 54% NVDA: Up 205% AAPL: Up 47% NFLX: Up 46% MSFT: Up 36% These names should ring a bell. They also comprise 35% of the Invesco QQQ Trust Series 1 (QQQ). So it’s no wonder why the index is up 40% year-to-date (YTD). Growth has dominated. But we’re not in the business of looking to the past. Our job is to look toward the future. The dynamics between these factors change, as do investor preferences. And stocks can exist within different factors at the same time as well. Free Trading Resources Have you checked out Larry's free trading resources on his website? It contains a full trading glossary to help kickstart your trading career – at zero cost to you. Just [click here]( to check it out. Take NVDA, for example. It’s part of the growth factor, but also ranks fourth in “3-month earnings per share (EPS) revisions.” This factor ranks the top stocks according to how much their earnings estimates have gone up over the last three months. And here’s a chart of that factor relative to growth and value. [Image] This view reveals something very interesting – and something that should make the market very, very fearful. One, value is making a big comeback. But here’s the bigger insight: three-month revisions as a factor are leading the weakness in stocks. When that starts to underperform, it means a lot of good news is priced in. And NVDA tops that list. Analysts are projecting higher and higher EPS – typically an outperforming factor – but there are no more new buyers left. This is why on June 23, we called for the large-cap tech to start underperforming value: “The time-tested principles of buying low and selling high will make large-cap tech a laggard in the second half relative to the S&P 500.” But from a macro point of view, there’s something more ominous to glean from trading factors. The top stocks on the list are peppered with real estate stocks. That should make the market think twice about its dismissal of turbulence ahead. Real estate is still a wild card for the economy. The effect of underperforming assets still on bank balance sheets related to commercial real estate is still unknown. [Yet the Fed keeps raising]( rates. Since then, Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLRE) is down 2.67% while SPDR S&P Regional Banking ETF (KRE) is up 14.5%. That’s a factor divergence if I’ve ever seen one. Regards, Eric Shamilov Analyst, Trading With Larry Benedict P.S. I know it’s out there. I see the bears rubbing their paws in anticipation. But in case you were wondering, no one cares about Fitch. Or any credit rating agency. Even when S&P downgraded the U.S. for the first time in 2011, the market made up those losses in five days. There are tons of valid reasons to be bearish, just not because of Fitch. IN CASE YOU MISSED IT… [WARNING: Mandatory U.S. Dollar Recall to Begin on September 20th?]( If you have any U.S. dollars in your bank account… You must see [this shocking video exposing the government’s new plan to recall the U.S. dollar.]( According to Business Insider, this recall “could be imminent.” And if you don’t prepare now, you could end up holding a bunch of worthless U.S. dollars. [Click here to see the three simple steps you can take now to protect your life savings.]( [image]( [The Opportunistic Trader]( The Opportunistic Trader 55 NE 5th Avenue, Delray Beach, FL 33483 [www.opportunistictrader.com]( To ensure our emails continue reaching your inbox, please [add our email address]( to your address book. This editorial email containing advertisements was sent to {EMAIL} because you subscribed to this service. To stop receiving these emails, click [here](. The Opportunistic Trader welcomes your feedback and questions. But please note: The law prohibits us from giving personalized advice. To contact Customer Service, call toll free Domestic/International: 1-888-208-6550, Mon–Fri, 9am–5pm ET, or email us [here](mailto:feedback@opportunistictrader.com). © 2023 Omnia Research, LLC. All rights reserved. Any reproduction, copying, or redistribution of our content, in whole or in part, is prohibited without written permission from Omnia Research, LLC. [Privacy Policy]( | [Terms of Use](

Marketing emails from opportunistictrader.com

View More
Sent On

07/12/2024

Sent On

06/12/2024

Sent On

04/12/2024

Sent On

03/12/2024

Sent On

02/12/2024

Sent On

02/12/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.