Newsletter Subject

Bits: Why the Y2K Conversion Still Matters

From

nytimes.com

Email Address

nytdirect@nytimes.com

Sent On

Wed, Jul 19, 2017 06:07 PM

Email Preheader Text

View in | Add nytdirect@nytimes.com to your address book. Wednesday, July 19, 2017 Testing the grid

View in [Browser]( | Add nytdirect@nytimes.com to your address book. [The New York Times]( [The New York Times]( Wednesday, July 19, 2017 [For the latest updates, go to nytimes.com/bits »]( [Testing the grid at the Niagara Mohawk Power Company plant in Buffalo on Dec. 28, 1999, as part of Y2K preparations.]( Testing the grid at the Niagara Mohawk Power Company plant in Buffalo on Dec. 28, 1999, as part of Y2K preparations. Joe Traver/Reuters [Why the Y2K Conversion Still Matters]( If you’ve seen the movie [“Office Space,”]( you probably know at least a little bit about the computer industry’s Y2K conversion. Peter, the main character in the movie, had a soul-sucking job: Every day, he would sit in an office cubicle combing through old computer code, looking for a flaw that could make computers malfunction when the year turned 2000. Because older computers (pre-1990s mostly) could not store very much information, programmers at the time used two digits to represent a year. They must have figured — wrongly — that at some point all those computers would be replaced. Certainly, long before the end of the century, when the machines would have a hard time telling the difference between 1900 and 2000. To those of us allergic to repetitive tasks, it makes sense that Peter spends the movie trying not to work anymore. But in the late 1990s, companies around the world probably had tens of thousands of workers doing what Peter did — although it’s hard to say if the job was as boring as he claimed. Hundreds of billions of dollars were spent addressing the problem. And guess what? As Farhad Manjoo [writes]( it worked. Major computer problems were avoided, and even though skeptics still think the whole thing was overblown, the biggest reason for that success is most likely the urgency paid to Y2K. Farhad has an intriguing thought: The fight against climate change has a thing or two to learn from the Y2K effort. Both were nebulous threats, somewhere off in the distance. Both faced plenty of skeptics. But people got serious about Y2K and headed off a tech disaster — even if you still think it was all a bunch of baloney. — Jim Kerstetter Read More State of the Art [How Y2K Offers a Lesson for Fighting Climate Change]( By FARHAD MANJOO Some remember the computing scare as a bad joke. But the collective, worldwide effort to prevent calamity could be a model for handling global warming. ADVERTISEMENT More From The Times [A Gamer Channel’s Mission: Send the Trolls Packing]( By LAURA PARKER Misscliks, a channel on the video game streaming platform Twitch, aims to be a safe space for underrepresented gamers, with no tolerance for sexism or bullying. [Hansa Market, a Dark Web Marketplace, Bans the Sale of Fentanyl]( By NATHANIEL POPPER The synthetic opioid has been at the center of a nationwide overdose epidemic. Its ban on a popular vending site has spurred a debate on free market ideology. [Apple Names New China Head as Its Sales Fall]( By PAUL MOZUR Apple has established a position overseeing operations in China in a bid to restore sales momentum and navigate new regulations in the country. Tech We’re Using [Going Low-Tech to Solve Everyday High-Tech Problems]( By BRIAN X. CHEN What technology does our personal tech columnist use to solve readers’ everyday frustrations with gadgets, gear and apps? [Security Company Is Replacing a Mall Robot That Fell Into a Fountain to the Internet’s Delight]( By CHRISTOPHER MELE The K5 has a passing resemblance to R2-D2 — and a dash of Paul Blart, mall cop. Its creators took the online mockery in stride. Tech Tip [Shopping for New Software]( By J. D. BIERSDORFER Online app stores can be a safer and more convenient way to add programs to your computer and devices, but you may not find everything you want. HOW ARE WE DOING? We’d love your feedback on this newsletter. Please email thoughts and suggestions to [bits_newsletter@nytimes.com](mailto:bits_newsletter@nytimes.com?subject=Bits%20Newsletter%20Feedback%20223). ADVERTISEMENT LIKE THIS EMAIL? Forward it to your friends, and let them know they can sign up [here](. WANT MORE NEWS ABOUT CALIFORNIA? Subscribe to our California Today newsletter and get the news and stories that matter to Californians (and anyone else interested in the state), delivered weekday mornings. Sign up [here](. FOLLOW BITS [Twitter] [@nytimesbits]( Get more [NYTimes.com newsletters »]( | Get unlimited access to NYTimes.com and our NYTimes apps. [Subscribe »]( ABOUT THIS EMAIL You received this message because you signed up for NYTimes.com's Bits newsletter. [Unsubscribe]( | [Manage Subscriptions]( | [Change Your Email]( | [Privacy Policy]( | [Contact]( | [Advertise]( Copyright 2017 The New York Times Company 620 Eighth Avenue New York, NY 10018

Marketing emails from nytimes.com

View More
Sent On

08/12/2024

Sent On

08/12/2024

Sent On

07/12/2024

Sent On

07/12/2024

Sent On

07/12/2024

Sent On

07/12/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.