Newsletter Subject

Opinion: Confess your uncertainty

From

nytimes.com

Email Address

nytdirect@nytimes.com

Sent On

Tue, May 2, 2017 12:38 PM

Email Preheader Text

View in | Add nytdirect@nytimes.com to your address book. Tuesday, May 2, 2017 , I urge both Betsy D

View in [Browser]( | Add nytdirect@nytimes.com to your address book. [The New York Times]( [The New York Times]( Tuesday, May 2, 2017 [NYTimes.com/Opinion »]( [David Leonhardt] David Leonhardt Op-Ed Columnist In our politically polarized country, it’s easy to find confirmation for your beliefs. Just ask your like-minded friends. Or watch the television shows, read the writers and listen to the politicians who tend to be on your side. In [my column today]( I urge both Betsy DeVos, the education secretary, and her critics to consider evidence that runs counter to their pre-existing beliefs. I hope DeVos will be open to the evidence showing that school vouchers have largely been a failure, and I hope progressives will be open to the evidence showing the many successes of charter schools. Too often, people either reflexively support both vouchers and charters or oppose both. Working on the column led me to ask which of my own pre-existing beliefs I am willing to question. I came up with two, and I invite readers to send thoughts about either to [leonhardt@nytimes.com](. (When I’ve asked for input from you in the past, the responses have been wonderful.) First, I’ve started to wonder whether my views on health care have been too conservative. For a long time, I’ve believed that single-payer health care was politically infeasible and that private health insurance had significant advantages over government-run programs. But the Republican assault on the private Obamacare exchanges [has led me to think]( that a creeping single-payer system — which is to say, expanded Medicare and Medicaid — may be as politically feasible as the status quo. Substantively, [Medicare]( and [Medicaid]( also seem to be well-run and popular programs. Second, I’ve started to wonder whether my views on immigration are too liberal. I’ve long been a passionate believer in [the benefits of immigration]( to the United States. That belief remains firm. But I have also come to appreciate [some]( [of the]( [conservative arguments]( in favor of reduced immigration among less-skilled workers. In particular, the slowdown of immigration in the mid-20th century seems to have brought significant benefits to the immigrants who had previously arrived in this country. That slowdown allowed them to climb the economic ladder while facing less competition. Shifting today’s mix toward higher-skilled immigrants may be one small way to combat inequality. I’m still trying to work through my thoughts on health care and immigration, and would welcome any reading suggestions or other ideas. I’d also enjoy hearing about your own political uncertainty. At a time when so many of us seem certain about so many issues, a little uncertainty is a healthy thing. The full Opinion report from The Times follows, including Katelyn Beaty on [the male-centric culture of conservative churches]( and Robert P. Jones on [the collapse of the American identity into tribal politics](. Editorial [Donald Trump Embraces Another Despot]( By THE EDITORIAL BOARD His White House invitation to Rodrigo Duterte of the Philippines erodes America’s reputation. Op-Ed Columnist [Trump’s Valueless Foreign Policy]( By ROGER COHEN An unprecedented and dangerous assault on America’s national conscience. Op-Ed Columnist [School Vouchers Aren’t Working, but Choice Is]( By DAVID LEONHARDT Charters and vouchers, often lumped together, are very different. Op-Ed Columnist [Answering Your Climate Questions]( By BRET STEPHENS Readers had many questions and comments regarding my first column. ADVERTISEMENT Op-Ed Contributor [The Mistake Christians Made in Defending Bill O’Reilly]( By KATELYN BEATY In many conservative churches, the default is to defer to powerful men and blame their victims. Editorial [Populism, Politics and Measles]( By THE EDITORIAL BOARD An outbreak in Italy shows how dangerous it is when irresponsible politicians fan skepticism about vaccines. Editorial [President Trump Is Asked to Show His Cards]( By THE EDITORIAL BOARD The Office of Government Ethics is demanding that the White House release the names of officials allowed to bypass its own ethics rules. Harry Campbell [Op-Ed Contributor]( [The Collapse of American Identity]( By ROBERT P. JONES We’re losing a shared consensus of who we are to diverging political narratives. Contributing Op-Ed Writer [The End of the Australian Dream?]( By LISA PRYOR When you have a nation full of people trying to get to the top, eventually most of the population is forced to run just to keep up. Vietnam ‘67 [The Great Vietnam War Novel Was Not Written by an American]( By VIET THANH NGUYEN Literature about the war and its aftermath by Vietnamese and Vietnamese-Americans is plentiful and good. Too few Americans read it. Op-Ed Contributor [How Ueli Steck Met Mountaineering’s Oldest Companion: Tragedy]( By MICHAEL WEJCHERT He pushed the limits of alpine climbing, ascending fast and alone, until his death this weekend. Fixes [Going Digital to Rescue Food]( By TINA ROSENBERG Programs designed to avoid wasting food are now using algorithms and networks to match food to hungry people. HOW ARE WE DOING? We’d love your feedback on this newsletter. Please email thoughts and suggestions to [newsletters@nytimes.com](mailto:newsletters@nytimes.com?subject=Opinion%20Today%20Newsletter%20Feedback). ADVERTISEMENT IN CASE YOU MISSED IT | SUNDAY REVIEW [How the Left Learned to Hate Like the Right]( By MICHELLE GOLDBERG Liberals are discovering what conservatives have known for years: Negative energy is a powerful force. Letters [Answering Bret Stephens on Climate Science]( Readers react to the first column by a conservative writer who thinks we should be “skeptical of an overweening scientism.” SIGN UP FOR THE VIETNAM ’67 NEWSLETTER Examining America’s long war in Southeast Asia [through the course]( of a single year. FOLLOW OPINION [Facebook] [FACEBOOK]( [Twitter] [@nytopinion]( [Pinterest] [Pinterest]( Get more [NYTimes.com newsletters »](  | Get unlimited access to NYTimes.com and our NYTimes apps for just $0.99. [Subscribe »]( ABOUT THIS EMAIL You received this message because you signed up for NYTimes.com's Opinion Today newsletter. [Unsubscribe]( | [Manage Subscriptions]( | [Change Your Email]( | [Privacy Policy]( | [Contact]( | [Advertise]( Copyright 2017 The New York Times Company 620 Eighth Avenue New York, NY 10018

Marketing emails from nytimes.com

View More
Sent On

08/12/2024

Sent On

08/12/2024

Sent On

07/12/2024

Sent On

07/12/2024

Sent On

07/12/2024

Sent On

07/12/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.