Newsletter Subject

What We're Reading: Great Reads, the Direct Approach

From

nytimes.com

Email Address

nytdirect@nytimes.com

Sent On

Fri, Dec 30, 2016 10:04 PM

Email Preheader Text

Writing in the first person can often be indulgent and uninteresting, but when done right it can bri

Writing in the first person can often be indulgent and uninteresting, but when done right it can bring illuminating perspective. Here are a handful of stories we published this year that make deft use of a personal approach to a range of subjects. [The New York Times] What We’re Reading If your friends would enjoy our recommendations of stories from around the web, forward this email and invite them to sign up at [nytimes.com/wwr]. Writing in the first person can often be indulgent and uninteresting, but when done right it can bring illuminating perspective. Here are a handful of stories we published this year that make deft use of a personal approach to a range of subjects. [author] Jake Silverstein Editor in chief, Times Magazine [Large Image] Vincenzo Pinto/Agence France-Presse – Getty Images [David’s Ankles] Sam Anderson’s reported essay explores the microfractures in the ankles of Michelangelo’s famous sculpture. Sam used his own obsession with the David as a way of setting up the story’s themes. [Go »] [Large Image] Glenna Gordon for The New York Times [Choosing a School for My Daughter in a Segregated City] Nikole Hannah-Jones’s masterful public-interest story used her own experience as the mother of a daughter entering the New York City school system to explore that system’s enduring inequities. [Go »] [Large Image] Jun Cen [Making House] This beautiful essay by Rachel Cusk, about domesticity, is deeply personal and revelatory, yet it maintains such powerful restraint throughout. [Go »] [Large Image] Alamy [Last Taboo] A searing essay by Wesley Morris, about how American pop culture can’t deal with black male sexuality, takes several surprising and deeply affecting swerves into personal territory. [Go »] [Large Image] Christopher Anderson/Magnum, for The New York Times [The Mysterious Metamorphosis of Chuck Close] The writer of this profile, Wil Hylton, used his own entanglements with the story to deepen our understanding of the great painter Chuck Close’s situation. [Go »] Make a friend’s day: Forward this email. Get this from a friend? [Sign up here]. Share your feedback on What We’re Reading. Email us at [wwr@nytimes.com] This is an automated email. Please do not reply directly to this email. You received this message because you signed up for [NYTimes.com]'s What We're Reading newsletter. Click to [unsubscribe]. [Copyright 2016 The New York Times Company]. [NYTimes.com] 620 Eighth Avenue New York, NY 10018

Marketing emails from nytimes.com

View More
Sent On

08/06/2024

Sent On

08/06/2024

Sent On

08/06/2024

Sent On

08/06/2024

Sent On

08/06/2024

Sent On

08/06/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2024 SimilarMail.