Newsletter Subject

Bits: Farhad’s and Mike’s Week in Tech: Fake News, Trolls and Other Spectacles

From

nytimes.com

Email Address

nytdirect@nytimes.com

Sent On

Sat, Nov 19, 2016 02:03 PM

Email Preheader Text

The latest technology news and buzz from around the web. View in .) Maybe that will be the product t

The latest technology news and buzz from around the web. View in [Browser] | Add [nytdirect@nytimes.com] to your address book. Saturday, November 19, 2016 [The New York Times] [For the latest updates, go to nytimes.com/technology »] [The New York Times] Saturday, November 19, 2016 [Twitter’s #VideoNow event in New York City in 2015. Twitter rolled out new tools for users to fight abuse, and it also suspended several accounts run by people in the white-supremacist “alt-right.”] Twitter’s #VideoNow event in New York City in 2015. Twitter rolled out new tools for users to fight abuse, and it also suspended several accounts run by people in the white-supremacist “alt-right.” Bryan Thomas for The New York Times [Farhad’s and Mike’s Week in Tech: Fake News, Trolls and Other Spectacles] Each Saturday, Farhad Manjoo and Mike Isaac, technology reporters at The New York Times, review [the week’s news], offering analysis and maybe a joke or two about the most important developments in the tech industry. Farhad: Hello there, Mike! I was just reading that [Bob Dylan decided to skip the ceremony] for his Nobel Prize. He says he’s busy. What a power move. I’m going to take a cue from Dylan the next time Dean Baquet, our executive editor, asks to see me in his office. Mike: I tried that once with Dean. Then, mysteriously, I had a bunch of late-duty weeknight shifts to cover for the rest of the month. Good luck with that. Farhad: O.K., let’s talk tech. It was a busy week for social networks. Facebook and Twitter continued to face fallout from the ways they had been used during the election. For Facebook, the story was fake news. Although Mark Zuckerberg, the chief executive, played down the role that misinformation spreading through his site might have had in the election, some employees at Facebook have been more skeptical, [as you reported]. Mike: Yeah, maybe if he took a break [from eating all that dolphin], Mark would realize that he has a real fake news problem. Farhad: Mike, I’m pretty sure that was a fake news story. Mark doesn’t eat dolphin; he’s partial to lion cubs. Anyway, on Monday, [both Google and Facebook changed their advertising policies] to explicitly prohibit fake news sites from making money from their lies. And then President Obama — who was long the subject of a fake news campaign regarding his birthplace, though that wasn’t pushed by Facebook as much as it was by the new president-elect — [weighed in against fake news]. This story doesn’t seem over, does it? Mike: Not by a long shot. I think this is truly one of Facebook’s existential threats, and something it is now forced to take seriously. Mark tried shrugging it off at a conference last week, but that’s clearly not going to work. The problem is, once you’ve optimized your entire site for the spread of viral news and engagement, it’s sort of hard to put the brakes on just one part of that. In short, I wouldn’t want to be in their shoes right now. Farhad: Twitter also made some news. The short-message social network that we all love to hate has long been a haven for racists, sexists and various other kinds of trolls. On Tuesday, it[rolled out new tools for users to fight abuse], and it also[suspended several accounts] run by people in the white-supremacist “alt-right.” Jack Dorsey, Twitter’s chief executive, also [apologized for an ad] placed by a neo-Nazi group that appeared on Twitter. Anyway, do you have anything to say about this? I [vowed to quit Twitter]. I didn’t quit, but I did delete the app from my phone and have thus been looking at it a lot less. It’s liberating. Mike: I give you a week before you reinstall the app on your phone. I did take a few breaks from Twitter for a few days after the election, and in the run-up over the last 18 months of the race. Sometimes the vitriol and blaming and arguing is just too much, especially when I’m not in a good head space. But I truly believe it still provides a net positive for the world. Through the most optimistic lens, it gives a voice to the voiceless, which has done more good than harm. After all, I think as a writer I’m more on board the free-speech train and all the costs that come with it than others might be. Farhad: O.K., but there’s one more social network to talk about. Snapchat! Or, as it now wants to be known to folks on Wall Street, Snap Inc. Snap Inc. is the parent company to Snapchat, which is an app that millions of people who don’t read this newsletter probably use. You use it to send pictures of funny faces. It’s really great. Mike: I like how we’ve moved from “world-changing app based largely upon First Amendment practices in action” to “app that makes your face look like a dog.” Farhad: Anyway, two things about Snap. First, the company finally released the photo glasses that it showed off earlier this year. It did so in a predictably goofy way: The glasses, called Spectacles, are available only through special vending machines that move around the country. If you happen to be near one, you line up for a long time and then get your glasses. Mike: The vending machines look like [large and terrifying Minions], a meme I thought had died out and sadly has yet to do so. Thanks, Snapchat. Farhad: Yeah, I asked the company to send me some and did not hear back. But [others who’ve tried them seem to love them]. Also, [Snap filed papers to take itself public]. What do you think, is this the next Facebook? Mike: Nah, not really. I see a limited market cap for Snap unless it can find a way to break out of targeting only younger demographics. Granted, getting ’em while they’re young and then having that generation grow up to be mainstream users is kind of what Facebook did. But what Snap does seems fundamentally different from social networks of the past. I find it hard to see where those major sources of growth are going to come from in the future. Of course, maybe these Spectacles actually take off. Maybe this is the wearable that makes the behavior — recording video directly from your face — a mainstream activity. We saw what happened with the huge embarrassing failure that was Google Glass, so I think everyone is more skeptical these days, as they should be. But Spectacles look a lot cooler than Glass did. (Probably because they look like they came straight out of the[Moscot display window].) Maybe that will be the product that makes Snap a hit. Farhad: Yeah, it could happen. After all, I think Spectacles look really cool, and I’m a pretty good barometer for upcoming fashion trends. O.K., that’s it for this week! Farhad and Mike will be off next Saturday after eating Thanksgiving turkey. The Saturday newsletter will resume on Dec. 3.  More From the Times [Miraj Hassanpur, a California State University graduate, had a job trial at a Palo Alto start-up.] [Udacity, an Online Learning Start-Up, Offers Tech Job Trials] By STEVE LOHR With a new program, Blitz, Udacity is expanding an effort to train workers in high-tech fields in which workers are in high demand. [Chatbots supporting Donald J. Trump outdid similar programs supporting Hillary Clinton, a report from Oxford University found. “A lot of what they pass around is false news,” a researcher said of the bots.] [Automated Pro-Trump Bots Overwhelmed Pro-Clinton Messages, Researchers Say] By JOHN MARKOFF The purpose of the chatbots was to rant, confuse people or muddy discussions on Twitter in the days before the election, an Oxford University report found.  In Case You Missed It App Smart [Flinch allows two people to engage in a staring contest.] [After a Bitter Election Season, Apps to Spread Good Cheer] By KIT EATON Motivational apps encourage you to reach a goal or “pay it forward” with good deeds, while a private messaging app can bring you closer to loved ones. [Protecting Your Digital Life in 7 Easy Steps] By JONAH ENGEL BROMWICH Here are some basic actions for making your personal data more difficult for attackers to access.  ADVERTISEMENT  Like this email? Forward it to your friends, and let them know they can sign up [here].  FOLLOW Bits [Twitter] [@nytimesbits] ABOUT THIS EMAIL You received this message because you signed up for NYTimes.com's Bits newsletter. [Unsubscribe] | [Manage Subscriptions] | [Change Your Email] | [Privacy Policy] | [Contact] | [Advertise] Copyright 2016 The New York Times Company | 620 Eighth Avenue New York, NY 10018

Marketing emails from nytimes.com

View More
Sent On

08/12/2024

Sent On

08/12/2024

Sent On

07/12/2024

Sent On

07/12/2024

Sent On

07/12/2024

Sent On

07/12/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.