Newsletter Subject

David Leonhardt: Their tax rate is 0%

From

nytimes.com

Email Address

nytdirect@nytimes.com

Sent On

Mon, Apr 15, 2019 12:00 PM

Email Preheader Text

You should be jealous of Amazon, G.M. and Coors. View in | Add nytdirect@nytimes.com to your address

You should be jealous of Amazon, G.M. and Coors. View in [Browser]( | Add nytdirect@nytimes.com to your address book. [The New York Times]( [The New York Times]( Monday, April 15, 2019 [NYTimes.com/David-Leonhardt »]( [Op-Ed Columnist] Op-Ed Columnist Amazon. Delta Air Lines. Chevron. IBM. General Motors. Molson Coors. Eli Lilly. What do these companies have in common? They paid no federal taxes last year. Thanks to President Trump’s 2017 tax law, the number of Fortune 500 companies that pay no federal taxes roughly doubled last year, to 60, according to an analysis by the [Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy]( a research group. Some of them effectively paid negative taxes, because they received a refund. The number of companies paying no taxes has risen for two main reasons. First, the Trump tax law expanded some corporate tax breaks, such as the one for the purchase of machinery and vehicles. Second, the law reduced the top-line corporate tax rate, which means that some companies now have a low enough tax bill that they can wipe it out entirely with tax breaks. Altogether, the law led to a 31 percent decline in corporate-tax revenue last year. That decline has helped cause an increase in the deficit. As the law professors [Rebecca Kysar and Linda Sugin]( have written, the Trump tax cut is financed “on the backs of future generations.” I think some decline in the top-line corporate-tax rate — which was higher than in most other countries — was justified. But the Trump tax cut didn’t go about it in the right way. It cut the rate too steeply and kept, or expanded, too many tax breaks. A better bill [would have paired]( a more gentle decline in the rate with a tougher approach to tax breaks, essentially trying to level the playing field among companies. Even before the law change, American companies [weren’t actually paying very much]( in taxes. “At a time when the public’s confidence in our elected officials and our institutions is especially low, the specter of big corporations avoiding all income taxes on billions in profits sends a strong and corrosive signal to Americans: that the tax system is stacked against them, in favor of corporations and the wealthiest Americans,” writes Matthew Gardner, the lead author of the Institute on Taxation report. BuzzFeed response Ben Smith, the editor of BuzzFeed News, emailed me Friday, taking objection to [that day’s newsletter]( in which I described one of BuzzFeed’s Trump-Russia stories as dubious. I was referring to [BuzzFeed’s January story]( that claimed Trump “directed” and “personally instructed” Michael Cohen, his former personal lawyer, to lie about talks about a Trump Tower in Moscow. Smith wrote to me that “the underlying claim — that Trump told Cohen to lie to Congress — has been backed up in Cohen’s own testimony, revelations about the edits Trump and his lawyers made, a congratulatory phone call he received after giving his false testimony, and more.” He added: “We have unearthed more facts than any other news outlet about the details of the Trump Tower Moscow deal — feel free to [dig in here]( — and continue to stand by the Cohen story, with good reason.” I still disagree. Since BuzzFeed’s story (which Robert Mueller’s office disputed), Cohen has said that Trump used code words and implication to get him to lie. If BuzzFeed or another media organization were doing the same story today, I think the language would be different in important ways. But I’m always happy to highlight substantive disagreement with my arguments, and I appreciate that Smith took the time to write. I’d also note that BuzzFeed News has been doing excellent journalism, both on [Russia]( and [other]( [subjects](. ADVERTISEMENT If you enjoy this newsletter, forward it to friends! They can [sign up for themselves here]( — and they don’t need to be a Times subscriber. The newsletter is published every weekday, with help from my colleague Ian Prasad Philbrick. David’s Morning NYT Read [To Nurture Nature, Neglect Your Lawn]( By MARGARET RENKL Why poison the earth when you can have wildflowers at your feet and songbirds in your trees without even trying? The Full Opinion Report [The Only Answer Is Less Internet]( By ROSS DOUTHAT Our emerging post-privacy order isn’t quite totalitarian, but it’s getting there. [Demonizing Minority Women]( By CHARLES M. BLOW Representative Ilhan Omar is the latest target in a trend of conservatives attacking women of color. [Is America Becoming an Oligarchy?]( By MICHAEL TOMASKY Growing inequality threatens our most basic democratic principles. [Trump Can’t Blame Mexico for Our Drug Problem]( By IOAN GRILLO This tactic dates back to Nixon — and it has always involved a lot of hypocrisy. [The Real Enemy of Pakistani Women Is Not Men]( By BINA SHAH It is society’s acceptance of patriarchy. [Has Germany Forgotten the Lessons of the Nazis?]( By PAUL HOCKENOS The country’s culture of remembrance is crumbling. [Don’t Let a Killer Pollutant Loose]( By JOHN BALMES The Trump administration is moving to ease standards on a particularly deadly air contaminant. [Canada’s Perverse Climate Change Policy: Gas Up]( By GEOFF DEMBICKI Pushing toward the worst scenario despite better options for the future of the environment. [!!!Click Me!!!]( By ROSE WONG The online ads are following you. [Everyone’s Income Taxes Should Be Public]( By BINYAMIN APPELBAUM Disclosure of tax payments would make it easier to hold politicians accountable. It also would help to reduce fraud and economic inequality. [The Massacre That Led to the End of the British Empire]( By GYAN PRAKASH The events at Jallianwala Bagh, in the Indian city of Amritsar, marked the beginning of the resistance against colonial governance. [Those Cuban Ballplayers? They Won’t Be Coming Here]( By THE EDITORIAL BOARD President Trump killed a deal that would have allowed Cuban baseball players to enter the United States legally and safely. [Keeping the Stuff of Memories, Even in the Digital Age]( Readers tell how they manage in the age of the internet. ADVERTISEMENT FEEDBACK and HELP If you have thoughts about this newsletter, email me at [leonhardt@nytimes.com](mailto:leonhardt@nytimes.com?subject=David%20Leonhardt%20Newsletter%20Feedback). If you have questions about your Times account, delivery problems or other non-journalistic issues, you can visit our [Help Page]( or [contact The Times](. FOLLOW OPINION [Facebook] [FACEBOOK]( [Twitter] [@nytopinion]( [Pinterest] [Pinterest]( Get more [NYTimes.com newsletters »](  | Get unlimited access to NYTimes.com and our NYTimes apps. [Subscribe »]( ABOUT THIS EMAIL You received this message because you signed up for NYTimes.com's Opinion Today newsletter. [Unsubscribe]( | [Manage Subscriptions]( | [Change Your Email]( | [Privacy Policy]( | [Contact]( | [Advertise]( Copyright 2019 The New York Times Company 620 Eighth Avenue New York, NY 10018

Marketing emails from nytimes.com

View More
Sent On

08/12/2024

Sent On

08/12/2024

Sent On

07/12/2024

Sent On

07/12/2024

Sent On

07/12/2024

Sent On

07/12/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.