Newsletter Subject

David Leonhardt: There is no boom

From

nytimes.com

Email Address

nytdirect@nytimes.com

Sent On

Mon, Mar 11, 2019 11:59 AM

Email Preheader Text

Want proof? Look at the economic forecasts of the past decade — and all the disappointments tha

Want proof? Look at the economic forecasts of the past decade — and all the disappointments that have followed. View in [Browser]( | Add nytdirect@nytimes.com to your address book. [The New York Times]( [The New York Times]( Monday, March 11, 2019 [NYTimes.com/David-Leonhardt »]( [Op-Ed Columnist] Op-Ed Columnist For a decade now, the people whose job it is to predict the economy’s performance have made the same mistake, again and again and again. They have been too optimistic. The pattern started during the 2007-09 financial crisis, of course. But it didn’t end there. In the immediate aftermath, the Federal Reserve was too quick to see “green shoots” sprouting across the economy. And in the years since, forecasters at both the Fed and in the private sector have repeatedly made forecasts that turned out to be too sunny. [A chart that runs with my column today]( shows this pattern. It’s an important one, because it helps debunk the notion that the American economy is now enjoying an economic boom. If it were really a boom, the economy wouldn’t keep falling short of the experts’ predictions. I was inspired to dig into these forecasts — and the errors in them — after reading [a new academic paper]( last week, by Lawrence Summers, the former Treasury secretary, and Lukasz Rachel, of the Bank of England. That paper is part of Summers’s continuing argument that the economy is suffering from something called “secular stagnation.” The economy isn’t simply enduring a slow recovery from the crisis. Its problems are deeper, as I lay out in the column. More on ‘Secular Stagnation’ - “The core of the problem is that there is not enough private investment to absorb, at normal interest rates, all the private saving,” [Summers wrote last week]( in a Washington Post op-ed. “The result is extremely low interest rates, weak demand, and low growth and inflation, along with the bidding up of the price of existing capital assets.” - Summers also explained his “secular stagnation” theory [in a WBUR segment]( last week. - “Without the push of stimulative monetary or fiscal policy — or both — the U.S. economy will probably slow and the unemployment rate will rise,” wrote [Jared Bernstein]( also in The Washington Post, on the same broad subject. “The Democrats’ progressive agenda is not only a response to the upward redistribution that Republicans have successfully pushed since President Ronald Reagan. It is also a coherent and essential response to underlying stagnation that has grown to plague advanced economies.” - My colleague [Paul Krugman]( has also weighed in. - Ben Bernanke, the former Federal Reserve chairman, has criticized the secular-stagnation theory, as Vox’s [Matt Yglesias]( chronicled in 2015. Waiting for Mueller Regular readers may recall that Quinta Jurecic of Lawfare wrote this newsletter for a week last summer while I was on break. Over the weekend, she published [a handy guide]( to the upcoming — or so we all assume — Mueller report. Correction I misspelled the last name of Jordan Weissmann, the Slate economics writer, in a newsletter last week. It has two n’s, not one. ADVERTISEMENT If you enjoy this newsletter, forward it to friends! They can [sign up for themselves here]( — and they don’t need to be a Times subscriber. The newsletter is published every weekday, with help from my colleague Ian Prasad Philbrick. David’s Morning NYT Read [Socialism and the 2020 American Election]( By ROGER COHEN In Europe, socialism carries no red-scare potency. It’s part of life, and Europe is not Venezuela. David’s Latest Column [The Experts Keep Getting the Economy Wrong]( By DAVID LEONHARDT Again and again, forecasters have been too optimistic — which is a sign of the economy’s funk. The Full Opinion Report [Make America Measles-Free Again]( By THE EDITORIAL BOARD A once-eradicated disease is making a comeback around the country. Lawmakers and social media platforms each have a role to play in fighting back. [• Watch ‘Fool House Rock: Anti-Vaxx Fallacies,’ an Opinion video]( [The Real Horror of the Anti-Vaxxers]( By FRANK BRUNI This isn’t just a public health crisis. It’s a public sanity one. [New York State Should Investigate the Trump Organization]( By JED HANDELSMAN SHUGERMAN The attorney general should open a special civil proceeding against the business and its officials. [The Real Aliens in Our Backyard]( By MARGARET RENKL The future of this country’s wild spaces may depend on changing the way suburban Americans think about plants. [Idolatry at the Western Wall]( By BARI WEISS The fight against religious fundamentalism sometimes means getting spit on. [Vaping Is Big Tobacco’s Bait and Switch]( By JENEEN INTERLANDI Cigarettes hooked generations of teenagers. Now e-cigarettes might do the same. [Blocking Sex Ed Puts Our Children in Danger]( By ANDREA BARRICA Refusing to provide children with medically accurate information about their own sexual development isn’t ideological — it’s negligent. [Trump Aside, What’s the U.S. Role in NATO?]( By BARRY R. POSEN The Cold War alliance was formed to stop Soviet expansion. Seventy years later, Europe can defend itself against an underpopulated and much-weakened Russia. [The Democratic Candidates Should Tell Us Now Who They’ll Put on the Supreme Court]( By JAMES FORMAN JR. And they should choose nominees who will help dismantle mass incarceration. [Will There Be Smoking Guns in the Mueller Report?]( By QUINTA JURECIC I’ve followed the investigation closely. Here’s what I’ll be looking for. [America, Say My Name]( By VIET THANH NGUYEN I tried Troy. I stuck with Viet. [What Alex Trebek Is Really Like]( By KEN JENNINGS An ode to our generation’s Cronkite. [The Black Gun Owner Next Door]( By TIYA MILES I’m an African-American historian and, on most issues, decidedly liberal. Could I rethink my anti-gun stance? [The Role of Diet in Promoting Health]( Doctors and other health professionals discuss what we know and what don’t know. ADVERTISEMENT FEEDBACK and HELP If you have thoughts about this newsletter, email me at [leonhardt@nytimes.com](mailto:leonhardt@nytimes.com?subject=David%20Leonhardt%20Newsletter%20Feedback). If you have questions about your Times account, delivery problems or other non-journalistic issues, you can visit our [Help Page]( or [contact The Times](. FOLLOW OPINION [Facebook] [FACEBOOK]( [Twitter] [@nytopinion]( [Pinterest] [Pinterest]( Get more [NYTimes.com newsletters »](  | Get unlimited access to NYTimes.com and our NYTimes apps. [Subscribe »]( ABOUT THIS EMAIL You received this message because you signed up for NYTimes.com's David Leonhardt newsletter. [Unsubscribe]( | [Manage Subscriptions]( | [Change Your Email]( | [Privacy Policy]( | [Contact]( | [Advertise]( Copyright 2019 The New York Times Company 620 Eighth Avenue New York, NY 10018

Marketing emails from nytimes.com

View More
Sent On

08/12/2024

Sent On

08/12/2024

Sent On

07/12/2024

Sent On

07/12/2024

Sent On

07/12/2024

Sent On

07/12/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.