Why would we help Saudi Arabia build a bomb?
View in [Browser]( | Add nytdirect@nytimes.com to your address book.
[The New York Times](
[The New York Times](
Saturday, March 2, 2019
[NYTimes.com/Kristof »](
[Prince Mohammed bin Salman of Saudi Arabia escorting Jared Kushner and Ivanka Trump in Riyadh in 2017.](
Prince Mohammed bin Salman of Saudi Arabia escorting Jared Kushner and Ivanka Trump in Riyadh in 2017. Jonathan Ernst/Reuters
Jared Kushner slipped into Saudi Arabia a few days ago for a meeting with Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, and Iâve been trying without success to get the White House to tell me whether they discussed a boneheaded proposal to transfer nuclear power plants in Saudi Arabia. Of all the harebrained and unscrupulous projects backed by the Trump administration, this stands out. It could put Saudi Arabia on a path to nuclear weapons, and it represents a monumental conflict of interest for Kushner.
Itâs just bizarre that Trump would work to denuclearize North Korea and Iran while helping to nuclearize Saudi Arabia. [My Sunday column]( is about this reckless policy, which is compounded by conflict of interest (the company that would sell the nuclear power plants bailed out the Kushnerâs real estate company last August). [Hereâs what you need to know](.
Trumpâs efforts to denuclearize North Korea did not, of course, go so well this last week. The Hanoi summit collapsed, and although there are conflicting accounts it seems that Trump wasnât willing to lift substantial sanctions in exchange for North Korea dismantling the nuclear complex at Yongbyon. That was the right call. But in a larger sense, the failure was in holding a summit without sufficient advance preparation. A veteran diplomat once said that the job of presidents at a summit is to pull rabbits out of hats, and the job of diplomats ahead of time is to stuff the rabbits into hats. Thatâs what didnât happen this time, and I analyzed the failure â and the risks ahead â [in this essay](.
It was also disheartening to see our president flatter Kim Jong-un as a âgreat leaderâ and âfriendâ who was not responsible for what happened to American student Otto Warmbier. On my 2017 visit to North Korea, I confronted the North Koreans about Otto [in this clip]( and if an American journalist can do it while on North Korean soil, an American president can do so at a press conference. Look, I believe in engaging countries like North Korea, Saudi Arabia and Iran, but thereâs no need to fawn over them and degrade our own values. North Koreans risk their lives to listen to foreign news broadcasts, and Trumpâs emergence as spokesman for Kim is an insult to them.
Actually, the biggest nuclear risk in the last week did not involve North Korea or Iran or Saudi Arabia, but India and Pakistan. Iâve occasionally been involved in war games that model real-life conflicts, and those involving India and Pakistan are particularly scary because they often escalate into a nuclear exchange (India is always tempted to try a preemptive strike to take out Pakistanâs nuclear capacity, and Pakistan is on a hair trigger because it knows this â a dangerous combination). After Pakistan shot down and captured an Indian pilot, tensions were very high. But while I havenât been a fan of Pakistanâs prime minister, Imran Khan, he and the Pakistan military handled the episode wisely and on Friday returned the pilot. That seems to defuse the immediate crisis, but Pakistan also has to move against terrorist groups like JEM and LET that operate on its soil. And itâs worth noting that Hindu extremists in India and Pakistani Muslim extremists empower each other and destabilize the region.
Jared Kushner is in the news now because of reports that [Trump overruled intelligence officials]( and ordered that he get a top-secret clearance. But that will fade. The bigger long-term risk is that the U.S. will help put Saudi Arabia on a path toward nuclear weapons in a way that will destabilize the region for many decades to come. Itâs difficult to think of a more disastrous foreign policy than Americaâs toward Saudi Arabia. [Read my take](.
So Long, Farewell
Bibi Netanyahu may finally be nearing the end of his political career, after Israelâs attorney general stated an intention of indicting him for bribery. Bibi has said he wonât step down if indicted, but this would increase the chance that Benny Gantz wins the April elections. Bibi has been prime minister in all for 13 years and is a historic figure in Israel, but Iâve been following him since he was an unusually articulate deputy foreign minister, and I think he has had a pernicious influence on Israel and the region. He has made a two-state solution less likely, and he has poisoned the well of Israel-American relations, so that Republicans strongly back Israel and Democrats are more skeptical. Paradoxically, the strongest constituency for hardline Israeli governments in the U.S. is not American Jews, but American evangelical Christians. I donât know what to think of Benny Gantz, but I wonât mourn the last of Bibiâs reign.
How to Save Lives
Suicide rates are at a 30-year high in the United States, and Americans sometimes shrug and think thereâs nothing we can do about this. In fact, research (including some randomized controlled trials, the gold standard of evidence) show that outreach and counseling, plus reducing access to guns, can help save lives. [Hereâs a good summary.](
ADVERTISEMENT
You can connect with me on [Facebook](. If you have friends who might enjoy this newsletter, forward this email or tell them they can [sign up here](. Send feedback or tech questions to kristof-newsletter@nytimes.com.
Recent Columns
[After the Trump-Kim Failure](
The president was right to walk rather than accept a bad deal, but look out ahead.
[âHe Is a Racist, He Is a Con Man, and He Is a Cheatâ](
Nixon was bad, but nothing compared to Michael Cohenâs portrayal of âgangsterâ Trump.
What Iâm Reading in The Times
[After Cohen, Republicans Are Now Trumpâs Fixers](
By TIMOTHY EGAN
G.O.P. lawmakers who started by making excuses for the presidentâs most repulsive personal traits have now moved on to bedrock principles. They are headed for a reckoning.
[Netanyahu Stoops to Survive](
By THE EDITORIAL BOARD
The Israeli prime minister enters into an alliance with a radical right-wing party to save his political career.
ADVERTISEMENT
NEED HELP?
Review our newsletter [help page]( or contact us [for assistance](.
FOLLOW NICHOLAS KRISTOF
[Facebook] [FACEBOOK](
[Twitter] [@nickkristof](
[Instagram] [nickkristof](
Get more [NYTimes.com newsletters »](
|
Get unlimited access to NYTimes.com and our NYTimes apps. [Subscribe »](
ABOUT THIS EMAIL
You received this message because you signed up for NYTimes.com's Nicholas Kristof newsletter.
[Unsubscribe]( | [Manage Subscriptions]( | [Change Your Email]( | [Privacy Policy]( | [Contact]( | [Advertise](
Copyright 2019 The New York Times Company
620 Eighth Avenue New York, NY 10018