Newsletter Subject

Opinion: The left needs Its own nationalism

From

nytimes.com

Email Address

nytdirect@nytimes.com

Sent On

Tue, Oct 16, 2018 12:11 PM

Email Preheader Text

Also: The Saudis tell a blatant lie, and Trump seems ready to accept it. View in | Add nytdirect@nyt

Also: The Saudis tell a blatant lie, and Trump seems ready to accept it. View in [Browser]( | Add nytdirect@nytimes.com to your address book. [The New York Times]( [The New York Times]( Tuesday, October 16, 2018 [NYTimes.com/Opinion »]( [David Leonhardt] David Leonhardt Op-Ed Columnist The American left needs its own nationalism. It would obviously be a nationalism that rejected the racism and corruption of President Trump’s version. But it would still be a coherent story about how progressive policies would protect and promote the interests of Americans above all. It would be a story about the threats to today’s United States — climate change, global autocracy, a rising China and a plutocratic class trying to dominate the American political and economic systems. This progressive nationalism would promote itself as the antidote to these threats. And I think it would have a much better chance to win over voters than a set of sensible but disjointed economic policies. The Democratic Party has not offered any such story in this year’s midterms, but that may be O.K. A midterm election is almost unavoidably a referendum on the governing party. A presidential campaign is different, however, and the 2020 campaign will soon be underway. “The perception of a common national identity is essential to democracies and to the modern welfare state, which depends on the willingness of citizens to pay taxes to aid fellow citizens whom they may never have set eyes upon,” [John Judis writes]( in a Times op-ed I strongly recommend. “To achieve their historic objectives, liberals and social democrats will have to respond constructively to, rather than dismiss, the nationalist reaction to globalization.” The Khashoggi case. The most bracing piece I’ve read on the apparent murder of the Saudi dissident Jamal Khashoggi is a Washington Post op-ed [by Robert Kagan](. “Welcome to the breakdown of the liberal world order the United States once upheld,” Kagan, a hawkish foreign-policy expert, writes. “You’re seeing just the beginning.” In the story’s latest turn, the Saudi government is reportedly planning to say that rogue agents killed Khashoggi during an interrogation. The Trump administration has given early indications of accepting this hard-to-believe tale. “More than anything else, Trump's embrace of implausible deniability (both for himself and those he prefers not to hold accountable) has offered bad actors around the world exactly the kind of fig leaf that emboldens and encourages them to do more and worse,” [tweeted the Brookings Institution’s Susan Hennessey](. But Trump is not the entirety of the United States government, and [Slate’s Joshua Keating]( points out that presidents tend to be more protective of the alliance with Saudi Arabia than Congress does. In general, Saudi Arabia is quite unpopular in the United States, including among many members of Congress. The Saudis “may have miscalculated how deep the support is outside the White House,” Keating writes. The case is the latest misstep by Saudi Arabia’s crown prince, Mohammed bin Salman. Those missteps reveal a “headstrong, vengeful, and not very competent leader who has done an impressive job of consolidating power and a miserable job of using it,” [writes Harvard’s Stephen Walt in Foreign Policy](. A critic like Khashoggi would have been relatively little threat to a corrupt Saudi regime in a pre-internet age, [argues The Washington Post’s Anne Applebaum]( “The murders are the consequence of the clash between a 21st century technological revolution, which has made it possible to obtain and spread information in new ways, and a 21st century offshore banking revolution, which has made it possible to steal money in new ways, to hide it in new ways and to use it to maintain power.” In Mother Jones, [Russ Choma]( notes Trump’s many financial ties to Saudi Arabia, including investments in his businesses by the kingdom. “This all raises the question: Are Trump’s personal business interests influencing his handling of the unfolding diplomatic crisis?” writes Choma. The full Opinion report from The Times follows, including [a video]( arguing that it’s time to take seriously the threat of fascism in the United States. [As the Internet Splinters, the World Suffers]( Rose Wong By THE EDITORIAL BOARD A breakup of the web grants privacy, security and freedom to some, and not so much to others. From Our Columnists [Donald and the Deadly Deniers]( By PAUL KRUGMAN Climate policy is the ultimate example of Trumpian corruption. [The Rich White Civil War]( By DAVID BROOKS A smarter look at America’s divide. The Conversation [Will Trump Evade Hispanic Voters’ Wrath?]( By FRANK BRUNI AND ROSS DOUTHAT That could spoil Democratic dreams of a big blue wave. Contributing Op-Ed Writer [All the Good Beto Headlines Have Been Used]( By MIMI SWARTZ Does a much-covered Texas representative looking to unseat Ted Cruz stand a chance? And what if he — gulp — loses? Well, we’ve been here before. [If You’re Not Scared About Fascism in the U.S., You Should Be]( By JASON STANLEY, ADAM WESTBROOK AND JAPHET WEEKS When fascism starts to feel normal, we’re all in trouble. [The Shared Benefits of Affirmative Action]( By ROBERT RHEW As an Asian-American alumnus of Harvard, I know it’s incorrect to think of race-conscious admissions policies as helping just the lucky few. IN CASE YOU MISSED IT [What the Left Misses About Nationalism]( By JOHN B. JUDIS The perception of a common national identity is essential to democracies and to the modern welfare state. ADVERTISEMENT LIKE THIS EMAIL? Forward it to your friends, and let them know they can sign up here. Sears Files for Bankruptcy [The Billionaire Who Led Sears Into Bankruptcy Court]( By WILLIAM D. COHAN Financial engineers like Eddie Lampert are wreaking havoc on American companies. [How Sears Was the Amazon of Its Day]( By THE EDITORIAL BOARD It was a technological wonder — until the retail landscape changed and new innovation, and greedy owners, arrived. More in Opinion [One Way to Stay Cool]( By SHARON LERNER The Trump administration can decrease global warming by improving refrigerators and air-conditioners. [The Japanese Man Who Saved 6,000 Jews With His Handwriting]( By DAVID WOLPE What the astonishing Chiune Sugihara teaches us about moral heroism. [Think Professors Are Liberal? Try School Administrators]( By SAMUEL J. ABRAMS The ideological bent of those overseeing collegiate life is having the biggest impact on campus culture. [Packing the Supreme Court Is a Terrible Idea]( By JULIAN E. ZELIZER Democrats paid a political cost for decades after F.D.R. tried it in the 1930s. They probably would again. [Held Hostage by Health Insurance]( By KURT EICHENWALD Every career choice I made was determined by my epilepsy. If the Affordable Care Act is killed, I’ll be back in the same trap. [A Place for Ida B. Wells at Ole Miss]( By JEMAR TISBY The university should rename its school of journalism after this intrepid reporter. Fixes [The Lasting Pain of Children Sent to Orphanages, Rather Than Families]( By TINA ROSENBERG Many Americans travel to Latin America to help in orphanages, but their presence often only compounds the misery of unnecessarily institutionalizing children. SIGN UP FOR THE OP-DOCS NEWSLETTER Find out about new [Op-Docs]( read discussions with filmmakers and learn more about upcoming events. ADVERTISEMENT letters [Should the U.S. Cut Ties to Saudi Arabia?]( After the apparent killing of a Saudi dissident, some readers call on the U.S. to end its alliance, while another says “let’s get off our moral high horse.” HOW ARE WE DOING? We’d love your feedback on this newsletter. Please email thoughts and suggestions to [leonhardt@nytimes.com](mailto:leonhardt@nytimes.com?subject=Opinion%20Today%20Newsletter%20Feedback). FOLLOW OPINION [Facebook] [FACEBOOK]( [Twitter] [@nytopinion]( [Pinterest] [Pinterest]( Get more [NYTimes.com newsletters »](  | Get unlimited access to NYTimes.com and our NYTimes apps. [Subscribe »]( ABOUT THIS EMAIL You received this message because you signed up for NYTimes.com's Opinion Today newsletter. [Unsubscribe]( | [Manage Subscriptions]( | [Change Your Email]( | [Privacy Policy]( | [Contact]( | [Advertise]( Copyright 2018 The New York Times Company 620 Eighth Avenue New York, NY 10018

Marketing emails from nytimes.com

View More
Sent On

08/12/2024

Sent On

08/12/2024

Sent On

07/12/2024

Sent On

07/12/2024

Sent On

07/12/2024

Sent On

07/12/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.