Newsletter Subject

Opinion: The Senate’s white-state bonus

From

nytimes.com

Email Address

nytdirect@nytimes.com

Sent On

Mon, Oct 15, 2018 12:08 PM

Email Preheader Text

The last two weeks of polling have been good for the Republicans. View in | Add nytdirect@nytimes.co

The last two weeks of polling have been good for the Republicans. View in [Browser]( | Add nytdirect@nytimes.com to your address book. [The New York Times]( [The New York Times]( Monday, October 15, 2018 [NYTimes.com/Opinion »]( [David Leonhardt] David Leonhardt Op-Ed Columnist Here, in descending order, are the 10 whitest states in the country, based on share of the population: Maine, Vermont, West Virginia, New Hampshire, Montana, Iowa, Kentucky, North Dakota, Wyoming and South Dakota. You may notice that those states have something else in common, too. They’re small. And small states dominate the United States Senate, by design. Because the Senate gives special treatment to the residents of small states — in the form of extra political power — and because small states are overwhelmingly white, the Senate also effectively gives special treatment to white Americans. Yes, it’s partly historical accident. But the consequences are huge. The structure of our federal government awards more political representation to one race than to other races. This inequity is [the subject of my column today](. By now, you probably know that I’m a fan of charts, and this column includes a big chart that I think tells the story especially clearly. (Thanks to my colleague Sahil Chinoy, who edited the charts and the column.) As I argue, the Senate’s current white preferences are a strong argument for making Puerto Rico and Washington, D.C., the 51st and 52nd states. They’re both home to American citizens who now have no voting power in Congress. Both are also mostly non-white. Granting them statehood wouldn’t eliminate the Senate’s racial imbalance, but it would reduce it. For more on Puerto Rico and Washington in particular: The Washington Monthly has run several articles making the case for statehood for both places, including [one by Ben Paviour]( and a broader piece — on democratic reform — [by Paul Glastris](. “Since 1898, the United States has ruled the island as a colonial power,” [Rebecca Pilar Buckwalter-Poza has written in Washington Monthly](. “Puerto Ricans — all 3.3 million of them — are nominally American citizens, but have no representation in the federal government nor full constitutional protections.” “The disastrous response by the federal government to the hurricane in Puerto Rico is really example No. 1,”[ Glastris told Hill.TV’s Krystal Ball](. “If Puerto Rico were a state and had two senators, I can guarantee the federal government would not have been able to get away with the slow-walking of the response, and thousands of people might not have died.” “Hurricane survivors who live on the island agree that the federal government would have responded differently to the disaster if Puerto Rico were a US state,” [Alexia Fernández Campbell of Vox]( writes, citing survey data. And although some Puerto Ricans continue to oppose statehood, “all pre-Maria indications were that a majority of Puerto Ricans favored statehood,” as Rebecca Pilar Buckwalter-Poza has also written. Multiple former Republican presidents, [like Ronald Reagan]( also favored statehood for Puerto Rico if the island’s residents favored it. President Trump, however, is “[an absolute no.”]( [Ryan Struyk of CNN]( has some details on what statehood for Puerto Rico would mean in the House: Five seats currently held by other states would need to be reassigned to Puerto Rico, because the House, unlike the Senate, doesn’t grow when a new state joins. [The radio station WAMU]( explains how Washington could become a state despite the constitutional complications: A small part of the city would need to remain a “federal district” and not included in the new state. Jamal Khashoggi. “If we have already lost Jamal, then condemnation is not enough,” [Hatice Cengiz]( the fiancée of the apparently murdered journalist Jamal Khashoggi, writes in The Times. “The people who took him from us, irrespective of their political positions, must be held accountable and punished to the full extent of the law.” [Fred Hiatt]( who published Khashoggi’s columns at The Washington Post, argues that the killing should cause Americans to question its alliance with Saudi Arabia. “Even if we still needed Saudi Arabia’s oil, which we do not; even if Saudi Arabia was a strong and principled ally in the region, which it is not; even if it helped push the Palestinians toward peace, or kept its promises in Yemen, or bought the weapons that Trump thinks it is going to buy…. No matter what Saudi Arabia offered, could its supposed friendship be worth shrugging off the ensnaring and killing of a critic whose only offense was to tell the truth?” To follow the investigation, I recommend following [Karen Attiah]( who edited Khashoggi at The Post, on Twitter. The full Opinion report from The Times follows. [The Senate: Affirmative Action for White People]( [The Senate majority leader, Mitch McConnell, spoke at a press conference following a Republican luncheon at the Capitol last month.]( The Senate majority leader, Mitch McConnell, spoke at a press conference following a Republican luncheon at the Capitol last month. Shawn Thew/EPA, via Shutterstock By DAVID LEONHARDT And why it’s time to make Puerto Rico and Washington, D.C., the 51st and 52nd states. Op-Ed Columnist [Trump’s Callous Use of Kanye]( By CHARLES M. BLOW Trump never cared about criminal justice reform. [What the Left Misses About Nationalism]( By JOHN B. JUDIS The perception of a common national identity is essential to democracies and to the modern welfare state. [My Fiancé Jamal Khashoggi Was a Lonely Patriot]( [A protester held a picture of missing Saudi journalist Jamal Khashoggi during a demonstration in front of the Saudi consulate in Istanbul on Monday.]( A protester held a picture of missing Saudi journalist Jamal Khashoggi during a demonstration in front of the Saudi consulate in Istanbul on Monday. Tolga Bozoglu/EPA, via Shutterstock By HATICE CENGIZ His ideas will reverberate from Turkey to Saudi Arabia and beyond. Oppression never lasts forever. Tyrants eventually pay for their sins. More in Opinion [My War With the Algerian War]( By KAMEL DAOUD France finally recognizes its crimes. What does that mean for me, an Algerian in Algeria, today? [• Lire en français]( The Stone [The Fix for Fake News Isn’t Code. It’s Human.]( By REGINA RINI Technology has given rise to an age of misinformation. But philosophy, and a closer look at our own social behavior, could help eliminate it. [Is the Dollar Stronger Than Trump?]( By ESWAR PRASAD When the president undermines the rule of law and the independence of institutions like the Fed, he threatens a pillar of American economic strength. ADVERTISEMENT LIKE THIS EMAIL? Forward it to your friends, and let them know they can sign up here. Sunday Review Op-Ed Columnist [If a Prince Murders a Journalist, That’s Not a Hiccup]( By NICHOLAS KRISTOF In the end, Saudi Arabia played Kushner, Trump and his other American acolytes for suckers. Contributing Op-Ed Writer [Taylor Swift, the Grown-Up in the Room]( By MARGARET RENKL Tennessee progressives were unhappy with their options in a close Senate race. A 28-year-old pop star explained the stakes. news analysis [Is Trump on a Collision Course With Impeachment?]( By PETER BAKER Democrats are largely ducking the topic on the campaign trail, but few people in Washington doubt that it will be on the table if they win the House. [Harvard and the Myth of the Interchangeable Asian]( By LISA KO We’re mistaken for each other, but we’re not mistaken about ourselves. [It’s Getting Harder to Talk About God]( By JONATHAN MERRITT The decline in our spiritual vocabulary has many real-world consequences. SIGN UP FOR THE OP-DOCS NEWSLETTER Find out about new [Op-Docs]( read discussions with filmmakers and learn more about upcoming events. ADVERTISEMENT letters [Academic Journals Fooled by Bogus Scholarship]( Readers discuss a hoax involving 20 fake scholarly papers, many of which were published or accepted. HOW ARE WE DOING? We’d love your feedback on this newsletter. Please email thoughts and suggestions to [leonhardt@nytimes.com](mailto:leonhardt@nytimes.com?subject=Opinion%20Today%20Newsletter%20Feedback). FOLLOW OPINION [Facebook] [FACEBOOK]( [Twitter] [@nytopinion]( [Pinterest] [Pinterest]( Get more [NYTimes.com newsletters »](  | Get unlimited access to NYTimes.com and our NYTimes apps. [Subscribe »]( ABOUT THIS EMAIL You received this message because you signed up for NYTimes.com's Opinion Today newsletter. [Unsubscribe]( | [Manage Subscriptions]( | [Change Your Email]( | [Privacy Policy]( | [Contact]( | [Advertise]( Copyright 2018 The New York Times Company 620 Eighth Avenue New York, NY 10018

Marketing emails from nytimes.com

View More
Sent On

08/12/2024

Sent On

08/12/2024

Sent On

07/12/2024

Sent On

07/12/2024

Sent On

07/12/2024

Sent On

07/12/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.