Opinion: Amazon’s surrender is inspiring

How the country might return to a time when corporate executives rejected pure greed. View in [Browser]( | Add nytdirect@nytimes.com to your address book. [The New York Times]( [The New York Times]( Wednesday, October 3, 2018 [NYTimes.com/Opinion »]( [David Leonhardt] David Leonhardt Op-Ed Columnist There are two ways to fight [the long stagnation in living standards]( for most Americans. The first is probably the more obvious and the one I spend more time writing about: through government policy. The government can raise the minimum wage. It can [increase the Earned Income Tax Credit]( which is effectively a wage subsidy. It can cut taxes on the middle class. It can spend more money on education, child care and health care. All of these are good ideas. But they’re not the only way to lift living standards. For much of the past century, another approach has been even more important: As the economy grew, American companies paid workers their fair share of the growth. Until the mid-1970s or so, this was the norm. The middle class and poor received larger raises than the affluent, in percentage terms, during the three decades after World War II (as you can see [in this chart](. Labor unions played [a central role]( using their power to win raises for unionized and non-unionized members alike. And political pressure and cultural norms also mattered. Corporate executives [didn’t feel comfortable]( maximizing their own pay and their company’s profits at the expense of workers. How can the country return to a time when companies feel the need to pay a decent wage to their workers? Empowering labor unions would make a big difference, but unions aren’t likely to return to their previous strength. So it’s also important to look for other ways to put political pressure on corporate America. Which brings me to the story about Senator Bernie Sanders and Amazon. For months, Sanders has been criticizing the company for paying its workers too little. He went so far as to offer a bill called the “Stop BEZOS Act,” for Jeff Bezos, Amazon’s C.E.O. The bill was [deeply flawed]( but it still served to call more attention to the issue. Eventually, the criticism of the company started spreading to the political right, as [Jordan Weissmann of Slate points out](. All of this attention wasn’t pleasant for Amazon. It cares about its image. It’s in the middle of a high-profile process to open a second headquarters in a major city. Many of its executives, no doubt, [genuinely want]( both to earn a profit and to improve people’s lives — just as the executives in the mid-20th century did. Yesterday, as you probably heard, Amazon announced that it was raising its minimum hourly pay to $15. About 350,000 workers will receive an immediate raise as a result. Amazon also called on other companies to do the same and said it would lobby Washington to increase the federal minimum change. A tightening labor market no doubt contributed to Amazon’s decision, but politics — avoiding “the chance of regulations that pose a bigger cost down the road,” as [The Wall Street Journal’s Dan Gallagher wrote]( — was the main factor. This is how democracy and capitalism are supposed to work. “Jeff Bezos admitted a real degree of failure here and openly stated that the critics were right and he was wrong,” [wrote Shaun King]( the writer and Black Lives Matter activist. “Thank you @SenSanders,” [tweeted John Podesta]( Hillary Clinton’s former campaign chairman. Bezos thanked Sanders yesterday as well, in[ a Twitter exchange](. For more on the importance of changing corporate behavior, I recommend [a recent book by Peter Georgescu]( the former C.E.O. of a major advertising agency, as well as [coverage]( [analysis]( of Senator Elizabeth Warren’s [new legislation]( on this topic. Trump’s tax fraud. If you’re a subscriber to The Times and you’re feeling angry this morning about President Trump’s brazen tax cheating — as uncovered by [a long Times investigation]( — I know how you feel. But I would also encourage you to make room to feel a small bit of pride, as well. A long journalistic investigation, involving multiple reporters and editors, is expensive. The reason my colleagues in the newsroom are able to pursue such projects is because of [the financial support of subscribers](. All of us who work here are grateful for that support. Among the reactions to the investigation: “If you’re wondering how Trump managed to evade the tax authorities for so long, given the brazen acts reported in that NYT piece, note that we’ve basically stopped prosecuting white-collar crime and tax evasion,” [tweeted The Washington Post’s Catherine Rampell](. “Most if not all of the transactions detailed in The Times can be pursued as civil tax fraud by both the federal and New York state governments,” argues [David Cay Johnston]( a reporter who has covered Trump’s finances for years. “What we need now are serious investigations by Congress, by the IRS and by New York state and city tax authorities.” At a rally last night, Trump mocked Christine Blasey Ford, who has accused his Supreme Court nominee of sexual assault. As [The Atlantic’s Ronald Brownstein put it]( Trump “stoked his base w/a new culture war (over sexual assault & growing assertiveness by women) at least partly to distract from airtight evidence he abused the tax code to benefit the super rich (himself). In that way he encapsulated his presidency in a single night.” And as [The Times’s editorial board writes]( Trump’s lie-fueled rise has a lot in common with his presidency. “Trump’s willingness to bend the truth — and the rules — in the service of his myth looks less like innocent exaggeration than malicious deception, with a dollop of corruption tossed in for good measure.” The full Opinion report follows. [Donald Trump and the Self-Made Sham]( Tom Brenner for The New York Times By THE EDITORIAL BOARD Now let’s see your tax returns, Mr. President. From Our Columnists [The American Civil War, Part II]( By THOMAS L. FRIEDMAN The nation is deeply divided, with each side seeing the other as “the enemy.” [The Meritocracy Against Itself]( By ROSS DOUTHAT How Ivy League resentments took over the Kavanaugh debate. [Sorry, President Trump, Decency Beats Dollars]( By FRANK BRUNI A blue wave in the midterms would be a validation of the best American values. [A Bad Move That Exposes Kids to Chemicals]( Marta Monteiro By PHILIP J. LANDRIGAN AND LYNN R. GOLDMAN Without explaining why, the E.P.A. has sidelined its top children’s health advocate. The Stone [Misogyny Rules: A War of Two Worlds]( By BONNIE MANN The battle over the Kavanaugh hearings is not about truth. It is about meaning. Contributing Op-Ed Writer [Russian Meddling Is a Symptom, Not the Disease]( By ZEYNEP TUFEKCI Less worrisome than foreign interference in our elections is how companies like Facebook profit from our domestic political polarization. ADVERTISEMENT LIKE THIS EMAIL? Forward it to your friends, and let them know they can sign up here. Op-Docs [A First Glimpse of Our Magnificent Earth, Seen From the Moon]( By EMMANUEL VAUGHAN-LEE The first people to view our planet from the moon were transformed by the experience. In this film, they tell their story. [Am I a Lawn Mower Parent?]( Jen Wang By JENNIFER FINNEY BOYLAN We need to let kids learn to be tough. But we also need to show them love. More in Opinion [The Right-Wing Rot at the Heart of the German State]( By THOMAS MEANEY AND SASKIA SCHÄFER Recent events make clear that extremists have allies deep inside the government. [Trump’s Reckless Cybersecurity Strategy]( By JOSEPHINE WOLFF The administration’s new policy of striking first at online attackers might invite cyberattacks, not deter them. Loose Ends [The United Texts of America]( By KATE GREATHEAD AND TEDDY WAYNE We’ll be hearing from the president. Here’s how that might go. SIGN UP FOR THE OP-DOCS NEWSLETTER Find out about new [Op-Docs]( read discussions with filmmakers and learn more about upcoming events. ADVERTISEMENT letters [Concerns About Kavanaugh’s Temperament]( Readers discuss the judge’s anger at his hearing, his encounter with the New Haven police and whether he is unjustly being made a “sacrificial lamb.” HOW ARE WE DOING? We’d love your feedback on this newsletter. Please email thoughts and suggestions to [leonhardt@nytimes.com](mailto:leonhardt@nytimes.com?subject=Opinion%20Today%20Newsletter%20Feedback). FOLLOW OPINION [Facebook] [FACEBOOK]( [Twitter] [@nytopinion]( [Pinterest] [Pinterest]( Get more [NYTimes.com newsletters »](  | Get unlimited access to NYTimes.com and our NYTimes apps. [Subscribe »]( ABOUT THIS EMAIL You received this message because you signed up for NYTimes.com's Opinion Today newsletter. [Unsubscribe]( | [Manage Subscriptions]( | [Change Your Email]( | [Privacy Policy]( | [Contact]( | [Advertise]( Copyright 2018 The New York Times Company 620 Eighth Avenue New York, NY 10018