Newsletter Subject

Opinion: Brexit is the new Obamacare

From

nytimes.com

Email Address

nytdirect@nytimes.com

Sent On

Fri, Jul 13, 2018 11:56 AM

Email Preheader Text

Trump exports his magical thinking to Britain. View in | Add nytdirect@nytimes.com to your address b

Trump exports his magical thinking to Britain. View in [Browser]( | Add nytdirect@nytimes.com to your address book. [The New York Times]( [The New York Times]( Friday, July 13, 2018 [NYTimes.com/Opinion »]( [David Leonhardt] David Leonhardt Op-Ed Columnist I’ve been thinking this week about the subtle similarities between the debates over Brexit and Obamacare. And then yesterday President Trump went and made those similarities blazingly obvious. He did so while breaching every known custom of diplomacy (and basic manners) by criticizing Theresa May, the British prime minister, while he was in Britain. Specifically, he suggested she could have gotten a better deal when negotiating her country’s planned exit from the European Union if she had taken a harder line. “I would have done it much differently,” Mr. Trump said, according to [the tabloid The Sun](. “I actually told Theresa May how to do it, but she didn’t listen to me.” Ah, yes — the magical great deal on Brexit. The truth is, there is no great deal to be had. During the 2016 lead-up to a referendum on the issue, the pro-Brexit crowd sold a fantasy to the British people: that their country could somehow keep the benefits of European trade (easily selling products in other countries, for example) while getting rid of the downsides (like agreeing to continentwide rules). Along the way, these Brexiteers also exaggerated those downsides and sometimes flat-out lied about them. [My colleague Paul Krugman]( and [The New Yorker’s John Cassidy]( both wrote nice explanations, with much more detail, this week. By now, you’ve probably figured out the similarities to the Obamacare debate. After the law went into effect in 2010, Republicans [spent years lying about health care](. They pretended they could pass a magical law that somehow made medical care better and cheaper than it already was, without ever explaining how it would work. Those falsehoods worked pretty well politically. They helped Republicans retake control of Congress and then helped Trump win the White House. But when it came time to pass a health care bill, the party didn’t have a serious plan. All of its bills would have made medical care [worse and more expensive]( according to every independent analysis. In the end, Republicans couldn’t pass a bill. Yesterday, Trump brought his version of magical thinking to Britain and used it to insult his host. Related. “Essentially, the Trump administration views Britain as an easy economic mark, not a strategic partner,” writes [the Brookings Institution’s Thomas Wright in Politico Magazine](. “Trump’s interview is a bombshell that fully confirms the predatory policy analysis,” Wright later [tweeted](. Besides humiliating and patronizing May, [notes The Guardian’s Pippa Crerar]( Trump’s remarks throw a “hand grenade under her new Brexit plans.” And by championing a maximalist fantasy version of Brexit and emboldening her domestic political rivals, “Trump has essentially backed May into a corner,” [writes Vanity Fair’s Isobel Thompson](. A more responsible American administration would try to iron out the tensions between Britain and the E.U. — even just to protect its own strategic interests. But “rather than soothe difficulties between the U.K. and EU, the Trump administration has inflamed them,” [writes The Atlantic’s David Frum](. In The Times, [Lara Prendergast]( [William Davies]( and [Michael Kenny and Nick Pearce]( offer their thoughts on Britain and Trump. The full Opinion report from The Times follows, including [Michiko Kakutani]( on her family’s history of internment and her fear that history is repeating itself. Trump in Britain [Boris Johnson, Donald Trump and the Rise of Radical Incompetence]( By WILLIAM DAVIES Like America’s president, Brexiteers resent the very idea of governing as complex and based in facts. [Britain, Time to Let Go of the ‘Anglosphere’]( By MICHAEL KENNY AND NICK PEARCE The other members of this outdated idea of family couldn’t care less. In Case You Missed It [Like Brexit, but More Orange]( By LARA PRENDERGAST Britons are amassing to protest President Trump’s visit. And to do a little bit of projecting. And then on to Helsinki [Susan Rice: Trump Must Not Capitulate to Putin]( By SUSAN E. RICE There is so much to lose and so little to gain for the United States in the Trump-Putin summit next week. [The Art of Containing Trump (and Putin)]( By STEPHEN SESTANOVICH Trump’s bumptious, backslapping summit style just might work with Putin — if he leaves the actual negotiating to his underlings. [Ask Putin About the Nerve Agents]( By DAVID WISE The Novichok poisonings in Britain show that President Trump needs to push his Russian counterpart to comply with the Chemical Weapons Convention it signed. From Our Columnists Op-Ed Columnist [For Trump, Failure Is the Only Option]( By PAUL KRUGMAN He doesn’t want to fix international institutions, just destroy them. [Football Isn’t Coming Home After All]( By ROGER COHEN An average English team lifted by a superb defense is undone by the midfield geniuses of Croatia. [The Quiet Death of Racial Progress]( By DAVID BROOKS How can we stop backsliding toward inequality? [Trump Got From NATO Everything Obama Ever Asked For]( By THE EDITORIAL BOARD But alliance members leave Brussels bruised and confused. LIKE THIS EMAIL? Forward it to your friends, and let them know they can sign up [here](. ADVERTISEMENT [When America Incarcerated My Family]( Illustration by Mike McQuade; Photographs by Dorothea Lange/War Relocation Authority and Mike Blake/Reuters By MICHIKO KAKUTANI In 1942, my mother, her parents and sister were sent to an internment camp by the U.S. government. I worry that history is repeating itself. More in Opinion [This Russian Company Knows What You Like on Facebook]( By SIVA VAIDHYANATHAN The social media site revealed that it gave a Kremlin-linked company access to years of user data. You are right to be scared. [No, Democrats Aren’t Ruining Their Midterm Chances]( By MATT GROSSMANN AND DAVID A. HOPKINS American history demonstrates that party conflict does not necessarily hurt electoral success. [Trump and the Return of Divine Right]( By DAVID ARMITAGE In deploying his pardon power freely and using the Bible to justify family separation, the president is exactly the sort of ruler that Enlightenment thinkers feared. [Ending the Dead-End-Job Trap]( By TERRI GERSTEIN AND SHARON BLOCK State attorneys general are cracking down on businesses that prohibit their franchisees from hiring workers away from one another. [I’ll Be Out in the Garden, De-stressing]( By HUMA YASIN Health — professional, physical, spiritual or mental — requires constant attention. And soil, it turns out, is an antidepressant. [Ocasio-Cortez Isn’t Spelled C-r-o-w-l-e-y]( By THE EDITORIAL BOARD New York’s arcane election laws keep a defeated incumbent on the ballot. [Is the G.O.P. Following Jim Jordan Over a Cliff?]( By THE EDITORIAL BOARD Republican lawmakers’ combative defense of the Ohio congressman could cost them. [Hurricane Maria Killed Our Loved Ones. We Want Closure.]( By LEAH VARJACQUES, MATTEEN MOKALLA AND JAPHET WEEKS The 2017 hurricane killed 70 times more people in Puerto Rico than the official estimate. As relatives of unrecognized victims, how can we begin to heal? SIGN UP FOR OUR WORLD CUP NEWSLETTER Read [arguments and opinions]( on the social, political and economic issues around the World Cup, for football buffs and fair-weather fans alike. ADVERTISEMENT Letters [Trump’s Bullying Tactics at the NATO Meeting]( Readers discuss his attacks on Angela Merkel and Germany. One points out that women leaders are his favorite targets. HOW ARE WE DOING? We’d love your feedback on this newsletter. Please email thoughts and suggestions to [leonhardt@nytimes.com](mailto:leonhardt@nytimes.com?subject=Opinion%20Today%20Newsletter%20Feedback). FOLLOW OPINION [Facebook] [FACEBOOK]( [Twitter] [@nytopinion]( [Pinterest] [Pinterest]( Get more [NYTimes.com newsletters »](  | Get unlimited access to NYTimes.com and our NYTimes apps. [Subscribe »]( ABOUT THIS EMAIL You received this message because you signed up for NYTimes.com's Opinion Today newsletter. [Unsubscribe]( | [Manage Subscriptions]( | [Change Your Email]( | [Privacy Policy]( | [Contact]( | [Advertise]( Copyright 2018 The New York Times Company 620 Eighth Avenue New York, NY 10018

Marketing emails from nytimes.com

View More
Sent On

08/12/2024

Sent On

08/12/2024

Sent On

07/12/2024

Sent On

07/12/2024

Sent On

07/12/2024

Sent On

07/12/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.