Newsletter Subject

Opinion: Talk tough, and weaken America

From

nytimes.com

Email Address

nytdirect@nytimes.com

Sent On

Wed, May 9, 2018 12:00 PM

Email Preheader Text

Also: Bret Stephens defends the withdrawal from the Iran deal. View in | Add nytdirect@nytimes.com t

Also: Bret Stephens defends the withdrawal from the Iran deal. View in [Browser]( | Add nytdirect@nytimes.com to your address book. [The New York Times]( [The New York Times]( Wednesday, May 9, 2018 [NYTimes.com/Opinion »]( [David Leonhardt] David Leonhardt Op-Ed Columnist There is a theme to President Trump’s foreign policy: Talk tough, and weaken America’s global standing. It’s virtually the opposite of Theodore Roosevelt’s famous line, “Speak softly and carry a big stick.” In Asia, for example, Trump’s withdrawal from a trade pact has [thrilled China’s leaders]( clearing the way for China to increase its regional influence at the expense of the United States. Yesterday, of course, Trump announced he was withdrawing from the Iran nuclear deal. The decision horrified America’s closest allies. Our enemies and rivals, on the other hand, are quite pleased. “I don’t see any way Iran hardliners aren’t going to take this as a big win,” [tweeted]( Melissa Hanham of the Middlebury Institute of International Studies. The withdrawal probably won’t set off “an immediate emergency,” Ilan Goldenberg and Ariane Tabatabai [writeÂ]( Slate](. Rather, Iran will likely resume its pre-deal nuclear activities incrementally. At some point, America and its allies will have a choice: “accepting a nuclear-armed Iran or pursuing military action” to stop it. This is why Trump’s move is an enormous risk. It’s an attempt to weaken the Iranian government in the hopes that a “stable, well-functioning, and pro-American” one will replace it, [Stephen Walt explains in Foreign Policy](. But reneging on the deal undermines Iran’s more moderate politicians — including its current president, Hassan Rouhani — who backed negotiations. In The Times, the editorial board notes that Trump keeps blowing up Obama administration deals — on trade, climate change and now Iran — and promising to improve them. But “so far, again and again, he has shown himself to be adept at destroying agreements — a relatively easy task for a president — and utterly lacking in the policy depth or strategic vision and patience to create new ones,” [the]( board writes](. Trump’s decision was a “reckless gamble” and “an act of utter petulance,” writes my colleague [Roger Cohen]( [Nick Kristof]( asks: “Why destroy a deal that is working, other than to dismantle some of Obama’s legacy?” And if you want to read a vigorous defense of Trump’s move, which I encourage you to do, [try Bret Stephens’s column](. Bret writes: “The goal is to put Iran’s rulers to a fundamental choice. They can opt to have a functioning economy, free of sanctions and open to investment, at the price of permanently, verifiably and irreversibly forgoing a nuclear option and abandoning their support for terrorists. Or they can pursue their nuclear ambitions at the cost of economic ruin and possible war. But they are no longer entitled to Barack Obama’s sweetheart deal of getting sanctions lifted first, retaining their nuclear options for later, and sponsoring terrorism throughout.” Election night. Several states held primaries last night, and the more extreme, less electable candidates — on both sides — generally lost. To put it another way, the primary candidates whom the other party was rooting against mostly won. There was an exception. In south-central North Carolina, an incumbent Republican congressman, Robert Pittenger, lost his primary to Rev. Mark Harris, a pastor. The result, [writes the elections analyst G. Elliott Morris]( “means that it is an open contest in November. Without the GOP incumbency advantage, Democrats’ prospects increase from 20 percent chance of winning to a 45 percent shot.” The full Opinion report from The Times follows. On the Iran Deal [Where’s That Better Deal, Mr. Trump?]( By THE EDITORIAL BOARD Now he promises a better deal with Iran. The American people are already waiting for him to deliver on a string of such promises. Op-Ed Columnist [A Courageous Trump Call on a Lousy Iran Deal]( By BRET STEPHENS Now we’ll see whether the administration is capable of following through. Op-Ed Columnist [Trump Vandalizes the Iran Deal]( By NICHOLAS KRISTOF The president is isolating the United States, not Iran, and increasing the risk of war. Op-Ed Columnist [Trump to Iran: America’s Word is Worthless]( By ROGER COHEN Withdrawing from the nuclear deal harms America and its allies and could ignite the Middle East. Contributing Op-Ed Writer [Trump’s Most Foolish Decision Yet]( By SUSAN E. RICE The Iran nuclear deal has worked as intended. Violating it will make the United States far less safe. From Our Columnists Op-Ed Columnist [The U.S. and China: More Alike Than We’d Like?]( By THOMAS L. FRIEDMAN The similarities in government propaganda, toeing the ruling party’s line and political self-censorship are disturbing. Op-Ed Columnist [Make Catholicism Weird Again]( By ROSS DOUTHAT The Met Gala and the future of the church. Op-Ed Columnist [How Many Funerals Will Donald Trump Have to Skip?]( By FRANK BRUNI We have a president so proudly offensive that his last respects are spoiled goods. What You Need to Know About Gina Haspel [I Have a Few Questions for Gina Haspel]( By FATIMA BOUDCHAR I was tortured at a C.I.A. black site in Thailand. Will you let it happen again? [Lawyers Told Gina Haspel Torture Was Legal. But It Never Was.]( By CLAIRE FINKELSTEIN AND STEPHEN N. XENAKIS The Senate must hold the C.I.A. nominee accountable for the harsh treatment of detainees under her watch and for destroying evidence of torture. [America Doesn’t Need Gina Haspel. We Need a Debate on Torture.]( By ARIEL DORFMAN Whether the Senate confirms Ms. Haspel as the director of the C.I.A. or not, the United States needs a conversation about torture and rendition. LIKE THIS EMAIL? Forward it to your friends, and let them know they can sign up [here](. ADVERTISEMENT On Eric Schneiderman Contributing Op-Ed Writer [The Problem With ‘Feminist’ Men]( By JILL FILIPOVIC At work, Eric Schneiderman championed women. At home, his exes say, the opposite was true. [The Wreckage Schneiderman Leaves Behind]( By THE EDITORIAL BOARD New Yorkers deserve the chance to choose a law enforcement leader who will be honest, independent and moral. More in Opinion [What Is Kim Jong-un’s Game?]( By JEAN-PIERRE CABESTAN North Korea is making overtures to South Korea to get closer to America and keep China in check. [Tech’s Race Problem Beyond the Numbers]( By BÄRÍ A. WILLIAMS When it comes to the relationship between Silicon Valley companies and communities of color, hiring isn’t the only issue. [Stop Enslavement of Venezuelan Refugees in Brazil]( By CHRIS FELICIANO ARNOLD Labor rights of immigrants are not high on this year’s electoral agenda, yet voters can be receptive to leaders willing to bring criminals to justice. [Why Are So Many Democracies Breaking Down?]( By MICHAEL ALBERTUS AND VICTOR MENALDO The roots of backslides to authoritarianism reside in democratic constitutions themselves. [Michigan’s Discriminatory Work Requirements]( By NICHOLAS BAGLEY AND ELI SAVIT Medicaid beneficiaries in white rural counties and black cities are not being considered equally. Disability [In My Mother’s Eyes, and Mine]( By CATHERINE KUDLICK I was finally ready to stop pretending that I could see like everybody else. Mom wasn’t. HOW ARE WE DOING? We’d love your feedback on this newsletter. Please email thoughts and suggestions to [leonhardt@nytimes.com](mailto:leonhardt@nytimes.com?subject=Opinion%20Today%20Newsletter%20Feedback). ADVERTISEMENT Letters [Trump’s Exit From the Iran Nuclear Accord]( Readers criticize the decision, worrying that it makes the world less safe and jeopardizes a deal with North Korea. Letters [Eric Schneiderman’s Downfall After Abuse Charges]( Readers react to the scandal involving New York’s attorney general. SIGN UP FOR THE OP-DOCS NEWSLETTER Find out about new [Op-Docs]( read discussions with filmmakers and learn more about upcoming events. FOLLOW OPINION [Facebook] [FACEBOOK]( [Twitter] [@nytopinion]( [Pinterest] [Pinterest]( Get more [NYTimes.com newsletters »](  | Get unlimited access to NYTimes.com and our NYTimes apps. [Subscribe »]( ABOUT THIS EMAIL You received this message because you signed up for NYTimes.com's Opinion Today newsletter. [Unsubscribe]( | [Manage Subscriptions]( | [Change Your Email]( | [Privacy Policy]( | [Contact]( | [Advertise]( Copyright 2018 The New York Times Company 620 Eighth Avenue New York, NY 10018

Marketing emails from nytimes.com

View More
Sent On

08/12/2024

Sent On

08/12/2024

Sent On

07/12/2024

Sent On

07/12/2024

Sent On

07/12/2024

Sent On

07/12/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.