Newsletter Subject

Opinion: Trump’s pro-swindle banking policy

From

nytimes.com

Email Address

nytdirect@nytimes.com

Sent On

Thu, Apr 26, 2018 12:06 PM

Email Preheader Text

Mick Mulvaney tells the truth. View in | Add nytdirect@nytimes.com to your address book. Thursday, A

Mick Mulvaney tells the truth. View in [Browser]( | Add nytdirect@nytimes.com to your address book. [The New York Times]( [The New York Times]( Thursday, April 26, 2018 [NYTimes.com/Opinion »]( [David Leonhardt] David Leonhardt Op-Ed Columnist Mick Mulvaney, the Trump administration’s budget director, made news this week by committing what’s known as [a Kinsley gaffe]( Mulvaney told the truth. Describing the behavior of himself and his staff during his years in Congress, Mulvaney said: “If you’re a lobbyist who never gave us money, I didn’t talk to you. If you’re a lobbyist who gave us money, I might talk to you.” Lovely, eh? “It is hard to decide what is the worse thing here,” The Washington Post’s Jennifer Rubin [writes]( “Mulvaney’s pay-to-play operation, his shamelessness in bragging about it or Republicans’ utter indifference to it.” The attention to that comment drowned out nearly everything else that Mulvaney said at a conference of bank executives on Tuesday. But the rest of his remarks deserve some scrutiny, too. Mulvaney isn’t just the budget director. He is also the interim director of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, the banking watchdog that the Obama administration and Elizabeth Warren created after the financial crisis. The bureau, often called the C.F.P.B., has had an impressive record since its founding, curtailing abusive lending practices by banks, among other things. It’s helped level the playing field — not all the way, to be sure — between big, powerful companies and American families. But Mulvaney has set out to dismantle the C.F.P.B. He has, [as The Times reports]( “frozen all new investigations and slowed down existing inquiries by requiring employees to produce detailed justifications” and “scaled back efforts to go after payday lenders, auto lenders and other financial services companies accused of preying on the vulnerable.” On Tuesday, he took another step, telling gleeful banking executives that he was interested in shutting down a public database where people can lodge complaints against financial companies. Bureau officials had used the database to figure out when they needed to investigate a company and to gather evidence. Mulvaney dismissively referred to it as “a Yelp for financial services sponsored by the federal government.” Aaron Klein of the Brookings Institution [told The Wall Street Journal’s Yuka Hayashi]( that the database was “an incredibly important tool that empowers consumers.” Finally, in the pettiest move of all, Mulvaney said he would change the order of the words in the bureau’s name — to the bulkier “Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection.” Administration officials acknowledged to The Times that the move was meant “to diminish the agency’s public profile.” It also seems like an unsubtle attempt to erase the old C.F.P.B. from everyone’s memory. The whole episode fits a Trump administration pattern. In describing his behavior with lobbyists, Mulvaney did something outrageous and worthy of attention. And yet he also managed to divert attention from policies doing real damage to Americans. Jobs skepticism. [In my column this week]( I mentioned the idea of having the federal government play a more aggressive role in creating good jobs. [Jonathan Chait of New York magazine argues]( that the current proposals to do so are poorly conceived and full of flaws. This kind of criticism is vital. As I wrote in the column, the success of any big, bold economic idea will depend on the details. Obamacare has worked [as well as it has]( in large part because policy experts spent years thinking about, and arguing about, the details. In The Times, the University of Rhode Island’s Erik Loomis has [a more positive take]( “The implementation of a federal employment guarantee would consist of difficult compromises, power struggles and policy corrections. But it also provides the most politically realistic answer to our future employment crisis.” The full Opinion report from The Times follows. From Our Columnists Op-Ed Columnist [Bush 41, Trump, and American Decline]( By BRET STEPHENS The two Republican presidents are a study in contrasts, each with a profound effect on our country. Op-Ed Columnist [Why Does Trump Treat Immigrant Kids Cruelly? Because He Can]( By NICHOLAS KRISTOF The administration is fine with taking children away from their parents. Op-Ed Columnist [A New Mitt or the Same Old Weenie?]( By GAIL COLLINS The world’s excited to know Mitt Romney’s still around. Contributing Op-Ed Writer [Meet the New Boss. Actually Quite Different From the Old Boss.]( By THOMAS B. EDSALL President Trump has overturned the Republican establishment, but at what cost? Contributing Op-Ed Writer [Ronny Jackson Shouldn’t Head the V.A. Should He Even Be Practicing Medicine?]( By RICHARD A. FRIEDMAN He’s been accused of handing drugs out like candy, to people whose medical histories he probably knew nothing about. Contributing Op-Ed Writer [The Supreme Court and the New Civil War]( By LINDA GREENHOUSE The battle between the White House and blue states raises questions about the limits of federal authority. Contributing Op-Ed Writer [‘Fightin’ to Keep Slavery’]( By KASHANA CAULEY A common refrain among conservatives is that black people should get over it. Even though conservatives refuse to. [We Are Republican Teachers Striking in Arizona. It’s Time to Raise Taxes.]( Ross D. Franklin/Associated Press By LEAH VARJACQUES, TAIGE JENSEN AND JAPHET WEEKS We’re angry: Our classrooms are falling apart. We work multiple jobs. Our party must stop its war on public education. Editorial [Trump’s ‘Best People’ Are the Worst]( By THE EDITORIAL BOARD What a cast of characters this White House has managed to recruit. LIKE THIS EMAIL? Forward it to your friends, and let them know they can sign up [here](. ADVERTISEMENT Editorial Observer [So the South’s White Terror Will Never Be Forgotten]( By BRENT STAPLES A new memorial and museum in Montgomery, Ala., bring attention to a disturbing chapter of the nation’s history — one that in some ways lives on. Editorial Observer [At This Memorial, the Monuments Bleed]( By JESSE WEGMAN Rain drips blood-red from the rusted steel columns that hang from the ceiling, commemorating the thousands of lynchings of black Americans. Contributing Op-Ed Writer [Who Will Win the New Great Game?]( By JOCHEN BITTNER The West is not in a new Cold War. It’s an old-fashioned fight with China and Russia for power and influence. Op-Ed Contributor [Robert Mueller’s Last Resort]( By JOHN N. TYE AND MARK S. ZAID There are legal ways to disclose classified information. If we face a constitutional crisis, Mueller and his staff should take advantage of them. Op-Ed Contributor [North Korea’s Phony Peace Ploy]( By NICHOLAS EBERSTADT If the past is any guide, Pyongyang will offer Seoul unenforceable verbiage at this week’s summit meeting. Op-Ed Contributor [Facebook Released Its Content Moderation Rules. Now What?]( By KATE KLONICK As an essential platform for speech, the company owes users due process. Op-Ed Contributor [How to Leave MS-13 Alive]( By STEVEN DUDLEY Gang members who left the notorious gang by embracing God give us clues about how to mitigate its influence. Op-Ed Contributor [The Case for a Federal Jobs Guarantee]( By ERIK LOOMIS Democrats are getting behind an old idea to face new challenges of technologic disruption in the work force. HOW ARE WE DOING? We’d love your feedback on this newsletter. Please email thoughts and suggestions to [leonhardt@nytimes.com](mailto:leonhardt@nytimes.com?subject=Opinion%20Today%20Newsletter%20Feedback). ADVERTISEMENT Letters [Feuding Politicians: Cuomo and de Blasio]( Readers criticize two New Yorkers for feuding instead of fixing transit and other problems. One offers them two words of advice: “Grow up!” SIGN UP FOR THE OP-DOCS NEWSLETTER Find out about new [Op-Docs]( read discussions with filmmakers and learn more about upcoming events. FOLLOW OPINION [Facebook] [FACEBOOK]( [Twitter] [@nytopinion]( [Pinterest] [Pinterest]( Get more [NYTimes.com newsletters »](  | Get unlimited access to NYTimes.com and our NYTimes apps. [Subscribe »]( ABOUT THIS EMAIL You received this message because you signed up for NYTimes.com's Opinion Today newsletter. [Unsubscribe]( | [Manage Subscriptions]( | [Change Your Email]( | [Privacy Policy]( | [Contact]( | [Advertise]( Copyright 2018 The New York Times Company 620 Eighth Avenue New York, NY 10018

Marketing emails from nytimes.com

View More
Sent On

08/12/2024

Sent On

08/12/2024

Sent On

07/12/2024

Sent On

07/12/2024

Sent On

07/12/2024

Sent On

07/12/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.