Newsletter Subject

Nicholas Kristof: Why 2017 Was the Best Year Ever!

From

nytimes.com

Email Address

nytdirect@nytimes.com

Sent On

Sat, Jan 6, 2018 08:33 PM

Email Preheader Text

Some good news in the gloom View in | Add nytdirect@nytimes.com to your address book. Saturday, Janu

Some good news in the gloom View in [Browser]( | Add nytdirect@nytimes.com to your address book. [The New York Times]( [The New York Times]( Saturday, January 6, 2018 [NYTimes.com/Kristof »]( [Why 2017 Was the Best Year Ever!]( [Readers sometimes think I’m the Eeyore of journalists, but actually there’s good news to share.]( Readers sometimes think I’m the Eeyore of journalists, but actually there’s good news to share. Gordon Welters for The New York Times It’s time for [my happy column]( But first, happy new year! Everybody is feeling a bit bleak, what with the circus in Washington, clowns with nuclear weapons, and a deep freeze in much of the U.S. So I thought for [my opening column]( of the year I would try to provide a bit of perspective: For all of the problems, last year was the best year in the history of humanity. I know that’s not what the headlines say, but consider that a smaller share of people starved last year, were poor or illiterate, were disfigured or blinded by disease, or simply lived in extreme poverty than at any point since our species emerged. Today, another 300,000 people will gain access to electricity. We may think we’re living in the worst of times, but consider that when I was a kid, a majority of humans had always been illiterate and living in subsistence poverty — and both extreme poverty and illiteracy will be pretty much wiped out in the next 15 years. So, sure, President Trump gives us plenty of reason to sweat (such as the risk of a nuclear war!), but it’s also important to step back and acknowledge that we are privileged to live in an extraordinary epoch of stunning human progress. In place of Prozac, [here’s my column](. :) One of the most gratifying things to me as a columnist is the way readers respond to some of my columns. I noted in my recent list of my [least-read columns of 2017]( that my [holiday giving guide]( didn’t do well, but one of the charities I highlighted, [MiracleFeet]( which corrects clubfoot, told me that the column had raised more than $240,000 for the organization. That’s a lot of kids who will have their clubfoot corrected. Plus, a donor who had been wavering decided after the column to provide $780,000 for clubfoot. So thanks to all readers for being so generous! We’ve all been staggered by the [Michael Wolff book]( and the reaction to it. I think the Wolff book is marred by some sloppy mistakes but still powerfully conveys basic and disturbing truths that by now are pretty much self-evident: Trump is poorly informed, emotionally unstable, and only lightly controlled by the grown-ups around him. That was all confirmed by his reaction to the book, such as the savaging of Bannon and the attempt to prevent publication, which only increased sales. On issues like the Bannon relationship, the immaturity and instability are salacious reading, but on issues like North Korea, they are profoundly dangerous. Speaking of North Korea, [here’s an essay]( I did for the Times Book Review about the best books about North Korea. And on that ominous note, we need a moment of perspective more than ever. As F. Scott Fitzgerald said, the test of a first-rate intelligence is the ability to hold two contradictory thoughts at the same time. So [here’s my column]( on why 2017 was the best year in human history. [Read!]( ADVERTISEMENT I welcome suggestions for what to include in this newsletter. You can connect with me on [Twitter]( [Facebook]( [Google]( [Instagram]( and [Pinterest](. If you have friends who might enjoy this newsletter, forward this email; they can [sign up here](. Send feedback or tech questions to newsletters@nytimes.com. Recent Columns [Cardinal Tobin, Am I a Christian?]( Nicholas Kristof put blunt questions to Cardinal Joseph Tobin of Newark. [My Worst Columns]( People loved some of my columns in 2017. But not these. [Several hundred protesters outside the White House on Wednesday chanted, “No hate, no fear, trans students are welcome here.”]( Nicole Sganga [My Blog]( My blog, On the Ground, expands on my twice-weekly columns, sharing thoughts that shape the writing but don’t always make it into the 800-word text. It also features contributions from other writers. [Several hundred protesters outside the White House on Wednesday chanted, “No hate, no fear, trans students are welcome here.”](  [My Columns]( Explore a searchable collection of my previous columns dating back to 2001. ADVERTISEMENT FOLLOW NICHOLAS KRISTOF [Facebook] [FACEBOOK]( [Twitter] [@nickkristof]( [Instagram] [nickkristof]( Get more [NYTimes.com newsletters »]( | Get unlimited access to NYTimes.com and our NYTimes apps. [Subscribe »]( ABOUT THIS EMAIL You received this message because you signed up for NYTimes.com's Nicholas Kristof newsletter. [Unsubscribe]( | [Manage Subscriptions]( | [Change Your Email]( | [Privacy Policy]( | [Contact]( | [Advertise]( Copyright 2018 The New York Times Company 620 Eighth Avenue New York, NY 10018

Marketing emails from nytimes.com

View More
Sent On

30/05/2024

Sent On

30/05/2024

Sent On

30/05/2024

Sent On

30/05/2024

Sent On

30/05/2024

Sent On

30/05/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2024 SimilarMail.