Newsletter Subject

What We're Reading: Mueller suspicions, another tech narrative and more

From

nytimes.com

Email Address

nytdirect@nytimes.com

Sent On

Wed, Dec 20, 2017 12:18 AM

Email Preheader Text

From Amanda Hess, Matt Apuzzo and more View in | Add nytdirect@nytimes.com to your address book. Tue

From Amanda Hess, Matt Apuzzo and more View in [Browser]( | Add nytdirect@nytimes.com to your address book. [The New York Times]( [The New York Times]( Tuesday, December 19, 2017 [NYTimes.com »]( New York Times reporters and editors are highlighting great stories from around the web. Let us know how you like it at [wwr@nytimes.com](mailto:wwr@nytimes.com?subject=Newsletter%200106%20Feedback). [Suspicion]( []( Christopher Gregory/The New York Times [Anna Dubenko]( [Anna Dubenko]( Senior Digital Strategist The president’s allies in the media and elsewhere have focused their attention on the integrity of Robert Mueller’s investigation, pointing to text messages by an F.B.I. agent recently dismissed from the team. The right has had a range of reactions — from proposing that a committee be formed to “investigate the investigators” to using the scandal to discredit the entire Russia inquiry all together. The left is worried that this is all pretext for Mr. Trump to fire Mr. Mueller. In which case, one writer argues, impeachment. [THE NEW YORK TIMES]( [»]( [Same Old, Same Old]( []( Bob Berg/Getty Images [Amanda Hess]( [Amanda Hess]( David Carr Fellow In 2009, D.C.’s alt-weekly, the Washington City Paper, published my story on a culture of sexual harassment and complicity at the Marijuana Policy Project. Now, in the midst of our national reckoning on sexual harassment, the reporter Rachel Cohen revisited the case and discovered what happens to an organization that never fully reckons with its own problems. [WASHINGTON CITY PAPER »]( [Reset]( []( Alamy [Matt Apuzzo]( [Matt Apuzzo]( Washington Correspondent Silicon Valley’s public relations bubble has burst, and this story marvelously captures why we don’t (and shouldn’t) view start-up success stories quite the same way anymore. [WIRED »]( ADVERTISEMENT [In the Red]( []( Alamy [Alan Henry]( [Alan Henry]( Smarter Living Editor The debt collection industry is already shady, but this piece dives into exactly how shady it really is, and how millions are hounded and harassed into paying off debts they don’t owe. Instead of lining the pockets of scammers just to make them go away, one man fought back — with a vengeance, and even got the F.B.I. to notice. [BLOOMBERG BUSINESSWEEK »]( [Between the Slices]( []( Chris Radburn/PA, via Associated Press [Prashant Rao]( [Prashant Rao]( Deputy Europe Business Editor Britain is often laughed off for having an indistinct or boring cuisine (A French colleague once joked to me, “If you like their food, you’ll love their weather”). But while much has changed here in that respect in recent years, one thing has remained constant: the British love for the humble sandwich. This story takes us through the sandwich’s founding, its development and how it now defines modern Britain. [THE GUARDIAN »]( [The Struggle]( [Patrick Boehler]( [Patrick Boehler]( Briefings Team A beautifully crafted visual guide to the financial headwinds millennials are up against and what could be done to address them. This stuck in mind: “Any attempt to recreate the economic conditions the boomers had is just sending lifeboats to a whirlpool.”  [HUFFPOST HIGHLINE »]( ADVERTISEMENT [In Vino, Veritas]( []( Moris Moreno for The New York Times [Kim Severson]( [Kim Severson]( National Food Correspondent Who would go to such lengths to source and taste all the varieties of Trump wine? The food authority and Atlantic editor Corby Kummer, who mixes shoe-leather reporting (and tasting) with funny, smart and otherwise delicious writing. [VANITY FAIR »]( [Yum?]( []( Pat Wellenbach/Associated Press [Sam Sifton]( [Sam Sifton]( Food Editor See what you make of this ranking of the nation’s most popular chain restaurants. [THE WASHINGTON POST »]( Obviously, You Love to Read So you might like The New York Times Magazine newsletter. Exclusive feature stories, photography, columns and more, delivered to your inbox every week. Sign up [here](. Make a friend’s day: Forward this email. Get this from a friend? [Sign up here](. You can also read us [on the web](. Share your feedback on What We’re Reading. Email us at wwr@nytimes.com. Check out [our full range of free newsletters]( FOLLOW NYTimes [Facebook] [FACEBOOK]( [Twitter] [@nytimes]( ABOUT THIS EMAIL You received this message because you signed up for NYTimes.com's What We're Reading newsletter. [Unsubscribe]( | [Manage Subscriptions]( | [Change Your Email]( | [Privacy Policy]( | [Contact]( | [Advertise]( Copyright 2017 The New York Times Company 620 Eighth Avenue New York, NY 10018

Marketing emails from nytimes.com

View More
Sent On

08/12/2024

Sent On

08/12/2024

Sent On

07/12/2024

Sent On

07/12/2024

Sent On

07/12/2024

Sent On

07/12/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.