Newsletter Subject

Opinion: Left on economics, not culture

From

nytimes.com

Email Address

nytdirect@nytimes.com

Sent On

Tue, Nov 14, 2017 01:30 PM

Email Preheader Text

Also: Bill Clinton’s behavior, in need of reckoning. View in | Add nytdirect@nytimes.com to you

Also: Bill Clinton’s behavior, in need of reckoning. View in [Browser]( | Add nytdirect@nytimes.com to your address book. [The New York Times]( [The New York Times]( Tuesday, November 14, 2017 [NYTimes.com/Opinion »]( [David Leonhardt] David Leonhardt Op-Ed Columnist One of the worst pieces of advice that Democrats are getting is to move right on economic policy in order to win back swing voters. It tends to come from centrists who are confusing [their own policy wishes]( with smart political advice. Some new survey data — which [Lee Drutman highlights in an op-ed]( — help show how misplaced this advice is. Most swing voters lean notably left on economic policy, the data show. It’s true of people who voted for Barack Obama in 2012 but not Hillary Clinton in 2016 and even of those who switched from Mitt Romney in 2012 to Clinton in 2016. “Moving right on economics,” Drutman writes, “will not help Democrats with any of these voters and could even risk losing some, demoralizing an energized base, especially younger voters.” The situation on cultural issues is different, however. On those issues, the survey data show, many more swing voters lean right — especially those who switched from Obama in 2012 to Donald Trump in 2016. (The second chart [in Drutman’s piece]( is particularly striking.) I’d argue that progressives who ignore the second half of this message are making the same mistake as centrists who ignore the first. We all have our own policy preferences. But encouraging politicians to support our own preferences isn’t the same as giving good political advice. On this same topic, I’m reminded of my colleague Ross Douthat’s recent argument that the Democrats erred [by nominating a proud supporter of abortion rights]( for the Senate seat in Alabama, a decidedly anti-abortion state. Speaking of that Alabama campaign ... I believe the women who say that Roy Moore molested them when they were teenagers. Their statements have been detailed and are consistent with one another’s. They also have bits of corroborating evidence — no easy thing decades later — and the women have no apparent motivation other than telling the truth. But let’s say you’re more skeptical than I am and have been trying to figure out whom to believe. Yesterday was clarifying. Anna Claire Vollers of The Huntsville Times reported that residents of Gadsden, Alabama — where Moore was born — have long been aware of Moore’s interest in teenage girls. “Moore and other Republican leaders have questioned why it took so long for his accusers, now in their 50s, to come forward publicly,” [Vollers reports, on AL.com](. “And yet people who lived in Etowah County during that time have said Moore’s flirting with and dating much younger women and girls was no secret.” Charles Bethea of The New Yorker also has [a report from Gadsden]( about Moore’s behavior at the local mall: “This past weekend, I spoke or messaged with more than a dozen people—including a major political figure in the state—who told me that they had heard, over the years, that Moore had been banned from the mall because he repeatedly badgered teen-age girls.” And another woman came forward to accuse Moore of sexual abuse yesterday. Caroline Orr — a behavioral scientist with a big Twitter following — had [a smart summary]( of the incentives facing the woman, Beverly Young Nelson: She came forward “*after* she watched his other accusers get doxxed, harassed, & re-traumatized.” (For those of you looking for a definition of “doxxing,” Merriam-Webster is [here to help]( “slang: to publicly identify or publish private information about (someone) especially as a form of punishment or revenge.”) Elsewhere. In The Atlantic, Caitlin Flanagan resurfaces a 1998 Times op-ed by Gloria Steinem, and uses it [to challenge Democrats]( to reckon with the old accusations against Bill Clinton. Steinem defended Clinton at the time. Flanagan most certainly does not. Referring to Clinton, Flanagan writes: “It was a pattern of behavior; it included an alleged violent assault; the women involved had far more credible evidence than many of the most notorious accusations that have come to light in the past five weeks. But Clinton was not left to the swift and pitiless justice that today’s accused men have experienced. Rather, he was rescued by a surprising force: machine feminism.” My colleague Michelle Goldberg [also writes about the Clinton question]( in today’s Times: “Democrats are guilty of apologizing for Clinton when they shouldn’t have. At the same time, looking back at the smear campaign against the Clintons shows we can’t treat the feminist injunction to ‘believe women’ as absolute.” The full Opinion report from The Times follows, including [Susan Rice onÂ]( and China](. Editorial [President Trump’s Thing for Thugs]( By THE EDITORIAL BOARD The degree to which he grovels before some of the world’s most unsavory leaders hurts U.S. credibility and influence. Editorial [Mitch McConnell Believes the Women. Good for Him.]( By THE EDITORIAL BOARD Don’t hold your breath waiting for real change, but the Senate majority leader has set a good example by accepting the word of Roy Moore’s accusers. Op-Ed Columnist [The Siege Mentality Problem]( By DAVID BROOKS It explains most of the dysfunctional group behavior these days, on left and right. Op-Ed Columnist [I Believe Juanita]( By MICHELLE GOLDBERG Coming to terms with Bill Clinton and right-wing disinformation. Op-Ed Columnist [Republican Class Warfare: The Next Generation]( By PAUL KRUGMAN The G.O.P. tax bills look like attempts to entrench a hereditary plutocracy. Op-Ed Contributors [Can Trumpism Survive Trump?]( By ROSS DOUTHAT, DANIEL MCCARTHY AND HENRY OLSEN Looking for a political figure on the American scene to give conservatives hope. HOW ARE WE DOING? We’d love your feedback on this newsletter. Please email thoughts and suggestions to [leonhardt@nytimes.com](mailto:leonhardt@nytimes.com?subject=Opinion%20Today%20Newsletter%20Feedback). ADVERTISEMENT Op-Ed Contributor [Susan Rice: Trump Is Making China Great Again]( By SUSAN E. RICE The president’s grand trip failed to produce meaningful concessions from China on trade and if anything strengthened Beijing’s hand in Asia. Op-Ed Contributors [The U.S. Is Tackling Global Warming, Even if Trump Isn’t]( By MICHAEL R. BLOOMBERG AND JERRY BROWN Leaders from state Capitols, city halls and businesses have come to a climate meeting in Bonn to say America remains committed to the Paris accord. Adam McCauley [Op-Ed Contributors]( [Robbing Blue States to Pay Red]( By JACOB S. HACKER AND PAUL PIERSON The dangerous new Republican policies impose costs on states behind partisan lines. Editorial [Mrs. May’s Tribulations]( By THE EDITORIAL BOARD Scandals that would have rocked the government in normal times have all but paralyzed it during brutally complex Brexit talks. Contributing Op-Ed Writer [From Sicily, a Voice of Discontent to Scare All Italy]( By BEPPE SEVERGNINI Members of the populist Five Star Movement, which came in No. 2 in regional voting, are neither real reformers nor harmless buffoons. Op-Ed Contributors [Don’t Muzzle Former C.I.A. Officers]( By CINDY OTIS, NED PRICE AND JOHN SIPHER Criticizing wrongheaded or shortsighted decisions by senior officials is very different from divulging classified information. Op-Ed Contributor [The Ivory Tower Can’t Keep Ignoring Tech]( By CATHY O’NEIL Algorithms are shaping our lives. Where’s academia when it comes to helping us make sense of this? Op-Ed Contributor [Two Dozen African Girls Dead at Sea]( By TARIRO MZEZEWA The horrors of a refugee crisis that the world feels free to ignore. Op-Ed Contributor [Puerto Rico’s Actual Death Toll]( By ERIC KLINENBERG Trump’s initial figure turns out to be woefully low. Vietnam ‘67 [An American Child in Vietnam]( By MARGARET CHILDS WESTMORELAND Margaret Childs Westmoreland, the daughter of Gen. William Westmoreland, was 9 years old when she joined him in South Vietnam. SIGN UP FOR THE VIETNAM ’67 NEWSLETTER Examining America’s long war in Southeast Asia [through the course]( of a single year. ADVERTISEMENT Letters [Roy Moore, and Other Harassment Charges]( Some are cut off right away, others not. Why? LIKE THIS EMAIL? Forward it to your friends, and let them know they can sign up [here](. FOLLOW OPINION [Facebook] [FACEBOOK]( [Twitter] [@nytopinion]( [Pinterest] [Pinterest]( Get more [NYTimes.com newsletters »](  | Get unlimited access to NYTimes.com and our NYTimes apps. [Subscribe »]( ABOUT THIS EMAIL You received this message because you signed up for NYTimes.com's Opinion Today newsletter. [Unsubscribe]( | [Manage Subscriptions]( | [Change Your Email]( | [Privacy Policy]( | [Contact]( | [Advertise]( Copyright 2017 The New York Times Company 620 Eighth Avenue New York, NY 10018

Marketing emails from nytimes.com

View More
Sent On

08/12/2024

Sent On

08/12/2024

Sent On

07/12/2024

Sent On

07/12/2024

Sent On

07/12/2024

Sent On

07/12/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.