We need stronger management to fix our budget. Dear New Yorkers, This is a long email, but important! Yesterday, I [testified]( to the New York City Council on Mayor Adamsâs FY 2025 Preliminary Budget. A few important points I covered in my testimony were transparency in the budget process (or, more precisely, the lack of it), cuts to critical services, and inadequate affordable housing policies. My [full report]( on the FY 2025 Preliminary Budget provides clarity about the state of City finances. Here's the bottom line: Rather than the Adams Administrationâs unpredictable approach to the budget process, sound management and strategic investments are required to face the Cityâs fiscal challenges, confront the affordability crisis, and ensure strong economic growth in the years ahead. Lack of transparency in City finances There are two ways in which the Adams Administrationâs approach has unhelpfully muddled the budget process. For starters, thereâs been a lot of unnecessary budget whiplash in the last few months. Last June, at the time of the FY 2024 budget adoption, the Administration presented the FY 2025 budget gap at $5.1 billion. In November, it increased that projection to $7.1 billion, even after one round of proposed cuts. Then just a few weeks later, in January, the FY 2025 budget was presented as balanced. These shifts are caused in part by the administrationâs swinging cost estimates for asylum seeker services. Last June, it projected the cost at $3.91 billion. Just two months later, it increased that projection to $10.82 billion. More recently, it got lowered to $9.09 billion. We've got to get this under control. Secondly, the significant underbudgeting of many predictable expenditures, particularly special education Carter Cases and uniformed overtime, further clouds the picture. This pattern of underbudgeting expenses is a routine part of the Cityâs budgetingâand itâs not a good practice. Additionally, the Mayor has not been clear on which Federal Stimulus funded programs will continue at current levels or face reductions as these funds expire. Where does this leave us? All in all, the Comptrollerâs Office projects a budget gap of $3.30 billion in FY 2025 â with more outyear gaps on the horizon. Stronger fiscal management will reduce the need for big cuts⯠How should the City approach these budget gaps? We shouldnât respond with [shortsighted, drastic cuts]( to vital City services and programs like CUNY, libraries, alternatives-to-incarceration, and more. Instead, we should work harder to cover outyear budget gaps through stronger fiscal management. We can achieve long-term savings by reeling in areas of overspending, like uniformed overtime. We can reduce pricey Carter Case settlements by providing better special education services in our public schools, as my office has [previously suggested](. By making agencies responsible for car crash claim and settlement payouts (as recommended in ourâ¯[report on traffic collisions]( we could further increase our savings. We can also save money with stronger management of emergency procurement. In a [report released last week]( my team found that the Adams Administration's haphazard approach to emergency contracting (and its failure to compare or control prices) resulted in City agencies overpaying MILLIONS of dollars to staff asylum seeker services. We compared the City's top 4 emergency contracts for staffing asylum seeker facilities, like welcome centers and HERRCs, and found drastic discrepancies in pricing. In one comparison, compensation ranged from $58 to $201 for the same service. Finally, rather than evicting [asylum seekers]( and families from shelter just 30 or 60 days after theyâve arrived, we should invest in legal services, case management, and assistance to obtain work authorizations. This is the most cost-effective, compassionate approach to helping immigrants get on their feet, move out of shelter, and find employment. Affordable housing should be the #1 priority this year Everywhere across the City, rent remains incredibly high, burdening New Yorkers. Unfortunately, the FY 2025 Preliminary Budget does not do nearly enough to finance the production and preservation of truly affordable housingâone of the most powerful tools the City has to stabilize neighborhoods and protect low-income and working families from displacement. We urgently need a deal in Albany that increases housing supply across income levels, with a focus on affordability, good cause protections, and housing vouchers to help people escape homelessness and secure permanent housing. We also need much larger City investments in deeply affordable, community-controlled rental and limited-equity cooperative homeownership housing. All the while, we must ensure that the Department of Housing Preservation and Development has additional resourcesâ¯to clear itsâ¯backlog of affordable housing projects, developâ¯and train new staff, and expand the Cityâs socialâ¯housing footprint (as covered in our recent report,â¯[Building Blocks of Change](. Our short-term budget decisions must not short-change New Yorkâs future. With sound management and strategic investments, we can tackle outyear budget gaps, confront the affordability crisis, and ensure strong economic growth in the years ahead. [Read my full report on the FY 2025 Preliminary Budget](. Thanks, Brad [Facebook]( [Twitter]( [Link]( [New York City Comptroller's Office]( Copyright © 2024 New York City Comptroller's Office, All rights reserved. Our mailing address is:
1 Centre Street, New York, NY 10007 Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can [update your preferences]( or [unsubscribe from this list](.