Newsletter Subject

Testimony on the Mayor's FY 2025 Preliminary Budget

From

nyc.gov

Email Address

press@comptroller.nyc.gov

Sent On

Tue, Mar 5, 2024 08:20 PM

Email Preheader Text

We need stronger management to fix our budget. Dear New Yorkers, This is a long email, but important

We need stronger management to fix our budget. Dear New Yorkers, This is a long email, but important! Yesterday, I [testified]( to the New York City Council on Mayor Adams’s FY 2025 Preliminary Budget. A few important points I covered in my testimony were transparency in the budget process (or, more precisely, the lack of it), cuts to critical services, and inadequate affordable housing policies. My [full report]( on the FY 2025 Preliminary Budget provides clarity about the state of City finances. Here's the bottom line: Rather than the Adams Administration’s unpredictable approach to the budget process, sound management and strategic investments are required to face the City’s fiscal challenges, confront the affordability crisis, and ensure strong economic growth in the years ahead. Lack of transparency in City finances There are two ways in which the Adams Administration’s approach has unhelpfully muddled the budget process. For starters, there’s been a lot of unnecessary budget whiplash in the last few months. Last June, at the time of the FY 2024 budget adoption, the Administration presented the FY 2025 budget gap at $5.1 billion. In November, it increased that projection to $7.1 billion, even after one round of proposed cuts. Then just a few weeks later, in January, the FY 2025 budget was presented as balanced. These shifts are caused in part by the administration’s swinging cost estimates for asylum seeker services. Last June, it projected the cost at $3.91 billion. Just two months later, it increased that projection to $10.82 billion. More recently, it got lowered to $9.09 billion. We've got to get this under control. Secondly, the significant underbudgeting of many predictable expenditures, particularly special education Carter Cases and uniformed overtime, further clouds the picture. This pattern of underbudgeting expenses is a routine part of the City’s budgeting—and it’s not a good practice. Additionally, the Mayor has not been clear on which Federal Stimulus funded programs will continue at current levels or face reductions as these funds expire. Where does this leave us? All in all, the Comptroller’s Office projects a budget gap of $3.30 billion in FY 2025 – with more outyear gaps on the horizon. Stronger fiscal management will reduce the need for big cuts  How should the City approach these budget gaps? We shouldn’t respond with [shortsighted, drastic cuts]( to vital City services and programs like CUNY, libraries, alternatives-to-incarceration, and more. Instead, we should work harder to cover outyear budget gaps through stronger fiscal management. We can achieve long-term savings by reeling in areas of overspending, like uniformed overtime. We can reduce pricey Carter Case settlements by providing better special education services in our public schools, as my office has [previously suggested](. By making agencies responsible for car crash claim and settlement payouts (as recommended in our [report on traffic collisions]( we could further increase our savings. We can also save money with stronger management of emergency procurement. In a [report released last week]( my team found that the Adams Administration's haphazard approach to emergency contracting (and its failure to compare or control prices) resulted in City agencies overpaying MILLIONS of dollars to staff asylum seeker services. We compared the City's top 4 emergency contracts for staffing asylum seeker facilities, like welcome centers and HERRCs, and found drastic discrepancies in pricing. In one comparison, compensation ranged from $58 to $201 for the same service. Finally, rather than evicting [asylum seekers]( and families from shelter just 30 or 60 days after they’ve arrived, we should invest in legal services, case management, and assistance to obtain work authorizations. This is the most cost-effective, compassionate approach to helping immigrants get on their feet, move out of shelter, and find employment. Affordable housing should be the #1 priority this year Everywhere across the City, rent remains incredibly high, burdening New Yorkers. Unfortunately, the FY 2025 Preliminary Budget does not do nearly enough to finance the production and preservation of truly affordable housing—one of the most powerful tools the City has to stabilize neighborhoods and protect low-income and working families from displacement. We urgently need a deal in Albany that increases housing supply across income levels, with a focus on affordability, good cause protections, and housing vouchers to help people escape homelessness and secure permanent housing. We also need much larger City investments in deeply affordable, community-controlled rental and limited-equity cooperative homeownership housing. All the while, we must ensure that the Department of Housing Preservation and Development has additional resources to clear its backlog of affordable housing projects, develop and train new staff, and expand the City’s social housing footprint (as covered in our recent report, [Building Blocks of Change](. Our short-term budget decisions must not short-change New York’s future. With sound management and strategic investments, we can tackle outyear budget gaps, confront the affordability crisis, and ensure strong economic growth in the years ahead. [Read my full report on the FY 2025 Preliminary Budget](. Thanks, Brad [Facebook]( [Twitter]( [Link]( [New York City Comptroller's Office]( Copyright © 2024 New York City Comptroller's Office, All rights reserved. Our mailing address is: 1 Centre Street, New York, NY 10007 Want to change how you receive these emails? You can [update your preferences]( or [unsubscribe from this list](.

Marketing emails from nyc.gov

View More
Sent On

08/12/2024

Sent On

07/11/2024

Sent On

22/10/2024

Sent On

16/10/2024

Sent On

15/10/2024

Sent On

13/10/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.