Newsletter Subject

Audit: NYC isn’t doing its “Fair Share”

From

nyc.gov

Email Address

press@comptroller.nyc.gov

Sent On

Thu, Nov 9, 2023 03:04 PM

Email Preheader Text

City services and facilities are unfairly distributed. Dear New Yorkers, Today, my office published

City services and facilities are unfairly distributed. Dear New Yorkers, Today, my office published a landmark audit about the equitability of City services and facilities. After carefully analyzing 5 years of data, we found that New York City is largely failing to comply with mandated “Fair Share" requirements. We also found that the City has not been transparent with the public about these shortcomings. [Complete with interactive maps, you can view the full report and analysis here.]( In other words, we found that many City services and facilities – from parks and waste treatment plants, to shelters and social services – are unfairly distributed. This exacerbates racial and economic disparities in our neighborhoods. Our findings may come as no surprise to the New Yorkers whose lived experiences have been shaped by the unfair distribution of City services. Some neighborhoods have 100x shelter beds than others. Neighborhoods with significant Asian populations have less access to parks. Meanwhile, noisy and pollutant waste treatment plants are concentrated in neighborhoods with low incomes. The disparities fall along the lines of race and income. What is “Fair Share”? Adopted in the 1989 City Charter Revision, “Fair Share” is a provision that requires the City to make a concerted effort to ensure that neighborhoods get their fair share of amenities like parks and libraries, and do their fair share to confront citywide problems like homelessness. According to our audit and analysis, the following four facility types are distributed unfairly throughout New York City neighborhoods: - Parks - Waste transfer sites - Homeless shelters (includes sanctuary sites and HERRCs) - Social services (includes mental health centers and substance use disorder treatment programs) What does unfair distribution of City Services look like? Unfairly distributed social services are one example of how the City is failing to live up to its ‘Fair Share’ obligations. [View our full report and geospatial analysis of a wide range of City facilities.]( As you can see in the map below, social services – including mental health centers and substance use treatment programs – are much more likely to be in neighborhoods with a higher percentage of people living below the poverty line. Meanwhile, Manhattan CDs 10 and 11 (Harlem and East Harlem) are doing far more of their fair share than the rest of the borough. How do we achieve equitable distribution? Fairness must be embedded in how we build our city, share opportunities, and rise to challenges. My office put forward [several recommendations]( on how we can make the distribution of City services and facilities more equitable. It’s imperative that we instate clear, centralized City oversight over Fair Share compliance, while also improving public access to information on facility capacity and concentration, among other recommendations. Failing to attend to fairness and transparency erodes public trust and makes it harder to meet our collective needs. [Please take a moment to view our complete report on the distribution of City services and facilities, complete with interactive maps!]( With hope for a more equitable future, Brad [Facebook]( [Twitter]( [Link]( [New York City Comptroller's Office]( Copyright © 2023 New York City Comptroller's Office, All rights reserved. Our mailing address is: 1 Centre Street, New York, NY 10007 Want to change how you receive these emails? You can [update your preferences]( or [unsubscribe from this list](.

Marketing emails from nyc.gov

View More
Sent On

08/12/2024

Sent On

07/11/2024

Sent On

22/10/2024

Sent On

16/10/2024

Sent On

15/10/2024

Sent On

13/10/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.