Newsletter Subject

The high-rising cost of NYC’s most unaffordable tax exemption

From

nyc.gov

Email Address

press@comptroller.nyc.gov

Sent On

Sat, Mar 19, 2022 02:17 PM

Email Preheader Text

Today, the 421-a program is a towering boondoggle—costing our city $1.77 billion this year in f

Today, the 421-a program is a towering boondoggle—costing our city $1.77 billion this year in foregone taxes. Dear New Yorkers, Over the years, New York’s property tax system has become a patchwork of exemptions and abatements responding to changes in the housing market. The result is a hard-to-understand system that taxes homeowners in Park Slope at lower rates than those in Southeast Queens, and rental properties nearly double the rate of condo buildings. In the words of the NYC Commission on Property Tax Reform last year, our system is “opaque,” “arcane,” and “inequitable.” The largest of those exemptions is 421-a. Established in 1971, the 421-a tax exemption was designed to spur housing development at a time of disinvestment. Today, the 421-a program is a towering boondoggle—costing our city $1.77 billion this year in foregone taxes and delivering only a small handful of actually affordable units in return. [On Wednesday, I rallied with a group of elected officials and housing advocates in Downtown Brooklyn]( to unveil a new report from my office titled A Better Way than 421-a (which you can read in full: [here](. Together, we outlined the major shortcomings of this program, and made the case for comprehensive property tax reform. There is a proposal under consideration in Albany right now to reform 421-a that merely tinkers around the edges, rearranging the numbers and letters but with essentially the same outcomes. It’s tantamount to slapping a gold-plated bandaid on to hold together a deeply inequitable and opaque property tax system, while pretending we’ve fixed our affordable housing crisis. My office estimates that more than 60% of the income-restricted units created by the 2017 version of the 421-a program were built for families earning well over $100,000 a year. For example, a family of three would have to earn up to $139,620 and pay about $3,400 a month for an “affordable” two-bedroom apartment. It is a great representation of everything wrong with our housing strategy. The tax revenue we don’t collect through 421-a outstrips the entire budget for the Department of Housing Preservation and Development. And what are we getting for it? Housing that 75% of New Yorkers can’t afford. Our housing affordability crisis is one of the biggest challenges to a fair and equitable recovery. New Yorkers all across the five boroughs are dealing with surging rents and facing the prospect of eviction—even if they did everything right and always paid rent on time. Policies like Good Cause eviction protections, which [I wrote to you all about last month]( will help protect tenants from losing their homes to spiking rents. But we also need truly affordable housing. 421-a isn’t producing that, so it’s time to seize this moment to fix an underlying problem in our housing market: a property tax system that taxes homeowners inequitably and disincentivizes rental construction. Building on the principles and recommendations in the New York City Advisory Commission on Property Tax Reform’s Final Report in December, my office urges comprehensive property tax reform that would include the following elements: - Tax 1-3 family homes, co-ops and condominiums, and small rental buildings at the same rate. Build in tax relief programs that favor primary and low-income residents and replace the current assessed value growth caps. - Bring tax parity to new residential constructions (both rentals and homeownership) to provide a broad, strong, fair incentive for new construction going forward. This would largely eliminate the need for a 421a-style development incentive program. - Establish a new, targeted affordable housing tax incentive that would match the level needed to achieve genuine affordability, rather than provide a tax exemption that underwrites both market-rate and income restricted units. This new incentive should also come along with strong labor standards to provide good jobs for New Yorkers. It’s time to let 421-a sunset—and take our best shot to build a fair and stable property tax system that eliminates disparities, facilitates rental development, and focuses our scarce affordable housing resources on genuinely affordable housing. Read more in our new report [here](. Towards a fairer and more durable recovery, Brad [Facebook]( [Twitter]( [Link]( [New York City Comptroller's Office]( Copyright © 2022 New York City Comptroller's Office, All rights reserved. Our mailing address is: 1 Centre Street, New York, NY 10007 Want to change how you receive these emails? You can [update your preferences]( or [unsubscribe from this list](.

Marketing emails from nyc.gov

View More
Sent On

08/12/2024

Sent On

07/11/2024

Sent On

22/10/2024

Sent On

16/10/2024

Sent On

15/10/2024

Sent On

13/10/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.