Newsletter Subject

Journalism’s coverage of weight and size

From

npr.org

Email Address

email@nl.npr.org

Sent On

Thu, Mar 2, 2023 12:00 PM

Email Preheader Text

Searches for nuance, finally In 2013, the American Medical Association officially changed its on obe

Searches for nuance, finally [View this email online]( [NPR Public Editor by Poynter's Kelly McBride]( In 2013, the American Medical Association officially changed its [position]( on obesity, advising medical practitioners that the condition is a chronic disease requiring medical treatment, not an individual’s failure. In 2018, the National Institutes of Health published a [paper]( pointing out that the media had not yet caught up to the AMA, and instead continued to perpetuate the false belief that obesity is only a matter of self-control. In 2023, health journalists everywhere are finally catching up with the science, as well as exploring and explaining the social baggage that often prevents us from having fact-based conversations about body size. Today we address two listener letters about NPR stories. The first story is an interview with an author of a newly released book on cultural myths about “fat” people. The second story is a look at a new and expensive weight-loss drug getting results, but not always covered by insurance. Both listeners offered comments and asked questions that poke at this gap between cultural assumptions and medical knowledge. We looked closely at both stories, as well as NPR’s work on the topic of obesity. Read on to see what we found. And we spotlight two examples of great NPR journalism. The first is a look into the connection between workplace relationships and job satisfaction. The second is a series of stories on a virus research station in Guatemala looking to spot the next pandemic. [Illustration by Carlos Carmonamedina] Illustration by Carlos Carmonamedina [Illustration by Carlos Carmonamedina] Here are a few quotes from the Public Editor's inbox that resonated with us. Letters are edited for length and clarity. You can share your questions and concerns with us through the [NPR Contact page](. Covering stories about weight, size and health Audience members recently wrote to us about two very different NPR stories related to coverage of body weight. We analyzed the two stories and asked a couple of journalists what reporters should consider when covering these issues. Alex Park wrote on Jan. 9: All Things Considered has waded into double-think where obesity is normalized, and journalism no longer needs rigorous questioning around important public-health issues. [The interview]( with Juana Summers of Aubrey Gordon … allowed Gordon to gaslight obesity as a health-choice rather than a societal health crisis. … All Things Considered has spent ample time identifying and calling out anti-science bias around the climate change argument, but amplifies anti-health propaganda and ignores science wherever “identity” is involved. Host Juana Summers’ All Things Considered interview with author and podcast co-host Aubrey Gordon mostly focused on body image and understanding of what “fatness” means. (A [longer version]( was also published by Life Kit.) It was a conversation about Gordon’s new book, “You Just Need To Lose Weight” and 19 Other Myths About Fat People. At the beginning of the ATC piece, Gordon clearly states that obesity is not a choice: “Researchers have been clear for years that our body size isn’t solely or even primarily the result of our own choices.” She also discussed the scientific shortcomings of body mass index measurements, or BMI. The ATC interview also featured Gordon’s perspective on the word “fat.” The word “obesity” does not appear in the ATC piece. The focus of this story was appropriately placed on the social implications of “fatness.” It’s a worthy topic to explore, and Gordon is a credible source based on her personal experience and her recent work as a writer on this topic. Finally, given that the average American is overweight, or plus-sized or “fat,” as Gordon would say, it’s important to explore the cultural burdens placed on a significant part of the population. Jessica Rainey wrote on Jan. 30: Firstly, I appreciate NPR’s attempts to present a full and accurate picture of today’s issues which is why I was greatly disappointed with [[Morning Edition’]( oversimplification of obesity and weight loss. … [It] reduced the issue to “maybe I should try changing my diet myself and exercise …” As if that is all it takes to lose weight and as if it is only a matter of willpower. … Please do better. Allison Aubrey’s Morning Edition report on the “breakthrough” weight-loss drug Wegovy focused on the challenges some patients face getting their insurance to cover the costs. The story exposed the conundrum: The drug is expensive, $1,400 per month, and if patients stop taking it, the weight comes back. As he interviewed Aubrey about her reporting, Morning Edition host Steve Inskeep says, “Well, some people listening to that might say, well, I really shouldn’t be starting this drug. Maybe I should be trying to change my diet myself or doing a little more exercise.” Aubrey responded, “I think most people would like to lose weight by diet and exercise. But we live in a society where people are sedentary, in part due to our jobs. ... And the unhealthiest foods are the cheapest foods.” Inskeep’s statement was not intended to imply that willpower is the solution. (NPR has reported on the [connection]( between obesity and other factors, like genetics.) Instead, he was giving voice to a question that many listeners might have as they learn about Wegovy. Aubrey’s response and the interviews she conducted provided a nuanced view of what it takes to lose weight and, more specifically, how the affordability of drugs like Wegovy is affected by health care options. NPR’s take on coverage of weight and obesity Those two stories are just some of many NPR has published about “[fatness]( [BMI]( and [obesity](. Tony Cavin, NPR’s managing editor for standards and practices, wrote in an email that like “any other topic NPR journalists need to be respectful of their subjects, interview multiple sources and make sure that their reporting is based on science.” “There are stories about ‘weight’ and health and there are stories about ‘weight’ and body image. I think the distinction is usually quite clear,” he wrote. “There is lots of evidence that weight is a health issue and we should cover it as such. When covering a story about someone trying to achieve a certain look, regardless of possible health effects, we cover that as well.” Cavin said NPR journalists rarely use the word “fat” and it’s often in quotes. He said “overweight” and “obese” are more precise, and that NPR usually attributes the definitions of those words to the CDC while giving more context. Other journalists’ thoughts on terminology The Associated Press Stylebook currently doesn’t have specific guidance on the terms “overweight,” “fat” or “obese.” Paula Froke, editor of the AP Stylebook, wrote in an email that the topic is on their list to consider in the coming year. The team devotes significant research and discussion when developing guidelines, she said. “Generally, we also advise using terms that an individual or group prefers,” Froke said. “That could apply to terms such as ‘obese,’ ‘fat’ and ‘overweight.’” We also talked with Tara Haelle, an independent science journalist who advises about reporting on medical studies, including those on obesity, through the Association of Health Care Journalists. She acknowledges that the topic is challenging: “‘Fat’ is the curse word for certain people. And ‘obesity’ is the curse word for other people. That becomes really challenging as journalists because ‘obesity’ is the medical term.” But by being more precise, journalists can be more accurate and inclusive, she said. Haelle recommends that journalists: - Use more nuanced language to describe being medically at risk because of weight, size or obesity. Even though weight or size can be linked to someone’s metabolic health, studies show they aren’t always, she said. Reporters can be more precise by using terms like “overweight and medically unhealthy” or “metabolically unhealthy obesity” when describing a person’s related condition. Such conditions might include high blood pressure or insulin resistance. - Help the audience understand the perspective on body weight being presented, such as making clear whether information is being discussed from a medical or social point of view. For example, she thought the Morning Edition story did a good job of establishing this when Aubrey said Wegovy “is not a drug for cosmetic weight loss. This is a drug for people whose health is at risk due to obesity.” - Put words like “fat” in quotation marks in written copy to acknowledge that the word carries different connotations for different people. - Show audiences that body image is much more than how people think they look. “Research shows that you can’t separate mental health and physical health — they are intrinsically connected and one influences the other,” she said. “You can destigmatize being a certain size without saying that you should or shouldn't be that size,” Haelle said. “Working to erase stigma doesn't imply condoning. … We can work as the media to destigmatize these things without passing judgment on them.” We appreciate these recommendations. Across the news media, reporting on body weight as a medical and cultural issue is evolving to be clearer and more accurate. NPR is clearly part of this transformation. In the two very different stories we looked at, as well as other coverage, NPR provided new insights, fresh perspectives and solid facts. It’s likely that journalism will continue to grow in its awareness of the many complexities in covering weight-related topics from both health and social standpoints. As a conversational audio storyteller, NPR has the ability and expertise to let the audience in on this nuance. — Emily Barske [Illustration by Carlos Carmonamedina] The Public Editor spends a lot of time examining moments where NPR fell short. Yet we also learn a lot about NPR by looking at work that we find to be compelling and excellent journalism. Here we share a line or two about the pieces where NPR shines. Work friends An NPR digital [story]( explored research showing that connection to colleagues is a key indicator of how happy someone is in their job. While other types of relationships in life are necessary for well-being, friendships at your job are important because we spend so many hours working, Dr. Robert Waldinger, a Harvard professor of psychiatry, says in the piece. Health correspondent Rhitu Chatterjee examined the impact of workplace friendships and reported on practical ways to nurture those friendships in a working world that has changed dramatically in the last few years. — Emily Barske Virus investigators NPR Science Desk contributor Ari Daniel reported [multiple]( [stories]( about a small clinic and research outpost in rural western Guatemala called FunSalud, where locals look into illnesses. As part of NPR’s series “Hidden Viruses: How Pandemics Really Begin,” Daniel introduced us to the team who go out into the community to look for emerging diseases with pandemic potential. “If anything COVID and Zika and H1N1 have taught us, it’s that you can’t stick your head in the sand and hope that the next pandemic isn’t going to arrive,” said Dan Olson, a research director at the center. These stories are insightful and in-depth explorations of the work being done on the ground in one country to help prevent the next pandemic. — Amaris Castillo The Office of the Public Editor is a team. Editor Kayla Randall, reporters Amaris Castillo and Emily Barske, and copy editor Merrill Perlman make this newsletter possible. Illustrations are by Carlos Carmonamedina. We are still reading all of your messages on [Facebook]( [Twitter]( and [from our inbox](. As always, keep them coming. Kelly McBride NPR Public Editor Chair, [Craig Newmark Center for Ethics & Leadership at the Poynter Institute]( Kelly McBride Public Editor Kayla Randall NPR Amaris Castillo Poynter Institute Emily Barske Poynter Institute The Public Editor stands as a source of independent accountability. Created by NPR's board of directors, the Public Editor serves as a bridge between the newsroom and the audience, striving to both listen to the audience's concerns and explain the newsroom's work and ambitions. The office ensures NPR remains steadfast in its mission to present fair, accurate and comprehensive information in service of democracy. [Read more]( from the NPR Public Editor, [contact us]( or follow us on [Twitter](. You received this message because you're subscribed to Public Editor emails. This email was sent by National Public Radio, Inc., 1111 North Capitol Street NE, Washington, DC 20002 [Unsubscribe]( | [Privacy Policy]( [NPR logo]

EDM Keywords (233)

zika years wrote writer work words willpower well weight waded view us understanding types two twitter trying transformation topic today thought think terms terminology team takes take subscribed story stories stick statement starting standards spot spend specifically source someone solely society size share service series sent see sedentary second science sand said risk result response respectful resonated reporting reporters reported relationships reduced received really quotes questions question published presented present precise poynter position poke pieces perspective person perpetuate people part overweight often office obesity obese nurture npr normalized newsroom new need necessary myths much mission messages message medically medical media maybe matter lots lot looking looked look live little listen list linked line likely like life let length learn last journalists journalism jobs job issues issue interviews interview intended insurance insightful individual inclusive inbox important imply impact illnesses hope health head h1n1 grow ground gordon going go giving gap full friendships found focus first find fatness fat failure exploring explore explaining explain expertise exercise example evolving evidence establishing email edited drug done distinction discussion discussed directors diet destigmatize describing describe definitions covering coverage cover couple costs conversation conundrum continue context consider connection condition concerns compelling community colleagues clearer clear clarity choices change challenges center cdc calling bridge board bmi beginning based awareness author audience attempts association asked appreciate appear analyzed ambitions ama always affordability affected advises acknowledges acknowledge achieve accurate ability 2018 2013 19

Marketing emails from npr.org

View More
Sent On

26/06/2023

Sent On

26/06/2023

Sent On

26/06/2023

Sent On

25/06/2023

Sent On

25/06/2023

Sent On

24/06/2023

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2024 SimilarMail.